Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 4:27 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Alternate History
#21
RE: Alternate History
Revolution. The Queen has the power to abdicate and disband the monarchy. All you'd need to do is threaten her with a civil war, or have a large amount of the citizenship on your side. Hence why the more people we convert to anti-monarchism, the easier it'll be. Tongue
Reply
#22
RE: Alternate History
(April 10, 2010 at 2:34 pm)Tiberius Wrote: We don't need to take off anyone's heads, we just need to convert the deluded masses into the correct way of thinking, which is that the monarchy is outdated and ineffective. We need more vocal people in the anti-monarchy movement.



But it is quite a tourist attraction.
Reply
#23
RE: Alternate History
(April 10, 2010 at 2:53 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Revolution. The Queen has the power to abdicate and disband the monarchy. All you'd need to do is threaten her with a civil war, or have a large amount of the citizenship on your side. Hence why the more people we convert to anti-monarchism, the easier it'll be. Tongue

Sounds like the mid 16 hundreds English rebellion against the monarchy. Only this time, no violence.
That is one way yes. However, you will need many many supporters. Very vocal supporters. Still a huge hill to climb.

One thing I didn't like reading in that link you put in your earlier post was this -
Quote:the people of Britain are not citizens, but subjects of the monarch. Most public servants must swear an oath of loyalty, or make an affirmation of their loyalty, to the crown.
Didn't like that part. I'm no "subject"! Don't like the "servants" and "swear oath of loyalty" either.
I really am with you on the anti-monarchy.

How does the UR (United Republic) Sound to you? United Republic of Britain. Might take a while getting used to. So used to calling it the UK (United Kingdom).
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
#24
RE: Alternate History
(April 6, 2010 at 9:19 pm)padraic Wrote: I enjoy the entirely pointless speculation of alternative history.

One of my favourites is: What if England had won the US war of Independence? They actually came close. What if they had arrested the major signaturies to the Declaration of Independence?

A few issues spring to mind: American expansionism;The Spanish American War,Texas, California, the Louisiana purchase, Alaska, Hawaii.

As part of The British Commonwealth, the US would have entered WW1 in 1914 and WW2 in 1939.

My perception is the loss America as an unmitigated disaster for Britain at the very least.

I'm somewhat interested in alternate 'history, but I admit that the American Revolution is not one I'd been thinking about. Mostly, what I've been thinking about is what would have happened if the Kyujo incident was successful and what the consequences of Operation Downfall would have been. I mean, sure, America would have beaten Japan, but what would running around in a nuked-out wasteland have done to American troops, or their descendants, for that matter?
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#25
RE: Alternate History
(April 10, 2010 at 2:59 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
(April 10, 2010 at 2:34 pm)Tiberius Wrote: We don't need to take off anyone's heads, we just need to convert the deluded masses into the correct way of thinking, which is that the monarchy is outdated and ineffective. We need more vocal people in the anti-monarchy movement.
But it is quite a tourist attraction.
The palaces and castles are the tourist attractions. No tourist gets to see the Queen. I'm all for keeping our historical sites as part of British tradition, but there isn't any need for a Queen to inhabit them to make them tourist attractions.
Reply
#26
RE: Alternate History
If you don't have a queen you don't need a palace guard and thus you don't need to change the guard.

Besides, the horses are beautiful.
Reply
#27
RE: Alternate History
The national trust (a private charity) would probably be put in charge of all that. They already own a lot of tourist attractions in the UK, preserving them. Your argument is true in a respect, but then there isn't any reason to re-enact battles from history yet those are very popular. If the tourists want to see the changing of the guard, there isn't any reason why the national trust wouldn't provide it. They make a lot of money from tourist attractions.
Reply
#28
RE: Alternate History
Call me a traditionalist but "The National Trust Life Guards" does not have the same catchy ring as "The Queen's Life Guards."
Reply
#29
RE: Alternate History
Then call them the Queen's Life Guards. The National Trust doesn't go about renaming things, it goes about preserving them.
Reply
#30
RE: Alternate History
We have the changing of the guards here! And our Parliament looks exactly like some building in Westminster. The Queen is a ranking member of our Government. Sweet.

It is fascism, i think the CCTV cameras are the worst part, but I could be wrong. You live there. Let me say that America is no walk in the park these days either. It is good to be American, ideologically...
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Voting History Silver 8 286 October 31, 2024 at 6:52 am
Last Post: brewer
  Is there a continent in history where Britain never went too? Sweden83 21 1859 December 5, 2020 at 2:54 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Kamala Harris makes history Silver 5 719 August 21, 2020 at 10:31 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  The biggest crime in the history of humanity WinterHold 16 3213 September 22, 2017 at 7:04 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  History and some of the atrocities associated with it ErGingerbreadMandude 0 477 September 14, 2017 at 11:26 pm
Last Post: ErGingerbreadMandude
  America drops "largest non-nuclear bomb in history" on Afganistan Aroura 77 14682 April 17, 2017 at 3:19 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  History of the electoral college READ.... Brian37 20 2728 November 15, 2016 at 3:09 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
  No wonder students don't know history... Minimalist 21 6082 July 5, 2014 at 8:27 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  History and the use of religion by political powers KichigaiNeko 23 6295 January 4, 2014 at 9:25 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
Video A thousand years of bloody English history Cyberman 1 1050 October 7, 2013 at 8:20 pm
Last Post: bennyboy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)