"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 4:47 pm
Thread Rating:
|
pop morality
|
 
More accurately, they hypothesized spin, based on observations of stars and accretion discs and were finally able to directly observe it, verifying the hypothesis.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
And, again, you keep saying I have FAITH (dun dun dunnnnn) in science that you're trying to conflate with theistic faith. No. That's not what it is at all. I've explained it several times to you. I believe in the process. Given time and resources, I could repeat their steps. I could self-verify, or, even better, find something new or contradictory. Science works because it's fluid. It's based on inquiry and challenging perceptions. It is wholly unlike religion, and your inability to understand that merely highlights your own ignorance.
You're trying to paint me as a different kind of theist, and that's simply laughable.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
RE: pop morality
March 22, 2016 at 12:54 pm
(This post was last modified: March 22, 2016 at 12:54 pm by Drich.)
(March 22, 2016 at 12:54 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: And, again, you keep saying I have FAITH (dun dun dunnnnn) in science that you're trying to conflate with theistic faith. No. That's not what it is at all. I've explained it several times to you. I believe in the process. Given time and resources, I could repeat their steps. I could self-verify, or, even better, find something new or contradictory. Science works because it's fluid. It's based on inquiry and challenging perceptions. It is wholly unlike religion, and your inability to understand that merely highlights your own ignorance. what's laughable is that dispite the evidence, (ironically enough) you cant see yourself as a different kind of theist.. If you claim their are two totally different types of faith concerning religion and science then please demonstrate them. That what a 'scientist' would do would he not?
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
