Damned Christians

[Mashmont]

Ah I see the problem. You classify as teachings you don’t like pertaining to women as abuse. Like marriage. Like childbirth. Like male priests

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Ah I see the problem. You classify as teachings  you don’t like pertaining to women as abuse. Like marriage. Like childbirth.  Like male priests

No, I classify abuse as abuse. The notion that it's impossible for a husband to rape his wife is an abusive one.

Boru

[Ahriman]

Ah I see the problem. You classify as teachings  you don’t like pertaining to women as abuse. Like marriage. Like childbirth.  Like male priests

No, I classify abuse as abuse. The notion that it's impossible for a husband to rape his wife is an abusive one.

Boru

Well yeah, but that's not a Christian problem, so much as a human problem. Don't pretend like Christians are the only people who do that shit.

[Mashmont]

Ah I see the problem. You classify as teachings  you don’t like pertaining to women as abuse. Like marriage. Like childbirth.  Like male priests

No, I classify abuse as abuse. The notion that it's impossible for a husband to rape his wife is an abusive one.

Boru

You’re doing it again. Married mutual sex isn’t rape. Just because you may wish two particular people hadn’t married doesn’t make sex ‘assault’

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

No, I classify abuse as abuse. The notion that it's impossible for a husband to rape his wife is an abusive one.

Boru

Well yeah, but that's not a Christian problem, so much as a human problem. Don't pretend like Christians are the only people who do that shit.

I'm not pretending anything of the sort. I'm objecting to the silly-arsed notion that Christians don't believe a woman is property and is worth less than a man.

Boru

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

No, I classify abuse as abuse. The notion that it's impossible for a husband to rape his wife is an abusive one.

Boru

You’re doing it again. Married mutual sex isn’t rape. Just because you may wish two particular people hadn’t married doesn’t make sex ‘assault’

I never said 'mutual married sex' was rape. But under some Christian denominations, a man can force himself on his wife and it can't be considered rape.

See, this is why - in enlightened societies - secular laws supersede religious ones.

Boru

[Ahriman]

You’re doing it again. Married mutual sex isn’t rape. Just because you may wish two particular people hadn’t married doesn’t make sex ‘assault’

I never said 'mutual married sex' was rape. But under some Christian denominations, a man can force himself on his wife and it can't be considered rape.

See, this is why - in enlightened societies - secular laws supersede religious ones.

Boru

In a truly enlightened society, religious law would be a way of life.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I never said 'mutual married sex' was rape. But under some Christian denominations, a man can force himself on his wife and it can't be considered rape.

See, this is why - in enlightened societies - secular laws supersede religious ones.

Boru

In a truly enlightened society, religious law would be a way of life.

The last time that happened in the West, it was called ‘The Dark Ages’. You know, slaughtering heathens, killing witches, denying education to the masses, poverty, starvation. Good times, amirite?

Boru

[Ahriman]

In a truly enlightened society, religious law would be a way of life.

The last time that happened in the West, it was called ‘The Dark Ages’.

Boru

The Dark Age was the real Enlightenment.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

The last time that happened in the West, it was called ‘The Dark Ages’.

Boru

The Dark Age was the real Enlightenment.

So, you believe that sinners should be killed with rocks, a man should be allowed to own slaves, a husband should be allowed to rape his wife, and non-believers should be burnt at the stake?

Boru