Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2026, 12:43 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Abortion is morally wrong
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
(July 1, 2014 at 12:47 pm)Bibliofagus Wrote: And they influence views on the grey areas as well. What about a 14 year old girl getting pregnant? Or better put: what pressure would 'pro life' parents put on their pregnant 14 year old daughter?
I believe they would force her to marry.

Quote:In Holland we have State funded anonymous abortions. Best thing to ever happen to girls unlucky enough to have fundamentalist parents. They get pregnant more often because abstination is taught.
abstinence.
Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
@blackout:
I tried quoting the pile above but I couldn't figure out how to correctly do it. First of all: thank you for your answer. I think I see were you are coming from. I have a problem however.

You've posted that only 50% or something of your people bothered to even turn up the day they could have made abortion illegal. Then you said that funding for contraception would be too expensive for your people ever to want to fund. I'm guessing that means you think they would turn up in bigger numbers and vote it away as well.

But abortions are not only more expensive, but also a - lot - more controversial than contraception. Yet you appear to believe that state funded contraception is unattainable in Portugal while state funded abortion was democratically voted into law.

How come?
Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
(July 1, 2014 at 2:47 pm)blackout94 Wrote: I didn't say abortion was skyrocketing in portugal, I just said some women are using it wrongly, abortion should be a last resort, not a contraceptive measure, at least they should pay out of their pockets to incentive them to not use abortion like this. I never compared portugal with the UK or any other country, but recent statistics showed one or two years after legalization abortions per women increased, considering we are in a crisis and few people have means to provide for a full family this is justified.

(bold mine)

Who are you to decide how women should use abortion? It's none of your business. Even if it's a tax thing, people bring lung cancer on themselves. Should they pay out-of-pocket for their treatments? How about diabetics? People who broke a leg in a motorcycle accident?

Also, you're going to have to cite your sources if you want us to believe abortions increased. I simply don't believe you. I had to have an abortion once (I had a dead fetus that didn't want to leave naturally), and it was probably the most physically painful thing I've ever experienced. Do you really think women WANT to have abortions?

Your lines of reasoning have been debunked several times in this thread, among countless other abortion threads on this forum. I understand you're (sort of) pro choice, but you sound a lot like someone who isn't.
Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
(July 1, 2014 at 3:48 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:
(July 1, 2014 at 2:47 pm)blackout94 Wrote: I didn't say abortion was skyrocketing in portugal, I just said some women are using it wrongly, abortion should be a last resort, not a contraceptive measure, at least they should pay out of their pockets to incentive them to not use abortion like this. I never compared portugal with the UK or any other country, but recent statistics showed one or two years after legalization abortions per women increased, considering we are in a crisis and few people have means to provide for a full family this is justified.

(bold mine)

Who are you to decide how women should use abortion? It's none of your business. Even if it's a tax thing, people bring lung cancer on themselves. Should they pay out-of-pocket for their treatments? How about diabetics? People who broke a leg in a motorcycle accident?

Also, you're going to have to cite your sources if you want us to believe abortions increased. I simply don't believe you. I had to have an abortion once (I had a dead fetus that didn't want to leave naturally), and it was probably the most physically painful thing I've ever experienced. Do you really think women WANT to have abortions?

Your lines of reasoning have been debunked several times in this thread, among countless other abortion threads on this forum. I understand you're (sort of) pro choice, but you sound a lot like someone who isn't.

Firstly I'm no one to decide on how women should use abortions neither did I intend to control such choice, I'm sorry if I didn't express myself correctly. However, I'm not sure whether abortion is cheaper or contraceptives. If contraceptives are cheaper then I have the right to demand my state funds education and contraceptives to prevent increase in abortion rate.

If you can read in portuguese, I can quote you several studies and statistics that show evidence, the main factor for abortion increasing being the financial/economical crisis, I have no need to check studies in english since in my country we use our language and our institute of statistics is a lot closer to our social reality compared to a foreign institute.

I believe you when you say aborting was the most painful thing you ever done and I don't think women enjoy doing abortions as an hobby.

To finish, I never really argued as either pro choice or pro life completely, I simply stated abortion is still ethically an inner debate and I have not yet decided myself on it, I have this right and if I were asked to vote for complete legalization I would probably abstain.

