Your Philosophy

[BrokenQuill92]

do only what you like as long as it is of some use to you, leave morals to smaller minds

[EgoRaptor]

Speak for yourself, Kemosabe. That you are ignorant of alternatives doesn't mean they don't exist.

Lol at the Kemosabe bit. I didn't say alternatives don't exist (hence why I said being an atheist NEARLY always results in being an existential nihilist), I just mean that to avoid it one seems to have to take on a position that upon reflection can be seen to be very, ah, malicious.

---

So who else in the world of philosophy do you have rants at?

Eh, I've done Nietzsche before, and William Lane Craig is always so easy a rant-inducing apologist.

Hey, leave Nietzsche alone! I love Nietzsche!

[MindForgedManacle]

Hey, I don't nitpick on him. :p I just sometimes feel he was way too much of a downer. But I won't lie, his shitting past philosophers was ballsy and entertaining.

[Angrboda]

Speak for yourself, Kemosabe. That you are ignorant of alternatives doesn't mean they don't exist.

Lol at the Kemosabe bit. I didn't say alternatives don't exist (hence why I said being an atheist NEARLY always results in being an existential nihilist), I just mean that to avoid it one seems to have to take on a position that upon reflection can be seen to be very, ah, malicious.

Fine, then let me insert the subtext which you ignored.

"That you are ignorant of positive, healthy, non-malicious alternatives doesn't mean they don't exist."

Or are you suggesting that I was proposing bad, malicious alternatives. I think you're still tap-dancing around the limitations of your own perspective in not seeing valid, good alternatives, and then implying that they don't exist. It's a straight argument from ignorance on your part.

[EgoRaptor]

Lol at the Kemosabe bit. I didn't say alternatives don't exist (hence why I said being an atheist NEARLY always results in being an existential nihilist), I just mean that to avoid it one seems to have to take on a position that upon reflection can be seen to be very, ah, malicious.

Fine, then let me insert the subtext which you ignored.

"That you are ignorant of positive, healthy, non-malicious alternatives doesn't mean they don't exist."

Or are you suggesting that I was proposing bad, malicious alternatives. I think you're still tap-dancing around the limitations of your own perspective in not seeing valid, good alternatives, and then implying that they don't exist. It's a straight argument from ignorance on your part.

Are you suggesting exentialism is malicious & unhealthy?

[Angrboda]

Fine, then let me insert the subtext which you ignored.

"That you are ignorant of positive, healthy, non-malicious alternatives doesn't mean they don't exist."

Or are you suggesting that I was proposing bad, malicious alternatives. I think you're still tap-dancing around the limitations of your own perspective in not seeing valid, good alternatives, and then implying that they don't exist. It's a straight argument from ignorance on your part.

Are you suggesting exentialism is malicious & unhealthy?

No, I am not suggesting any such thing.

[houseofcantor]

Craig still used it as justification for the ill treatment of animals. he is a cunt and should be butt raped by Rhinos

Well, when you put it that way...