Christians, what is your VERY BEST arguments for the existence of God?

[Darwinian]

Then you must have lead an incredibly sheltered and quiet life to date if that sounds ridiculous to you.

You think there can be evidence for God?! Which tree did you just fall out of?

Doesn't make any sense :S

[fr0d0]

@ Dar

God cannot be demonstrated in a lab. That's very basic theology.

[Darwinian]

I didn't say he could :S I think you must be having a senior moment

[fr0d0]

Demonstrate God for me in a lab.

HA HA! Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

Then you must have lead an incredibly sheltered and quiet life to date if that sounds ridiculous to you. :S

Looks like you did to me!

[theVOID]

I'd love to see this logical argument you speak of.

Use your brain and think about it then. You insist on verifiable evidence for your so called reasoning. So when you're sure, THEN you decide it's true. You cannot reason without someone else having done the work for you.

A total cop-out as usual.

1) It is specifically because i can think of no valid logical argument for the existence of god myself that i examine the logical arguments made by others and request them when their existence is asserted. You have numerous times asserted the existence of such an argument but you have never presented it.

2) I am not in any way asking you to do the work for me, i will assess all arguments myself. What i am doing is requesting you actually present this argument that you claim to have.

Either you know of a valid logical argument for the existence of god or you do not, which is it?

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

Either you know of a valid logical argument for the existence of god or you do not, which is it?

Don't know about you mate, but I'm ready to give odds of 100/1 (against) on the negative..

[Darwinian]

Demonstrate God for me in a lab.

HA HA! Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

Then you must have lead an incredibly sheltered and quiet life to date if that sounds ridiculous to you. :S

Looks like you did to me!

No, no you silly boy. I was referring to the other statement..

Thing is, evolution can be demonstrated in a laboratory (See Lenski experiment)

HA HA! Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

[theVOID]

Either you know of a valid logical argument for the existence of god or you do not, which is it?

Don't know about you mate, but I'm ready to give odds of 100/1 (against) on the negative..

That's fairly generous odds against Fr0d0 actually presenting this argument, i would say it's more like 10,000/1 against

[fr0d0]

Demonstrate God for me in a lab.

HA HA! Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

Then you must have lead an incredibly sheltered and quiet life to date if that sounds ridiculous to you. :S

Looks like you did to me!

No, no you silly boy. I was referring to the other statement..

Thing is, evolution can be demonstrated in a laboratory (See Lenski experiment)

HA HA! Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

Which was obviously not what Watson meant - notice the bolding. Time to get some new specs grandad

---

I'd love to see this logical argument you speak of.

Use your brain and think about it then. You insist on verifiable evidence for your so called reasoning. So when you're sure, THEN you decide it's true. You cannot reason without someone else having done the work for you.

A total cop-out as usual.

1) It is specifically because i can think of no valid logical argument for the existence of god myself that i examine the logical arguments made by others and request them when their existence is asserted. You have numerous times asserted the existence of such an argument but you have never presented it.

2) I am not in any way asking you to do the work for me, i will assess all arguments myself. What i am doing is requesting you actually present this argument that you claim to have.

Either you know of a valid logical argument for the existence of god or you do not, which is it?

No you dipshit. You won't consider the POV and laughingly then claim there is no argument. You are beyond pity.

[Watson]

The problem is, Darwinian, is what you said was requesting a logical explanation for something which cannot be explained logically. You can explain why you believe in it in a logical manner, but cannot present any 'logical' evidence for it's existance because it is not something to be pressed into the box of logic.