Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 3:03 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
(November 9, 2015 at 6:29 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(November 9, 2015 at 1:37 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: When the conclusion of an ontological argument is all you have to say that a God exists, it's impossible to tell whether or not this conflicts with reality because there is no other evidence.

Are you suggesting that the Pythagorean theorem must be empirically verified before it can be accepted as true? Clearly that is not the case. Physical measurements, no matter how precise, only yield approximate values, not the absolute values that define mathematical results. The truth of the theorem does not rely on ‘other’ evidence nor is other evidence necessary.

There are multiple proofs of the Pythagorean theorem that show conclusively that it is valid. Are you seriously comparing mathematical theorems to ontological arguments?

http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/emt668/emt668...orean.html
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
(November 9, 2015 at 1:34 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Name three facts about the world not subject to sensory verification, please.

1) Nothing can both exist and not exist in all ways
2) Each thing is the same as itself and different from another.
3) Something either exists or it doesn't.
4) Out of nothing, nothing comes.

Should I go on?
Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
Pure mathematics is entirely abstract, there is no requirement or indeed guarantee that it will in any way correlate with reality.

As it happens, much of it does correlate well with reality; at least closely enough to give results that are suitably accurate for the task at hand. But for example with Pythagorus' Theorom, it is dealing with a purely theoretical perfectly formed triangle. It makes no claim that such a thing actually exists in reality.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
You should probably read up on quantum mechanics, Chad. It refutes all three claims.

But yes, do go on.

Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
Quote: The stand taken by Esquilax against the 5W and his reasons for opposing them demonstrates that for many, no form of evidence would ever suffice.

Oh, fuck off Chad.  If your 'god' wanted to prove himself I'm sure he could manage it.  The bigger question then would become not, does he exist, but is such a (as depicted in your precious bible) petty, murderous, vindictive, being worthy of "worship."

Since you can't establish existence the rest of it does not matter.  Get back to me if you ever find real evidence.
Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
(November 9, 2015 at 8:03 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(November 9, 2015 at 1:34 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Name three facts about the world not subject to sensory verification, please.

1) Nothing can both exist and not exist in all ways
2) Each thing is the same as itself and different from another.
3) Something either exists or it doesn't.
4) Out of nothing, nothing comes.

Should I go on?

#4 is suspect and raises more questions than it answers.  Most importantly, what do you mean by "nothing", how does that compare to what others intend by "nothing", and, was there ever truly "nothing"?
Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
(November 9, 2015 at 8:03 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(November 9, 2015 at 1:34 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Name three facts about the world not subject to sensory verification, please.

1) Nothing can both exist and not exist in all ways
2) Each thing is the same as itself and different from another.
3) Something either exists or it doesn't.
4) Out of nothing, nothing comes.

Should I go on?

1 and 3 are equivalent. Nevertheless, quantum mechanics seem to tell us otherwise.

2 may be true logically, but in the real world, this may pose certain practical issues regarding identity and the self.

4 is logically true.
Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
(November 9, 2015 at 12:42 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: he has hardened himself against reason

So glad that you can so exactly and incisively determine what is going on in another's head via the medium of an internet message board. [Image: free-rolleye-smileys-323.gif]
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
(November 9, 2015 at 8:06 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: You should probably read up on quantum mechanics, Chad. It refutes all three claims.

But yes, do go on.

“What the (Bleep) Do You Know.” Since its discovery, quantum mechanics has been used to justify the claims of New Age hucksters, so-called non-dualists, proponents of idealism, and various mystical beliefs. Disagreements of interpretation abound. This doesn’t not make you wrong; it only means that you should take pause before making pronouncements about what QM research does and does not reveal. As a layman, I have only a basic understanding of it; the physics classes I took as an architect only touched on the basics. While I follow with interest more recent discoveries like quantum erasure and retro-causality, I generally steer clear of relying on the findings of natural science to inform metaphysical issues. Doing so puts the cart before the horse.

Fortunately it doesn’t take an advanced degree in physics to recognize the incoherence of the self-refuting position you have taken. The findings of all natural science inquiries, including QM, presuppose the fundamental principles I listed. If the results of a QM experiment were to invalidate the first principles of its own inquiry then its own results are invalidated.

That leaves open the question of what to make of quantum oddities and puzzles. Nothing prevents the existence of contraries in a particular provided they are not contrary in the same respect. For example suffering is contrary to joy and yet an athlete can suffer greatly during a marathon and still experience the joy of achievement. I am not suggesting that I know how to apply that idea to any one quantum puzzle. I only bring it up to suggest how such puzzles can be resolved without falling into self-refutation.
Reply
RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
Delicate Wrote:
Kitan Wrote:The image used in the beginning already proves what a joke the article is to follow.

[Image: the-new-philistinism.jpg]

Most atheists have read the bible, for most of us were raised in religious institutions.  Even many atheists never introduced to religion in their lives, except to be taught as the myth it is by their parents, have also read the bible.

I find that's a myth. Many atheists like to claim to be ex-Christians, but they don't have even the basic rudimentary knowledge of religion and end up attacking strawmen.

As the rest of the article will illustrate quite amusingly.

How do you find that it's a myth? What's your sample size out of the total number of atheists?

I was a devout Pentecostal, spoke in tongues, read the Bible cover-to-cover twice; and the NT more times than I can recall. However, I suspect that you would find that I don't have even the basic rudimentary knowledge of religion because I didn't happen to belong to one of the sects you're most familiar with. I'd like to be wrong about that, though.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How atheists can enjoy religion Ahriman 100 10385 September 5, 2021 at 7:22 pm
Last Post: Todji812
  Religion hurts homosexuality but homosexuality kills religion? RozKek 43 12019 March 30, 2016 at 2:46 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Are all atheists this ill-informed about religion? Delicate 860 165463 January 19, 2016 at 12:03 am
Last Post: IATIA
  Terrorism has no religion but religion brings terrorism. Islam is NOT peaceful. bussta33 13 5475 January 16, 2016 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Criticizing Islam is racist? Lemonvariable72 128 20319 November 5, 2015 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Religion's affect outside of religion Heat 67 21259 September 28, 2015 at 9:45 pm
Last Post: TheRocketSurgeon
Rainbow Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion" CristW 288 58257 November 21, 2014 at 4:09 pm
Last Post: DramaQueen
  If atheists treated Christians like many Christians treat atheists... StealthySkeptic 24 11773 August 25, 2014 at 11:02 pm
Last Post: Darkstar
  Thiests: This how atheists see religion Gooders1002 22 8906 May 5, 2013 at 5:35 am
Last Post: Confused Ape
  Atheists are pagan worshipers who started another religion. bjhulk 42 28768 February 16, 2011 at 7:29 pm
Last Post: Calmedady



Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)