Posts: 1891
Threads: 53
Joined: December 13, 2014
Reputation:
35
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 12:42 am
(July 15, 2015 at 12:26 am)Minimalist Wrote: Quote:Well, I know I have done well when even the great Minimalist is forced to give up his usual profanity-laced one-line responses and actually dig for a more substantive response on the Internet.
Nah, that was for the normal and sane people on the board. You, are still just a dumb fuck spouting the same old nonsense over and over. You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.
You're quite beyond hope. In your case, the fucking bible probably is about all you can comprehend.
And his only source of "proof" for the supposed "facts".
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Posts: 7085
Threads: 69
Joined: September 11, 2012
Reputation:
84
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 12:51 am
(July 14, 2015 at 11:40 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: (July 14, 2015 at 11:20 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: I still haven't seen any facts, let alone five of them.
The Minimal Facts are:
1. Jesus died by crucifixion
2. Jesus' disciples believed that He rose and appeared to them
3. Saul, the persecutor of the Church, was suddenly changed
4. James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, was suddenly changed
5. Jesus' tomb was found to be empty
Do you have a theory about what happened that accounts for all five?
If so, we need to give it careful consideration. Thanks.
Not one of those things is a fact, let alone a minimal one, so I don't need a "theory" about even one. Even if I gave over to all of them as facts, they wouldn't prove anything about the Christ being god. I hope the circle will close itself off when I say you haven't even proven Christ existed, let alone your assertion that he was crucified to begin with, but luckily my hope isn't too great. You're welcome.
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
Posts: 29101
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
154
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 12:54 am
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2015 at 12:56 am by robvalue.)
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 1:39 am
(July 15, 2015 at 12:42 am)Spooky Wrote: (July 15, 2015 at 12:26 am)Minimalist Wrote: Nah, that was for the normal and sane people on the board. You, are still just a dumb fuck spouting the same old nonsense over and over. You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.
You're quite beyond hope. In your case, the fucking bible probably is about all you can comprehend.
And his only source of "proof" for the supposed "facts".
There are some people who are so far gone that they believe anything. This asshole should stick to Mother Goose and his fucking bible.
Posts: 19670
Threads: 178
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
91
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 6:12 am
Posts: 496
Threads: 18
Joined: January 17, 2013
Reputation:
16
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 6:41 am
(June 24, 2015 at 10:43 pm)Stimbo Wrote: 1. Obi-Wan Kenobi died in a lightsabre duel.
2. Kenobi's apprentice and former master saw he had risen and appeared to them.
3. Darth Vader, the persecutor of the Jedi, was suddenly changed.
4. Han Solo, the sceptical pilot for Kenobi, was suddenly changed.
5. Kenobi's robes were found to be empty.
 My God!!!! that was so PERFECT!!
I have to hug you
ALL PRAISE THE ONE TRUE GOD ZALGO
Posts: 29101
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
154
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 6:43 am
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2015 at 6:43 am by robvalue.)
A lot of people suddenly change. Getting shot in the head will do that. Does that make the gunman God?
Posts: 736
Threads: 38
Joined: December 3, 2013
Reputation:
10
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 7:08 am
You can tell someone is bullshitting right from the start when they think they can prove things happened - word one of the title.
You can gather good evidence to support the claim, but you can't ever prove it. Proof is for mathematics, not science, certainly not for history and absurd for ancient history.
Using the OPs fallacious methodology, you'd have absolute "proof" that alien abductions happen, which would be overwhelmingly more concrete than this pupported resurrection.
1. Lots of people believe to have seen space aliens
2. Many have dedicated their lives to this belief. Why would they do this if it wasn't true?
3. Alien abductions have been reported in serious newspapers, why would they lie?
4. UFOs have been seen on radar screen.
5. UFO debris has been found.
6. We even know of different types of aliens.
7. The X-files was a documentary, not fiction. (This one may sound stupid, but this is actually totally analogous what we are dealing with in this thread)
etc etc. Mixing up beliefs with evidence, throwing in unsubstantiated evidence with the occasional substantiated evidence, mixing terminologies (UFO with alien)
If historians used this methodology, history lessons at school would be, rather ironically, like watching the History Channel.
Posts: 2447
Threads: 19
Joined: May 13, 2015
Reputation:
8
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 7:14 am
(July 15, 2015 at 12:26 am)Minimalist Wrote: Quote:Well, I know I have done well when even the great Minimalist is forced to give up his usual profanity-laced one-line responses and actually dig for a more substantive response on the Internet.
Nah, that was for the normal and sane people on the board. You, are still just a dumb fuck spouting the same old nonsense over and over. You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.
You're quite beyond hope. In your case, the fucking bible probably is about all you can comprehend.
Posts: 2447
Threads: 19
Joined: May 13, 2015
Reputation:
8
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 15, 2015 at 7:20 am
(July 15, 2015 at 12:42 am)Spooky Wrote: (July 15, 2015 at 12:26 am)Minimalist Wrote: Nah, that was for the normal and sane people on the board. You, are still just a dumb fuck spouting the same old nonsense over and over. You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.
You're quite beyond hope. In your case, the fucking bible probably is about all you can comprehend.
And his only source of "proof" for the supposed "facts".
Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, Lucian, Mara Bar Serapion, The Talmud...
And you have?
<crickets>
|