Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 3:15 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
pop morality
RE: pop morality
Reply
RE: pop morality
(March 21, 2016 at 7:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Something that's really kind of funny is how a lot of theists still view science as this weirdly nefarious, clandestine, dishonest thing that is basically a stand-in for religion, just with a different name.  It's not.  That would be Scientology, which is a particularly despicable form of woo.

No, science is a process.  An incredibly simple and logical one.  Observe.  Question.  Hypothesize.  Experiment.  Apply the results to reality.  Do they match the hypothesis?  If so, is there anything else that the results show?  If not, why not?  Hypothesize.  Experiment.  Etc.

We don't have faith in science.  Science isn't a deity.  We understand and trust in the process, but still realize that it's only as sound as its weakest links - the humans engaging in it.  That's why peer review is a necessary step.  We also realize that the answers science provide are merely the best explanation given the evidence we currently possess.  Science never produces absolutes, which is something that seems to confound those that don't understand it.  It's never "That's just the way it is, period" but rather "According to observation, experimentation, a lot of math, and peer review, this is our best explanation."

But, when you have people who don't understand science, who view it through the lens of religion (binary), and who are more than willing to swallow wholesale what people who have a similar distrust of science say (climate change deniers, Higgs deniers, anti-vaxers, etc.), ignorance perpetuates itself under the guise of 'free thinking' and society itself suffers.

Yeah.. whateves.. see the above post.
Reply
RE: pop morality
(March 21, 2016 at 8:26 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:
Drich Wrote:Now again, to you is killing a baby a "positive" thing?

[Image: perfect_fried_egg_recipe_hero_landscape_...tQ.S0Q.g--]

Depends. Is this fried chicken?

You do know that the chicken egg (yolk) is a single cell right?
Reply
RE: pop morality
Reply
RE: pop morality
Reply
RE: pop morality
So how about it Kenobi???

Is Killing babies 'making a positive difference' to you???
Reply
RE: pop morality
(March 22, 2016 at 10:22 am)Drich Wrote: You do know that the chicken egg (yolk) is a single cell right?

If it's unfertilized.
Reply
RE: pop morality
(March 21, 2016 at 7:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Something that's really kind of funny is how a lot of theists still view science as this weirdly nefarious, clandestine, dishonest thing that is basically a stand-in for religion, just with a different name.  It's not.  That would be Scientology, which is a particularly despicable form of woo.

No, science is a process.  An incredibly simple and logical one.  Observe.  Question.  Hypothesize.  Experiment.  Apply the results to reality.  Do they match the hypothesis?  If so, is there anything else that the results show?  If not, why not?  Hypothesize.  Experiment.  Etc.

We don't have faith in science.  Science isn't a deity.  We understand and trust in the process, but still realize that it's only as sound as its weakest links - the humans engaging in it.  That's why peer review is a necessary step.  We also realize that the answers science provide are merely the best explanation given the evidence we currently possess.  Science never produces absolutes, which is something that seems to confound those that don't understand it.  It's never "That's just the way it is, period" but rather "According to observation, experimentation, a lot of math, and peer review, this is our best explanation."

But, when you have people who don't understand science, who view it through the lens of religion (binary), and who are more than willing to swallow wholesale what people who have a similar distrust of science say (climate change deniers, Higgs deniers, anti-vaxers, etc.), ignorance perpetuates itself under the guise of 'free thinking' and society itself suffers.

keep drinking the koolaide, that's right gulp it down. Ignore What I just showed you about how your faith in science is no different than a religious zealot's faith in his own religion is the exact same. (Your assumptions that black holes are scientific fact and not a theory.) Keep pretending that 'science' is always about demonstrable fact and does not ask for faith. That way when 'science' demands you believe in "X" what ever that maybe you will just hand your mind and faith right over without question. Just like those mindlessly following their own religions.. but different because the word 'God' and the Word 'Science' start with different letters and can't be the same even if the mindless adherence of it's followers is the same net result.
Reply
RE: pop morality
Gravity is a theory, you moron. The scientific meaning of the word is not the same as the layperson's. It doesn't mean guess or hunch or anything else without much substantiation.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: pop morality
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bibe Study 2: Questionable Morality Rhondazvous 30 9254 May 27, 2019 at 12:23 pm
Last Post: Vicki Q
  Christian morality delusions tackattack 87 27705 November 27, 2018 at 8:09 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Question to Theists About the Source of Morality GrandizerII 33 13599 January 8, 2016 at 7:39 pm
Last Post: Godscreated
  C.S. Lewis and the Argument From Morality Jenny A 15 9472 August 3, 2015 at 4:03 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  The questionable morality of Christianity (and Islam, for that matter) rado84 35 14091 July 21, 2015 at 9:01 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Stereotyping and morality Dontsaygoodnight 34 14717 March 20, 2015 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  You CAN game Christian morality RobbyPants 82 35176 March 12, 2015 at 3:39 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Challenge regarding Christian morality robvalue 170 68046 February 16, 2015 at 10:17 am
Last Post: Tonus
  The Prisoner's Dilemma and Objective/Subjective Morality RobbyPants 9 6145 December 17, 2014 at 9:41 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Atheist Morality vs Biblical Morality dyresand 46 22954 November 8, 2014 at 5:20 pm
Last Post: genkaus



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)