Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 10:11 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The most important reason anyone is an atheist
#1
The most important reason anyone is an atheist
Here is the most important reason anyone (well most) is a atheist. Our default stance is to disbelief in something until it meet the burden of proof

Burden of proof Wrote:Holder of the burden

When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed".[1] This burden does not necessarily require a mathematical or strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.
.

Now religion has a heavy burden because of the extraordinary claims made, and the reason we disbelief is because no evidence that is properly verifiable has been offered to to date.
It's not because we are immoral or want to sin or hate god, but many think that so I'd thought I'd clear this up

Now to make one final point, in order to meet the burden of proof (regarding your chosen belief system as a whole) as a theist you must do three things.
1. Proof there is a god.
2. Prove that it is your god and all other gods are fake.
3. Demonstrate that your god is worthy of worship in the prescribed manner.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply
#2
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
But according to Vinny G. and Rational AKD, we either have a burden of proof or it's illogical and fallacious to not believe in God if his existence hasn't been disproven. Now why that doesn't apply to all the other gods they don't believe in, I have no idea...
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#3
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
What? You're not an atheist because you enjoy eating babies?
[Image: 10314461_875206779161622_3907189760171701548_n.jpg]
Reply
#4
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
(October 8, 2013 at 11:08 am)BadWriterSparty Wrote: What? You're not an atheist because you enjoy eating babies?

The barbecue baby brought me here, but the other sinning keeps me here. Big Grin
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
#5
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
The baby was indeed delicious (Christian babies really have a wonderful flavor), but there are no reasons why I am an atheist. My atheism is a lack, not a gain. I just never saw anything interesting, believable, or useful in religion. I never chose this state. It's like asking me the most important reason why my eyes are brown. It's the way they are. I don't have a choice. If you held a gun to my head and tried to make me believe, I would try my best, but I'd fail. And unlike most of you, I don't even know what it feels like to believe.
Reply
#6
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
[Image: oze23_zps8e6c6853.jpg]
Reply
#7
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
(October 8, 2013 at 2:09 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Here is the most important reason anyone (well most) is a atheist. Our default stance is to disbelief in something until it meet the burden of proof

Burden of proof Wrote:Holder of the burden

When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. "If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed".[1] This burden does not necessarily require a mathematical or strictly logical proof, although many strong arguments do rise to this level (such as in logical syllogisms). Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.
.

Now religion has a heavy burden because of the extraordinary claims made, and the reason we disbelief is because no evidence that is properly verifiable has been offered to to date.
It's not because we are immoral or want to sin or hate god, but many think that so I'd thought I'd clear this up

Now to make one final point, in order to meet the burden of proof (regarding your chosen belief system as a whole) as a theist you must do three things.
1. Proof there is a god.
2. Prove that it is your god and all other gods are fake.
3. Demonstrate that your god is worthy of worship in the prescribed manner.

It looks like you got this definition from the Philosophical Burden of Proof from Wikipedia and I do have one concern about it, or perhaps what I desire is a clarification.

You say that religion has the burden of proof due to the nature of its claims, which I 100% agree with, not because of the nature of its claims, but because its the side making any sort of claim at all. What concerns me about the definition of the burden of proof is the phrase I've underlined:

Quote:Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.

By this definition, the (predominately Christian/theist) community could fulfill the burden of proof by determining that it is met by faith alone and, due to the above statement in the definition of the burden of proof, they would then be meeting it, correct? After all, the community would be developing this evidential standard, so if the community concludes that faith alone meets the evidential standard than they've completed their task, no?

I'm not saying that this approach is honest, and it is certainly not evidence of anything, but the wikipedia definition you provided seems to allow for this sneaky kind of loophole.

I'm not very well read with regards to philosophy so I could be completely missing the mark here. Could you expound on how this is not the case?
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.
Reply
#8
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
(October 8, 2013 at 11:58 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote:
Quote:Rather, the evidential standard required for a given claim is determined by convention or community standards, with regard to the context of the claim in question.

By this definition, the (predominately Christian/theist) community could fulfill the burden of proof by determining that it is met by faith alone and, due to the above statement in the definition of the burden of proof, they would then be meeting it, correct? After all, the community would be developing this evidential standard, so if the community concludes that faith alone meets the evidential standard than they've completed their task, no?

They tried this once. It was called the Dark Ages. That's why we don't let churches run science any more.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#9
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
That's perfectly fine but only works when you're assuming materialism to begin with, there isn't a good reason why you have to assume that to begin with though it's just you're own opinion really.
Come all ye faithful joyful and triumphant.
Reply
#10
RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
Do you assume your computer will turn on and work if all the components are cared for and in working order? If so, then you are assuming naturalism, and there's nothing dishonest about that.

I can't say much about materialism though. Care to expound upon the idea that we are making claims to this philosophy somehow?
[Image: 10314461_875206779161622_3907189760171701548_n.jpg]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A question about Dawkins enemies of reason documentary Quill01 3 686 April 17, 2022 at 5:25 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  The reason religion is so powerful Macoleco 344 32651 June 30, 2021 at 11:43 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Reason Jesus must have been a real person mrj 74 12588 March 5, 2021 at 6:44 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  "How God got started", how god belief + basic reason + writing -> modern humans? Whateverist 26 8022 October 15, 2017 at 12:12 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Another Reason Christians are Dangerous Rhondazvous 49 9284 February 5, 2017 at 8:55 am
Last Post: Mr Greene
  Important theological question for creationists Alex K 2 780 November 27, 2016 at 12:51 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Atheists Have the Most Logical Reason for being Moral Rhondazvous 24 8161 January 22, 2016 at 6:49 pm
Last Post: Reforged
  The only important reason I'm more powerful than god. Silver 5 2147 November 13, 2015 at 4:24 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  The reason humans believe drfuzzy 31 6877 October 10, 2015 at 1:18 pm
Last Post: TheRocketSurgeon
  Atheism is the absence of reason.. Vault Boy 49 12456 August 6, 2015 at 12:30 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)