What other reasons? Isn't it for self-defense only?
Well, here he talks about guns.
http://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/th...-revisited
Well, here he talks about guns.
http://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/th...-revisited
Harris' take on the recent events in Paris
|
What other reasons? Isn't it for self-defense only?
Well, here he talks about guns. http://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/th...-revisited RE: Harris' take on the recent events in Paris
November 17, 2015 at 11:38 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 11:39 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Not only that even if it were not a Martial Art: it's good for health and fitness.
What about Tai Chi?
RE: Harris' take on the recent events in Paris
November 17, 2015 at 11:53 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 11:54 am by Excited Penguin.)
Well, ok, but we were initially talking about brazilian Jiu-Jitsu not about other forms of martial arts.
RE: Harris' take on the recent events in Paris
November 17, 2015 at 11:54 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 11:55 am by Excited Penguin.)
And again, even with Tai chi, in a world where you wouldn't need it, it wouldn't even exist, at least not in that form.
Yeah well you made the argument that the purpose of Martial Arts overall was for self-defence.
Yeah Jiu-Jitsu is primarily self defense but when I heard him talk about it on a podcast he talked a lot about other reasons and I don't even remember much about him talking about the primary reason being self defense. He talked about how it made him more healthy and disciplined a lot IIRC. So basically, that's why I didn't think of Jiu-jitsu as a reason for him having to protect himself. (November 17, 2015 at 11:56 am)Evie Wrote: Yeah well you made the argument that the purpose of Martial Arts overall was for self-defence. Of course it's to protect himself. I don't think he would have to spell that out, and apparently neither does he. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|