Christianity and its effect on self-worth

[TubbyTubby]

So what evidence brought you to the 'about 50,000 years old' conclusion?

From nuclear engineer, professors and nuclear physicist.
None of which are aliened with Answers in Genesis.

GC

Are we privy to the names of these eminent people and their work?

Presumably that's a typo and they're not actually aliens or have been aliened.

[Natachan]

So the grounds given for dismissing atomic theory, geology, and evolutionary theory, is the opinion of three supposed PhDs that he knows, but can't point to any peer reviewed papers or research, or even give where these people are employed, or their names.

Meanwhile I got a pile of books, lab manuals, experimental notes, and papers of my own to say otherwise. Not to mention the mentioned the masses of peer reviewed literature on the subject. The 50,000 year claim is demonstrably false.

[Alex K]

So the grounds given for dismissing atomic theory, geology, and evolutionary theory, is the opinion of three supposed PhDs that he knows, but can't point to any peer reviewed papers or research, or even give where these people are employed, or their names.

Meanwhile I got a pile of books, lab manuals, experimental notes, and papers of my own to say otherwise. Not to mention the mentioned the masses of peer reviewed literature on the subject. The 50,000 year claim is demonstrably false.

I don't know what it is with these Creationists parading around PhDs like they are some kind of special sauce. I mean, I have one, and look at me, I don't even know how to tie my shoes properly.

[Godscreated]

How did you show an upper limit? Can we see links to anything demonstrating where 50,000 came from?

I said, if you would read so I do not have to waste my time repeating things, that no dating system is reliable after 50,000 years. carbon dating was once thought of as the ultimate in dating, we now know that it falls apart in less than 3,000 years.

GC

[Fidel_Castronaut]

How did you show an upper limit? Can we see links to anything demonstrating where 50,000 came from?

I said, if you would read so I do not have to waste my time repeating things, that no dating system is reliable after 50,000 years.

Wrong.

carbon dating was once thought of as the ultimate in dating, we now know that it falls apart in less than 3,00 years.

GC

[Godscreated]

From nuclear engineer, professors and nuclear physicist.
None of which are aliened with Answers in Genesis.

GC

Are we privy to the names of these eminent people and their work?

Presumably that's a typo and they're not actually aliens or have been aliened.

You enjoy showing you arrogance or stupidity take your choice. I will not give names I will not have people here calling these brilliant thinkers, whatever comes out of their perverted minds. They are my friends and I respect their privacy. Believe me about them or not I really couldn't care less.

Let me say this though, the moon is moving away from the earth and at the rate it's moving away, the moon would have been so close to the earth 20,000 to 30,000 years ago gravity would have pulled it into the earth.

GC

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Are we privy to the names of these eminent people and their work?

Presumably that's a typo and they're not actually aliens or have been aliened.

You enjoy showing you arrogance or stupidity take your choice. I will not give names I will not have people here calling these brilliant thinkers, whatever comes out of their perverted minds. They are my friends and I respect their privacy. Believe me about them or not I really couldn't care less.

GC

So you're a liar then.

Because if someone's published something they've forfeited their right to privacy. Indeed, they've published something for the sole purpose of letting others read their findings.

So...bullshit walks and talks in your world then GC?

Typical. You make a pathetic, absurd claim (lie), then as soon as someone makes the very reasonable request for you to supply something that would allow us to evaluate your and indeed our stance (read: evidence), you wet your pants and throw a tantrum claiming that we're the unreasonable ones and that we're the ones who are doing something wrong. And you wonder why we get annoyed when you decide to take a dump on these threads with utter nonsense that even a child could see through.

You're pathetic you know that? Absolutely pathetic.

[dyresand]

You enjoy showing you arrogance or stupidity take your choice. I will not give names I will not have people here calling these brilliant thinkers, whatever comes out of their perverted minds. They are my friends and I respect their privacy. Believe me about them or not I really couldn't care less.

GC

So you're a liar then.

Because if someone's published something they've forfeited their right to privacy. Indeed, they've published something for the sole purpose of letting others read their findings.

So...bullshit walks and talks in your world then GC?

Typical. You make a pathetic, absurd claim (lie), then as soon as someone makes the very reasonable request for you to supply something that would allow us to evaluate your and indeed our stance (read: evidence), you wet your pants and throw a tantrum claiming that we're the unreasonable ones and that we're the ones who are doing something wrong. And you wonder why we get annoyed when you decide to take a dump on these threads with utter nonsense that even a child could see through.

You're pathetic you know that? Absolutely pathetic.

Remember a Theist is more likely to lie, while a atheist is more likely to tell the truth.

[Godscreated]

So you're a liar then.

Because if someone's published something they've forfeited their right to privacy. Indeed, they've published something for the sole purpose of letting others read their findings.

So...bullshit walks and talks in your world then GC?

Typical. You make a pathetic, absurd claim (lie), then as soon as someone makes the very reasonable request for you to supply something that would allow us to evaluate your and indeed our stance (read: evidence), you wet your pants and throw a tantrum claiming that we're the unreasonable ones and that we're the ones who are doing something wrong. And you wonder why we get annoyed when you decide to take a dump on these threads with utter nonsense that even a child could see through.

You're pathetic you know that? Absolutely pathetic.

Remember a Theist is more likely to lie, while a atheist is more likely to tell the truth.

Not according to your actions.

[dyresand]

Remember a Theist is more likely to lie, while a atheist is more likely to tell the truth.

Not according to your actions.

please i inquire more evidence contrary to the fact. It's not like you ever told the truth spreading the word of god or Jesus when he had evidence to prove that Jesus never existed. Then you went around to attack science saying how carbon dating couldn't go back further thank 5 thousand years. So how should we even believe you to ever tell the truth when you lie and cower behind the bible. I wouldn't put it past you if we were back in the slavery days you would probably whip slaves needlessly and say god wanted me to do it. tell me again how are you even being truthful to anyone of us.