Here's why Creatards might be right

[LostLocke]

theory : we and everything we see around us different species of plants and animals perfectly coordinated are nothing but the random inevitable result of an explosion

havent we tested this theory ?

No - Nobody claims that it is an inevitable result.

And definitely not the result of an "explosion".

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

oh so your saying before the big bang there was some kind of blueprint or organized DNA , hmmm  pretty inpressive for unthinking exploding matter ...

If by "blueprint" you mean "this is the way that particles interact, period", then yes, I suppose. Otherise, not on your life.

That's what I'd call a design
That is the universal law of the universe, "this is the way that particles interact,period". You're welcome,scientists searching for that ultimate law.
Science does the job of discovering why this is the way it is. Science cannot know how this universal law of the universe came into being.

It's almost as if someone or something set a base as a design and the world sort of build itself on that base.

[jenny1972]

ugh this big bang religion is just as dumb as all the others .....

Hahahahahahaha.... that's a good one!
Oh wait, you weren't joking?

no the idea that a random cosmic explosion produced a huge variety of completely different complex living organisms all living together in perfect harmony is very believeable

[The Grand Nudger]

Evolution produced a wide variety of complex beings...Jenny.....  There was a bit of a lull from one to the other, lol.

[Esquilax]

Hahahahahahaha.... that's a good one!
Oh wait, you weren't joking?

no the idea that a random cosmic explosion produced a huge variety of completely different complex living organisms all living together in perfect harmony is very believeable

Things that are a misrepresentation of the big bang theory have been bolded by me.

Are you embarrassed yet? That's literally all the words that you said about the big bang.

[jenny1972]

hypothesis :

intelligent beings have created new things out of other material

has this been tested ?( as i type on my computer keyboard )

It's being tested as we speak.  It gets tested all day long.  I get the feeling that you think this leads somewhere that it doesn't.

yes im suggesting that maybe human intelligence isnt the apex creative intelligence in the universe based on science that is highly unlikely

[Esquilax]

That's what I'd call a design
That is the universal law of the universe, "this is the way that particles interact,period". You're welcome,scientists searching for that ultimate law.
Science does the job of discovering why this is the way it is. Science cannot know how this universal law of the universe came into being.

It's almost as if someone or something set a base as a design and the world sort of build itself on that base.

Why would you make that leap? Without evidence, why would you decide that the laws of physics are proscriptive, rather than descriptive?

[robvalue]

I think you missed out ... a few steps there jenny.

Like however many billions of years. No one is suggesting cats, dogs and humans came flying fully-formed out of the Big Bang!

I'd suggest some research on the subjects of both the Big Bang and evolution, which are entirely separate. Trying to dismiss the whole of science with a wave of a hand and replacing it with goddidit is the danger of this kind of thinking. Science is hard, but it actually explains stuff.

Pool: I'm afraid I can't gain anything more from what you say than "looks to me that it's designed, so it is designed". I've tried to glean more than this, but you'll have to help us out.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

That's what I'd call a design
That is the universal law of the universe, "this is the way that particles interact,period". You're welcome,scientists searching for that ultimate law.
Science does the job of discovering why this is the way it is. Science cannot know how this universal law of the universe came into being.

It's almost as if someone or something set a base as a design and the world sort of build itself on that base.

Why would you make that leap? Without evidence, why would you decide that the laws of physics are proscriptive, rather than descriptive?

But I'm right though aren't I?
It's impossible to determine how this universal law of the universe came into being. To assume that it was created(sorry,designed) by something or someone would be the most logical thing to do

[robvalue]

There we go! Assume.

You just made our point for us

None of us are claiming to have the answer.

No it's not logical, because it is the fallacy of composition: drawing conclusions about a whole based on observations about its parts.