Damned Christians

[Mister Agenda]

Not surprised they don't want to give up the reward money. It's their God after all, it's printed right on it.

[Ranjr]

Josh Duggar Trial: Defense questions Homeland Security agent on Day Three

The agent claimed Duggar used a Linux partition on one of the computers at the car lot to get around software that alerted his wife if he viewed pornography. 

After analyzing the seized materials, the agent says his team found several files depicting child porn on a computer that Duggar had accessed. He then stated that some of the types of images located on Duggar's computer ranked among the worst he has seen in his career investigating child pornography.

[LadyForCamus]

Gross.

[Ranjr]

We got an ad in the mail from Jim Bob Duggar the other day.  Josh's dad is running for state representative again.  Jim Bob proudly boasts he is "Your Pro-life candidate."  But, by his actions, once a kid is born, they're on their own.

[T.J.]

This reminds me of a Christian Science Practitioner who told the police one day, "Check my phone you won't find anything on my phone."

They checked it and found child porn. He is now in prison.

[Neo-Scholastic]

We got an ad in the mail from Jim Bob Duggar the other day.  Josh's dad is running for state representative again.  Jim Bob proudly boasts he is "Your Pro-life candidate."  But, by his actions, once a kid is born, they're on their own.

Yeah, it is better to kill them before they become a problem. <sarcasm>

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

We got an ad in the mail from Jim Bob Duggar the other day.  Josh's dad is running for state representative again.  Jim Bob proudly boasts he is "Your Pro-life candidate."  But, by his actions, once a kid is born, they're on their own.

Yeah, it is better to kill them before they become a problem. <sarcasm>

Your implicit claim that a foetus is a human being is just that; a claim. It is based on religious belief and maudlin sentiment, not science.

 Here a foetus is not  considered a human being until it is viable ex utero. That is usually seen as at the end 24 weeks, and that is a maybe.

[Belacqua]

...It is based on religious belief and maudlin sentiment...

This is not true. 

It is based on ancient arguments concerning what it means for one thing to change into another thing, vs. what it is for a single thing to change from one state to another. 

If object A begins with the potentiality to grow and change into state X, state Y, and then state Z, it changes its state but continues to be the same object. That is, it changes from fetus to child to adult, but remains a human being.

If object B does not contain the potentiality to grow and change into state X, but then combines with another thing, and the new combination gains a new potentiality, then object B has changed from one thing to another. The egg alone does not contain the potentiality to change into an adult. Therefore it is not a human by itself. When fertilized, it gains that potentiality. Therefore the ontological change occurs at fertilization, not before and not after.

Not religious belief, not maudlin sentiment.

Here a foetus is not  considered a human being until it is viable ex utero. That is usually seen as at the end 24 weeks, and that is a maybe.

What is the logical argument which demonstrates that the thing becomes a human being when it becomes viable? Is there such an argument, or is it more a matter of practical convenience?

[Ranjr]

Yeah, it is better to kill them before they become a problem. <sarcasm>

It's better to protect women and children from oppressive ideologies.  But by all means, keep defending the Duggars.

[Fake Messiah]

Congressman, Madison Cawthorn, in a bid to overturn Roe V Wade and deny American women reproductive rights, publicly referred to women as “Earthen vessels, sanctified by Almighty God.”

Video




Direct link https://www.facebook.com/186842420994378...9454525242