Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 1, 2024, 9:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1
#21
RE: The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1
(May 3, 2015 at 11:07 pm)Theoretical Skeptic Wrote:
(May 3, 2015 at 10:38 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Oh!  I get it!  It's because you say so!

OP, you do realize there are 39,000 sects of Christianity?  At least 20 different followings of Judaism?  More than 20 in Islam?  All Abrahamic religions... but what about those who are non-denominational?  Those who say they have the "correct" interpretation of the Bible or other holy book number pretty much all of those people involved in all of those different sects?

In other words: why are you right, and they're all wrong?  Why are you the special snowflake?

[turns head from side to side as if checking for anyone paying attention] Pssst! [whispers] I'm Daystar / Raymond. I'm a sock puppet you idiots. Tell Darwinian he's a wimpy putz.  

Darwinian hurt you deeply I can tell.

Unrequited love is a terrible thing. 



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








#22
RE: The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1
Oooh, he's gonna burn in Hell for that one!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

#23
RE: The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1
(May 3, 2015 at 10:00 pm)Theoretical Skeptic Wrote: The Hebrew verb consists of two different states. The perfect state indicates an action which is complete, whereas the imperfect state indicates a continuous or incomplete action.
Anytime someone uses the difference in language to explain a particular interpretation of a Bible passage, I am reminded that according to that same Bible, it was god who confused man's languages and is therefore directly responsible for the diversity of language in the world.  That means that any confusion over the wording of any passage or text is god's fault; he could've made it so that languages were perfectly consistent with one another to avoid any such misunderstanding or misinterpretation.  But he didn't.  He also could've "inspired" the writers to write more clearly and with more detail, but he didn't.  It's almost as if he wanted the Bible to be an indecipherable mess so that he could watch humanity stumble over itself trying to make sense of it.  Or if, you know... he didn't exist and it was just a bunch of stories written by ordinary people inspired by nothing more than their imaginations.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
#24
RE: The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1
He could have inspired a new language that everyone immediately always understood, and which couldn't be altered once written.

If he's omnipotent of course. Sock boy here was playing the nomni angle, which is more defensible, I'll give him that.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
#25
RE: The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1
(May 3, 2015 at 10:15 pm)Theoretical Skeptic Wrote: ... The Bible doesn't present God as omniscient...


Job 36:

3 I will fetch my knowledge from afar, and will ascribe righteousness to my Maker.

4 For truly my words shall not be false: he that is perfect in knowledge is with thee.


Psalm 147:

5 Great is our Lord, and of great power: his understanding is infinite.


1 John 3:

19 And hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before him.

20 For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things.



Of course, given the batshit crazy interpretations of the opening post, we can expect you to believe that these mean something other than what they state.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
#26
RE: The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1
(May 3, 2015 at 10:00 pm)Theoretical Skeptic Wrote: The Hebrew verb consists of two different states.

I rather thought Hebrew verbs did that "seven binyanim" thing. The principles of consonantal roots and gemination applied in common with Egyptian. The verbal system had a causative and a stative, also found in Egyptian but not in Indo-European languages, where for instance in English the past participle and passive are the closest equivalents: We say "the table is set," a state of affairs resulting from a previous action.

Yet as hard as Egyptian be with 19+ grammatical forms for its verb, Hebrew is even worse. I don't know any Hebrew, only that Egyptian borrowed a few words and constructions from it, hence referral to the primers below. The difficulty of Hebrew has made a mess of rendering the Old Testament in English. A fair amount of what we think the bible says based on reading English versions is either misleading or plain wrong, and we have no idea what many of its passages really meant.

The creation models are similar in Egypt and Canaan: Begin with a universe filled with water (instead of empty space). Blow a big air bubble in this infinite flood. That creates a dome, with "waters above the firmament divided from the waters below" and conveniently explains why the sky is blue: It's a water surface (upside down) on which Ra, the sun god, sails in his day boat. (Demote the celestial bodies if you're following the Elohim or Yahweh.) Finally, land emerges from the "waters below" and becomes clothed with vegetation for cattle and people to enjoy. Khnum Yahwheh shapes the first men and women first man from wet clay on a potter's wheel dust into which he breathes life. Voila!

Washington.edu http://depts.washington.edu/bibheb/files/VerbStems.pdf
Tzion.org http://tzion.org/devarim/The%20Seven%20Binyanim.pdf

I think it was the Norse who had that noun "banhammer."  Tongue



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 9491 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  There are no answers in Genesis LinuxGal 248 20807 March 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 44154 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis GrandizerII 614 68483 March 9, 2019 at 8:38 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Genesis interpretations - how many are there? Fake Messiah 129 17289 January 22, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: donlor
  Free interpretation of the Genesis 3:5 KJV theBorg 19 3731 November 13, 2016 at 2:03 am
Last Post: RiddledWithFear
  Genesis - The Prequel! Time Traveler 12 3262 May 17, 2016 at 1:16 am
Last Post: Love333
  Rewriting the bible part 1 - Genesis dyresand 4 1964 March 12, 2016 at 3:14 am
Last Post: robvalue
  god is a moron - genesis dyresand 70 18853 August 7, 2015 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Footnote to Genesis 3:7 daver49 35 6942 March 24, 2015 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Huggy Bear



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)