Greetings,I commence open challenge to anyone

[Cyberman]

Jesus said it's only offence if you brake any of these rules,Copying work for the sake of God's glory is no sin.

Atheist Forums doesn't give a flying fox. Our plagiarism rule states quite clearly:

Plagiarism is not allowed. We consider plagiarism to be the act of posting another person's words and trying to pass them off as original, or failing to properly cite their source. Academic integrity is important to many of the members here, and it is only fair to give credit where it is due. When members quote from a source other than themselves, they should use citations, links, and names / references where possible.

You agreed to the Rules when you signed up. You will abide by them or you can leave. Your choice.

[The Valkyrie]

This ex Catholic won't bother.

Every time I've encountered someone who makes such claims they invariably end up making stuff up, claiming stuff is taken out of context and that sort of thing, and we end up dancing in circles.

And asking someone for their email address?

Yeah, that's gonna happen.

[abaris]

How about for copy/paste and passing it off as his/her own?

Could be the same idiot being kicked out from TA and having a go here before he got another boot. So, sock's another possibility.

[Grehoman Ebenezer]

message me your email address because,I Can't do it here,since now I am restricted and this would make me very very slow down.

I don't think so buddy. I'm not going to debate you in front of no one.(Well,friend If you can't debate in private,then I won't here because am not wasting time)  There is no point, I can tell you are not the type that knows his stuff too well but just repeats what he heard from others(didn't you learn from other's).

[Exian]

The difference between the Grand Canyon and Mount Rushmore is obvious—one is designed, one is not.

Hahaha I'll just let this one sink in...

....

....

....it's not gonna sink in, is it?

Can we go back to this for a second? I'm having a hard time believing this is an argument for ID. And you copy/pasted it, so that means you aren't even the only one using it!?!

If I were in a debate with you, you being of the stance that some God designed everything, and you trotted out "The difference between the Grand Canyon and Mount Rushmore is obvious—one is designed, one is not" in response, I would say "The difference between the Grand Canyon and Mount Rushmore is obvious—one is designed, one is not." Get it?

[Grehoman Ebenezer]

This ones priceless. Not only is it a strawman, but it's a bit too wordy for a Christian's liking. Lets see if we can reduce it some: Magic. There we go. Now pay me money so you don't go to hell.

Also, are you aware that Dr. House there is an atheist? Or was that your point?

I can assure you,that the word used magically is an exaggeration.

---

Hahaha I'll just let this one sink in...

....

....

....it's not gonna sink in, is it?

Can we go back to this for a second? I'm having a hard time believing this is an argument for ID. And you copy/pasted it, so that means you aren't even the only one using it!?!

If I were in a debate with you, you being of the stance that some God designed everything, and you trotted out "The difference between the Grand Canyon and Mount Rushmore is obvious—one is designed, one is not" in response, I would say "The difference between the Grand Canyon and Mount Rushmore is obvious—one is designed, one is not." Get it?

Can I message you? since am restricted.

[LastPoet]

You can massage me.

[Exian]

You can message me, but I'll find the extra step to paste everything we say there to this thread a bit annoying.

[Mystic]

Grehoman Ebenezer. In school, they teach us to put things in our own words.

Here, even when I open subjects I've discussed before, I phrase it differently, I try to do that every time.

It shows you understand things that way. If you copy paste in school, you get banned or a zero (and you get in trouble), the severity of it is depending if you in university or high school.

Also, I wouldn't argue against a religion too much. I use to have 28 logical arguments against Quran that seemed logical to me. I made a document about it and posted it on Muslim forums.

So sometimes, you have no one but yourself to solve your own problems with a religion. In that case, asking a scholar won't help if they themselves never thought about the problems you came up with.

It reached about 40 problems at one point.

[Grehoman Ebenezer]

Grehoman Ebenezer. In school, they teach us to put things in our own words.

Here, even when I open subjects I've discussed before, I phrase it differently, I try to do that every time.

It shows you understand things that way. If you copy paste in school, you get banned or a zero (and you get in trouble), the severity of it is depending if you in university or high school.

Also, I wouldn't argue for or against a religion too much. I use to have 28 logical arguments against Quran that seemed logical to me. I made a document about it and posted it on Muslim forums.

So sometimes, you have no one but yourself to solve your own problems with a religion. In that case, asking a scholar won't help if they themselves never thought about the problems you came up with.

It reached about 40 problems at one point.

Since am a slow typer and because even If I took my time and typed,you may ignore so I find it a waste of time and I can't copy and paste the answer's here,and show it to you.You want me to prove the Quran and Islam is false,but you said you were against the quran " I use to have 28 logical arguments against Quran that seemed logical to me." so I wouldn't bother.

{snip}

Moderator Notice
Please, again, read the rules. Do not post links until you've been a member for thirty days and have made thirty posts (with few exceptions). You agreed to the rules when you signed up for the forum. One more infraction, and we'll have to take heavier measures