marriage

[Losty]

Losty did you watch that film about bestiality star bodil?

That was one of the saddest lives I've ever heard of. Poor thing I hope she's in Heaven.

Also, to set the record straight, I love animals but will never act out sexually with them and have never done so.

I watched a bit of the first jerry springer clip. It kind of ruined my night. :/

[Phatt Matt s]

Aractus is that you in your avatar?

---

Do you have insomnia Losty?

[Aractus]

I watched a bit of the first jerry springer clip. It kind of ruined my night. :/

That's a standard Springer for ya.

Aractus is that you in your avatar?

I should think not, it is Bill Hartnell:

[Phatt Matt s]

Aractus, you are a clever member of this forum. You do realize you got away with posting pornographic content in an area where such explicit content is not allowed?

[Aractus]

If you're referring to the documentary it's not pornographic. It may have some nudity in it, I can't remember, but the only country on earth that thinks nudity is inappropriate for general audiences is the USA, and the documentary is British. With that said, it probably could give you nightmares it is a disturbing topic!

FYI - Youtube (or rather, Google) actually CENSORS videos it thinks is not for general audiences, and would require you log in if it was inappropriate.

[Phatt Matt s]

Are you from the US? I watched all 50 minutes of it. It was a very interesting and sad documentary. So there wasn't any pornography? It showed lots of boobs and a few vaginas.

---

I'll never ever forget that. It gives more insight and compassion into those whose lives are bankrupt

[Aractus]

No, I'm Australian. In Australia, like in Europe, like everywhere full-frontal nudity is not pornography. The USA bans it from TV, I'm aware of that, but no other country (AFAIK) bans it.

[Phatt Matt s]

So playboy is not pornography?

[Aractus]

The magazine is age-restricted, yes. But that's different as it is intentionally sexualized content, although no it's not pornography, pornography is depiction of actual intercourse (and by that definition soft-core and masturbation videos don't qualify). In Australia, the X-rating would apply to porn, and there's a list of stuff that porn isn't allowed to include, like violence including simulated rape. The USA does not have any of those prohibitions to porn, just about the only restriction the US has is the age restriction. What is legal in the USA is comparable to what was legal in Denmark in the 70's, just as Denmark gave the world 10-years worth of legally produced bestiality and child pornography, the USA has delivered legally produced "simulated" rape and torture, and that's no better then Denmark.

Traditionally, almost all X-rated content is also available in censored R-rated content, since X-rated stuff can only legally be sold in registered sex shops, and legally not anywhere except here in the ACT and in the NT (although in practice it's sold everywhere), whereas anything that's been converted to soft-core can be sold in regular shops. Nude magazines like Zoo Weekly, are under a different law, but yes they're age restricted but available from general stores like newsagencies and servos (petrol stations), and I believe the sexually explicit ones (Hustler, etc) are as well, I could be mistaken on that it may only be nudity.

[Phatt Matt s]

Well that's interesting because typically when I go to confession for pornography it was simply for looking at nude women. So I guess I often times had not been viewing pornography when I thought I had. Interesting?