Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 27, 2024, 11:45 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
Question for our resident creationist(s)

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Question for our resident creationist(s)
Minimalist Offline Donators
Go Blow Jesus Out Your Ass
*****
Religious Views: Fuck It
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation: 259
#11
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 11:44 am
The egg far pre-dates the chicken. We have evidence of dinosaur eggs from 150 million years ago. The chicken dates from some 8,000 years ago and was hybridized from Red and gray junglefowls...which still exist in Southern Asia.

The mystery is over. Evolution has solved it. Unlike religion which never fucking solves anything.
Find
Reply
ronedee Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Catholic
Posts: 1155
Threads: 25
Joined: October 8, 2012
Reputation: 10
#12
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am (This post was last modified: August 13, 2013 at 11:47 am by ronedee.)
(August 13, 2013 at 11:30 am)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: Check out the links I previously provided.

As for what's in my cup: not enough alcohol to make me forget your embarrassing post.

Its all thoery my friend! Just like creationism. I've read enough to know that a "synthsis" or "meiosis" of genetic material doesn't necessarily constitute an egg. But whatever. I failed biology in school.

Anyway... more embarrassing is asking a creationist what came first?
(August 13, 2013 at 11:31 am)The Germans are coming Wrote: You live out of reach.

Lucky you
Quis ut Deus?
Find
Reply
Psykhronic Offline
Freak
***
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 1601
Threads: 2
Joined: January 2, 2013
Reputation: 32
#13
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 11:48 am
(August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am)ronedee Wrote:
(August 13, 2013 at 11:30 am)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: Check out the links I previously provided.

As for what's in my cup: not enough alcohol to make me forget your embarrassing post.

Its all thoery my friend! Just like creationism. I've read enough to know that a "synthsis" or "meiosis" of genetic material doesn't necessarily constitute an egg. But whatever. I failed biology in school.

[Image: +_2acc5a8841f8752904d37f90a8014829.png?1322693145]
Find
Reply
Something completely different Offline
Banned
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 5170
Threads: 364
Joined: September 25, 2012
Reputation: 61
#14
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 11:49 am
(August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am)ronedee Wrote: Lucky you

As expected you refuse the links I posted and take refuge in soley answering the low part of my reply.

Dumbass!
Find
Reply
Faith No More Offline
Better living through chemistry
*****
Religious Views: It's a drug like any other
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation: 92
#15
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 11:54 am
ronedee Wrote:I failed biology in school.

Goddidit is so much easier to understand, isn't it?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Find
Reply
CleanShavenJesus Offline
The Man for His Time and Place
***
Religious Views: Church of the Latter-Day Dude (Dudeism)
Posts: 1424
Threads: 65
Joined: February 11, 2013
Reputation: 26
#16
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 12:01 pm
(August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am)ronedee Wrote:
(August 13, 2013 at 11:30 am)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: Check out the links I previously provided.

As for what's in my cup: not enough alcohol to make me forget your embarrassing post.

Its all thoery my friend! Just like creationism. I've read enough to know that a "synthsis" or "meiosis" of genetic material doesn't necessarily constitute an egg. But whatever. I failed biology in school.

False. Creationism fits the definition of a hypothesis. It doesn't even get "theory" distinction.
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water

[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]



Find
Reply
ronedee Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Catholic
Posts: 1155
Threads: 25
Joined: October 8, 2012
Reputation: 10
#17
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 12:03 pm (This post was last modified: August 13, 2013 at 12:05 pm by ronedee.)
(August 13, 2013 at 11:49 am)The Germans are coming Wrote:
(August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am)ronedee Wrote: Lucky you

As expected you refuse the links I posted and take refuge in soley answering the low part of my reply.

Dumbass!

I don't read [your] links.

Have I called you any names like: dickhead, douchebag, numbskull, idiot....? oh yes I did call you an idiot.... nevermind
(August 13, 2013 at 12:01 pm)CleanShavenJesus Wrote:
(August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am)ronedee Wrote: Its all thoery my friend! Just like creationism. I've read enough to know that a "synthsis" or "meiosis" of genetic material doesn't necessarily constitute an egg. But whatever. I failed biology in school.

False. Creationism fits the definition of a hypothesis. It doesn't even get "theory" distinction.

Thanks for clearing that up for me!

And Egg-volution? Is that fact...professor? I have my pen & paper ready.
Quis ut Deus?
Find
Reply
Nightfoot92 Offline
Newbie
*
Religious Views: Agnostic atheist
Posts: 54
Threads: 9
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation: 0
#18
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 12:06 pm
before constructing an argument against something, you must first know about it. refusal to learn the opposing side and then trying to fight shows extreme arrogance that you are right and absolute foolishness.
Find
Reply
Simon Moon Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 3634
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation: 47
#19
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 12:06 pm (This post was last modified: August 13, 2013 at 12:32 pm by Simon Moon.)
Egg laying organisms evolved millions of years before the chicken, or even birds for that matter.

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Find
Reply
CleanShavenJesus Offline
The Man for His Time and Place
***
Religious Views: Church of the Latter-Day Dude (Dudeism)
Posts: 1424
Threads: 65
Joined: February 11, 2013
Reputation: 26
#20
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 12:15 pm
(August 13, 2013 at 12:03 pm)ronedee Wrote:
(August 13, 2013 at 12:01 pm)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: False. Creationism fits the definition of a hypothesis. It doesn't even get "theory" distinction.

Thanks for clearing that up for me!

And Egg-volution? Is that fact...professor? I have my pen & paper ready.

What you must understand is the amount of evidence in evolution's favor, and amount of evidence against creationism. It's a no-brainer decision which to accept.

You do know that you can believe in God without being so ignorant, right?
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water

[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]



Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
Question for our resident creationist(s)

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Creationist Equivocation Objectivist 28 4037 December 24, 2022 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
Bug The Voyage That Shook The World (2009) - Creationist BS masquerading as science Duty 7 923 September 8, 2020 at 5:32 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The Creationist that Ken Ham calls "stupid" drfuzzy 3 1936 May 7, 2016 at 8:23 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  A Creationist answered 10 questions . . . drfuzzy 26 8659 December 11, 2015 at 10:18 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  search Science Related topics Dinosaur Creationist: The Flintstones was a zebo-the-fat 24 5187 May 28, 2015 at 9:23 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Hope For Our Resident Jesus Freaks? Minimalist 2 1482 September 29, 2014 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Creationist Senators block fossil bill Bittersmart 119 27300 April 5, 2014 at 10:42 pm
Last Post: ThomM
  Pat Robertson implores creationist Ken Ham to shut up Gooders1002 24 5203 February 10, 2014 at 7:53 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  If these resident theists really talk to god.. Brakeman 283 91582 October 1, 2013 at 8:47 pm
Last Post: Drich
  Do creationist know that what they are doing is wrong? Nerd 3 2149 March 24, 2013 at 9:33 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)