(July 1, 2014 at 3:26 pm)Bibliofagus Wrote: @blackout:
I tried quoting the pile above but I couldn't figure out how to correctly do it. First of all: thank you for your answer. I think I see were you are coming from. I have a problem however.

You've posted that only 50% or something of your people bothered to even turn up the day they could have made abortion illegal. Then you said that funding for contraception would be too expensive for your people ever to want to fund. I'm guessing that means you think they would turn up in bigger numbers and vote it away as well.

But abortions are not only more expensive, but also a - lot - more controversial than contraception. Yet you appear to believe that state funded contraception is unattainable in Portugal while state funded abortion was democratically voted into law.

How come?

It was democratically voted because only pro choice people who want the right to abort bothered to show up, pro lifers, the majority of the population just thought 'YES will never win this referendum so I'm not going to show up'. And we voted to legalize abortion, not to make it illegal, it was illegal, but to make it legal according to the mother's will. (I didn't vote because I was a minor)

Contraceptives are not subjected to referendum therefore people had no saying in it, and most are too stupid to even realize contraceptives are cheaper than contraception, most people would vote yes if asked 'Should the government raise expenses on public hospitals?' and no when asked 'Should the state raise taxes?' (In this last case, it would be necessary to invest more in public hospitals) - See the stupidity?
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
Blackout, can I ask how you would vote if voting was compulsory like it is in some other countries?

Quote:I simply stated abortion is still ethically an inner debate

Right... for pregnant women.
Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
(July 1, 2014 at 4:06 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Blackout, can I ask how you would vote if voting was compulsory like it is in some other countries?


Quote:I simply stated abortion is still ethically an inner debate

Right... for pregnant women.
What do you mean by this last expression?

I would vote yes, other people do not have to think like me, with legalization people who are against still don't need to abort.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
Quote:Representative Trent Franks (AZ) wants to ban all abortions because “The incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low.” he's a fucking asshole.

Fixed that.

My congressman.... one of the shittiest ever.
Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
Blackout my point in response to you saying that abortion is ethically an inner debate was that the only people worrying about that "ethical inner debate" should be pregnant women. It's not anyone else's business.
Reply
RE: Abortion is morally wrong
(July 1, 2014 at 4:16 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Blackout my point in response to you saying that abortion is ethically an inner debate was that the only people worrying about that "ethical inner debate" should be pregnant women. It's not anyone else's business.

This is the kind of argument I despise. Why should only pregnant women be able to argue about abortion? Because they are pregnant? This makes no sense. I can decide whether I consider abortion ethically correct or not according to my personal principles without depending on other people's consent. By this logic, all categories of people would decide their rights, this is of course unbearable.

So by this logic non pregnant women cannot worry about the ethics of abortion? Makes perfect sense

So I cannot support the ethics of gay marriage because I'm straight? I cannot support the ethics of black people's rights because I'm white? People who vote laws are mostly white men and they gave women the right to have an abortion, so don't complain about it. Just because you can't experience something it doesn't mean you can't judge it, there are dozens of conducts I can judge without experiencing physically/first hand.

So I guess my previous answer on Yes makes me pro choice right? I'm sorry if I offended you in anyway.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why is murder wrong if Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is true? FlatAssembler 52 14630 August 7, 2022 at 8:51 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  J.J. Thompson's Violinist Thought Experiment Concerning Abortion vulcanlogician 29 7045 January 3, 2022 at 10:27 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  After birth abortion? Mystical 109 28198 August 19, 2018 at 11:47 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  What is wrong with FW? Little Rik 126 42329 August 17, 2018 at 4:10 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  God does not determine right and wrong Alexmahone 134 42016 February 12, 2018 at 7:14 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Is it possible for a person to be morally neutral? Der/die AtheistIn 10 4308 October 15, 2017 at 7:14 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Abortion -cpr on the fetus? answer-is-42 153 42645 July 5, 2015 at 12:50 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  What is wrong with this premise? Heywood 112 42243 February 21, 2015 at 3:34 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  The foundations of William L. Craigs "science" proven wrong? Arthur Dent 5 2349 July 25, 2014 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  "God has morally sufficient reasons for permitting evil" Freedom of thought 58 30871 December 27, 2013 at 12:58 am
Last Post: Freedom of thought



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)