Posts: 1674
Threads: 81
Joined: March 13, 2014
Reputation:
23
RE: marriage
April 9, 2014 at 3:27 am
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2014 at 3:29 am by Phatt Matt s.)
Aractus is that you in your avatar?
Do you have insomnia Losty?
Posts: 1674
Threads: 81
Joined: March 13, 2014
Reputation:
23
RE: marriage
April 9, 2014 at 3:55 am
Aractus, you are a clever member of this forum. You do realize you got away with posting pornographic content in an area where such explicit content is not allowed?
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: marriage
April 9, 2014 at 4:00 am
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2014 at 4:01 am by Aractus.)
If you're referring to the documentary it's not pornographic. It may have some nudity in it, I can't remember, but the only country on earth that thinks nudity is inappropriate for general audiences is the USA, and the documentary is British. With that said, it probably could give you nightmares it is a disturbing topic!
FYI - Youtube (or rather, Google) actually CENSORS videos it thinks is not for general audiences, and would require you log in if it was inappropriate.
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: marriage
April 9, 2014 at 4:12 am
No, I'm Australian. In Australia, like in Europe, like everywhere full-frontal nudity is not pornography. The USA bans it from TV, I'm aware of that, but no other country (AFAIK) bans it.
Posts: 1674
Threads: 81
Joined: March 13, 2014
Reputation:
23
RE: marriage
April 9, 2014 at 4:13 am
So playboy is not pornography?
Posts: 1674
Threads: 81
Joined: March 13, 2014
Reputation:
23
RE: marriage
April 9, 2014 at 4:36 am
Well that's interesting because typically when I go to confession for pornography it was simply for looking at nude women. So I guess I often times had not been viewing pornography when I thought I had. Interesting?