Why is Christianity false and Atheism true?

[Zen Badger]

I think God should always be realistic.

But your god isn't.

[savedwheat]

Hindus believe in reincarnation, but I don't believe humans are going to come back as chickens if they sin too much. And the Hindu god is said to be amoral which is below our own morality so how can God have standards below our own?

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Hindus believe in reincarnation, but I don't believe humans are going to come back as chickens if they sin too much. And the Hindu god is said to be amoral which is below our own morality so how can God have standards below our own?

So you're disregarding Vishnu because you don't believe in it?

You are wrong.

Did you read my post just one post back where I showed how you've moved form saying god is x to you think god is x?

[Esquilax]

I think God should always be realistic.

Oh my god that's going straight in the hall of shame.

It seems to me you can't even fathom what evidence would convince you in God that then if God does not exist and gave you evidence, you wouldn't accept it anyway.

Is that why you came here, Wheaties? To assuage your mind at not being able to present credible evidence for your god? Is that truly the low to which your arguments have sunk, that you need to reinterpret the motivations of every atheist here in order to keep your beliefs safe from interference?

Because what you just said is the catch cry of liars and the deluded everywhere: "I'm right, and if you don't believe me, then there's something wrong with you."

But what's worse is that people have given you examples of what they would accept, and instead of just proceeding on from there- and I think you're afraid of the complete failure of those stated evidences to appear- you try to argue them down from that. Don't haggle, for god's sake! You asked what evidence we'd require, and then when you're given a direct, unambiguous answer, you're the one refusing to accept it!

[savedwheat]

I am disregarding Vishnu because the Creator can't have a morality below our own morality and because sin is not effectively dealt with endless reincarnations as various animals. This life is enough time to receive God's forgiveness.

[là bạn điên]

Hindus believe in reincarnation, but I don't believe humans are going to come back as chickens if they sin too much. And the Hindu god is said to be amoral which is below our own morality so how can God have standards below our own?

Clearly you Christian god has standards way below mine. He is a genocidal manic for starters.

[savedwheat]

Why do you call God a genocidal maniac?

[Esquilax]

Why do you call God a genocidal maniac?

Noah's flood?

Actually, that's more near-omnicide, when I think about it. Much worse than genocide.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

I am disregarding Vishnu because the Creator can't have a morality below our own morality and because sin is not effectively dealt with endless reincarnations as various animals. This life is enough time to receive God's forgiveness.

Why? Because you say so?

I'm not being convinced by your evidence, or your reasoning, thus far.

I don't think you realise that you've gone from saying what you god definitively is to what you think god is.

So I'll just move on from that point you refuse to get and ask why any of us should care one iota about what you think above what we think?

Let's ignore Vishnu then, and talk about Allah instead. Can you provide evidence for Allah instead then please?

[savedwheat]

How can the Creator have a morality below His created beings?