Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2026, 11:38 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 15, 2015 at 12:26 am)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Well, I know I have done well when even the great Minimalist is forced to give up his usual profanity-laced one-line responses and actually dig for a more substantive response on the Internet.

Nah, that was for the normal and sane people on the board.  You, are still just a dumb fuck spouting the same old nonsense over and over.  You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.

You're quite beyond hope.  In your case, the fucking bible probably is about all you can comprehend.

And his only source of "proof" for the supposed "facts".
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 14, 2015 at 11:40 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 14, 2015 at 11:20 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: I still haven't seen any facts, let alone five of them.

The Minimal Facts are:

1. Jesus died by crucifixion
2. Jesus' disciples believed that He rose and appeared to them
3. Saul, the persecutor of the Church, was suddenly changed
4. James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, was suddenly changed
5. Jesus' tomb was found to be empty

Do you have a theory about what happened that accounts for all five?

If so, we need to give it careful consideration. Thanks.

Not one of those things is a fact, let alone a minimal one, so I don't need a "theory" about even one. Even if I gave over to all of them as facts, they wouldn't prove anything about the Christ being god. I hope the circle will close itself off when I say you haven't even proven Christ existed, let alone your assertion that he was crucified to begin with, but luckily my hope isn't too great. You're welcome.
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 15, 2015 at 12:42 am)Spooky Wrote:
(July 15, 2015 at 12:26 am)Minimalist Wrote: Nah, that was for the normal and sane people on the board.  You, are still just a dumb fuck spouting the same old nonsense over and over.  You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.

You're quite beyond hope.  In your case, the fucking bible probably is about all you can comprehend.

And his only source of "proof" for the supposed "facts".

There are some people who are so far gone that they believe anything.  This asshole should stick to Mother Goose and his fucking bible.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(June 24, 2015 at 10:43 pm)Stimbo Wrote: 1. Obi-Wan Kenobi died in a lightsabre duel.
2. Kenobi's apprentice and former master saw he had risen and appeared to them.
3. Darth Vader, the persecutor of the Jedi, was suddenly changed.
4. Han Solo, the sceptical pilot for Kenobi, was suddenly changed.
5. Kenobi's robes were found to be empty.

Spit Coffee  My God!!!! that was so PERFECT!!

I have to hug you  Cuddle
ALL PRAISE THE ONE TRUE GOD ZALGO


Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
A lot of people suddenly change. Getting shot in the head will do that. Does that make the gunman God?
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
You can tell someone is bullshitting right from the start when they think they can prove things happened - word one of the title.
You can gather good evidence to support the claim, but you can't ever prove it. Proof is for mathematics, not science, certainly not for history and absurd for ancient history.

Using the OPs fallacious methodology, you'd have absolute "proof" that alien abductions happen, which would be overwhelmingly more concrete than this pupported resurrection.
1. Lots of people believe to have seen space aliens
2. Many have dedicated their lives to this belief. Why would they do this if it wasn't true?
3. Alien abductions have been reported in serious newspapers, why would they lie?
4. UFOs have been seen on radar screen.
5. UFO debris has been found.
6. We even know of different types of aliens.
7. The X-files was a documentary, not fiction. (This one may sound stupid, but this is actually totally analogous what we are dealing with in this thread)

etc etc. Mixing up beliefs with evidence, throwing in unsubstantiated evidence with the occasional substantiated evidence, mixing terminologies (UFO with alien)


If historians used this methodology, history lessons at school would be, rather ironically, like watching the History Channel.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 15, 2015 at 12:26 am)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Well, I know I have done well when even the great Minimalist is forced to give up his usual profanity-laced one-line responses and actually dig for a more substantive response on the Internet.

Nah, that was for the normal and sane people on the board.  You, are still just a dumb fuck spouting the same old nonsense over and over.  You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.

You're quite beyond hope.  In your case, the fucking bible probably is about all you can comprehend.

[Image: compcoff.gif]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 15, 2015 at 12:42 am)Spooky Wrote:
(July 15, 2015 at 12:26 am)Minimalist Wrote: Nah, that was for the normal and sane people on the board.  You, are still just a dumb fuck spouting the same old nonsense over and over.  You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.

You're quite beyond hope.  In your case, the fucking bible probably is about all you can comprehend.

And his only source of "proof" for the supposed "facts".

Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, Lucian, Mara Bar Serapion, The Talmud...

And you have?




<crickets>
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jesus' resurrection was prophesized? Fake Messiah 28 7135 December 2, 2025 at 7:37 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 8335 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 28118 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 47797 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 29221 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 22547 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 64991 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 56240 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 35988 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 693169 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)