Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2026, 4:51 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ban the Burkini
#81
RE: Ban the Burkini
(September 5, 2016 at 6:21 am)Tazzycorn Wrote:
(September 4, 2016 at 10:40 am)RozKek Wrote: I do not disagree nor agree because I haven't put my thought into this at all, but from what I've heard,  reporting abuse isn't always easy. If you're not allowed to wear it, the people who opress women into wearing it can't really do anything about it, whereas reporting abuse can make it worse for the reporter.

They can and will. There's a lot less visibility of muslim women on streets after burqa bans have been implemented. Those who come from groups sensible enough not to require that particular piece of clothing are still around, but the women from cultures that enforce its wearing are now essentially trapped within their homes 24/7.

The idea of the burqa and the misogyny behind it must be dealt with, but a blanket ban without trying to expose and educate the culture behind it is not the way to go.

And further controlling women by dictating what they wear is most certainly not the answer.
If The Flintstones have taught us anything, it's that pelicans can be used to mix cement.

-Homer Simpson
Reply
#82
RE: Ban the Burkini
(September 4, 2016 at 10:40 am)RozKek Wrote: I do not disagree nor agree because I haven't put my thought into this at all, but from what I've heard,  reporting abuse isn't always easy. If you're not allowed to wear it, the people who opress women into wearing it can't really do anything about it, whereas reporting abuse can make it worse for the reporter.

No, reporting abuse isn't always easy; one might say that it's never easy. However, just because something isn't easy to do, doesn't mean we should be banning some secondary action (i.e. the wearing of specific clothes). If anything, we should be making it easier for people to report abuse, by giving them protections, ensuring they are looked after, etc.

Additionally, this ban might actually make things worse for the women being forced to wear these item of clothing, in two ways I can think of:

1) The husband might insist they wear the burqa anyway, thus forcing the wife to break the law. Given that they believe they are following "God's law", I don't find this scenario hard to believe.

2) The husband may force the wife to stay at home to avoid being in public while wearing the burqa. This would limit the contact the wife has with other people, and limit her chances at reporting the abuse.
Reply
#83
RE: Ban the Burkini
(September 6, 2016 at 11:16 am)Tiberius Wrote:
(September 4, 2016 at 10:40 am)RozKek Wrote: I do not disagree nor agree because I haven't put my thought into this at all, but from what I've heard,  reporting abuse isn't always easy. If you're not allowed to wear it, the people who opress women into wearing it can't really do anything about it, whereas reporting abuse can make it worse for the reporter.

No, reporting abuse isn't always easy; one might say that it's never easy. However, just because something isn't easy to do, doesn't mean we should be banning some secondary action (i.e. the wearing of specific clothes). If anything, we should be making it easier for people to report abuse, by giving them protections, ensuring they are looked after, etc.

Additionally, this ban might actually make things worse for the women being forced to wear these item of clothing, in two ways I can think of:

1) The husband might insist they wear the burqa anyway, thus forcing the wife to break the law. Given that they believe they are following "God's law", I don't find this scenario hard to believe.

2) The husband may force the wife to stay at home to avoid being in public while wearing the burqa. This would limit the contact the wife has with other people, and limit her chances at reporting the abuse.

Yeah, I agree. This seems to be a bit of a difficult problem to solve :/
Reply
#84
RE: Ban the Burkini
I don't think it's a particularly difficult problem to solve at all really. It all depends on how "far" you want the solution to go. If you want to solve the problem of women being oppressed, then you make it illegal to force women people to wear items of clothing against their will, and make it easier for people to report abuse, offering protections for those who do.

Will it prevent all oppression? No, but point me to a law or policy that has done that. I'm of the opinion that whilst eradicating all oppression / crime is a worthy goal, we must accept that it will never happen, and the focus should instead be on limiting the oppression / crime without simultaneously impeding people's human rights.
Reply
#85
RE: Ban the Burkini
I think also education in public schools should focus on emphasizing the fact that the precepts of a liberal democratic society are more important than any one member, group, or faith.

Reply
#86
RE: Ban the Burkini
(September 6, 2016 at 11:16 am)Tiberius Wrote: 1) The husband might insist they wear the burqa anyway, thus forcing the wife to break the law. Given that they believe they are following "God's law", I don't find this scenario hard to believe.

2) The husband may force the wife to stay at home to avoid being in public while wearing the burqa. This would limit the contact the wife has with other people, and limit her chances at reporting the abuse.

There's a third reason I pointed out before. The ones wearing that garb wether voluntarily or by coercing are named and shamed in public by police forces ripping their cloths off.

And make no mistake, this isn't an altruistic move in the name of women's liberation. If it was, they would enforce it on orthodox jews and christians also. Which won't happen, since they aren't on the receiving end of populous rage right now.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#87
RE: Ban the Burkini
(August 25, 2016 at 8:29 pm)Jesster Wrote: [Image: ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.washingtonpost.co...if&op=noop]
It should be down to what the woman wants.
But it does seem that when the male muslims decide what to wear to the beach they don't all dress like they came from the 14th Century.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#88
RE: Ban the Burkini
(September 6, 2016 at 1:34 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(August 25, 2016 at 8:29 pm)Jesster Wrote: [Image: ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.washingtonpost.co...if&op=noop]
It should be down to what the woman wants.
But it does seem that when the male muslims decide what to wear to the beach they don't all dress like they came from the 14th Century.

Yeeah..I'm not really a fan of that little gif, because it equates forcibly making women wear something regardless of their consent, to attire that anyone (male or female for that matter) can wear whenever they like.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#89
RE: Ban the Burkini
Tres Leches Wrote:It's fine with me if governments ban Muslim-approved swimwear on public beaches.
Western women who visit Muslim countries are made to cover their female bodies and hair while in public.
When in Rome, do as the Romans.

I also find it odd that you'll see women wearing attire that completely covers their "tempting" female bodies while they're accompanied by men who wear whatever the hell they want.

Nah, I'm good with banning burqa swimsuits.

There are plenty of Muslim majority countries that don't require Western women to cover their hair. There are even some Muslim majority countries that don't require Muslim women to cover their hair.

But let's be like the ones that do, eh?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
#90
RE: Ban the Burkini
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  California High Capacity Magazine Ban Shot Down. onlinebiker 73 16608 August 25, 2020 at 1:37 am
Last Post: Peebothuhlu
  BREAKING:The exclusion of the UK and non-Schengen countries like Ireland from the ban WinterHold 6 2189 March 14, 2020 at 6:49 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  California ban on high capacity magazines declared unconstitutional popeyespappy 178 47355 May 3, 2019 at 10:11 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Baltimore poised to become first major city to ban privatization of water Aegon 9 2420 August 8, 2018 at 9:51 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  BREAKING: SCOTUS Upholds Trump Travel Ban A Theist 18 6608 June 27, 2018 at 7:30 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  "Kill the fetus" ban lifted in Ireland Kitan Etos 50 14565 May 28, 2018 at 11:44 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Trump's Muslim immigration ban includes green card holders Aegon 316 92654 February 17, 2017 at 6:03 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Trump Loses Travel Ban Appeal BrianSoddingBoru4 61 19552 February 10, 2017 at 11:24 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Judge Blocks Trump's Travel Ban BrianSoddingBoru4 5 1780 February 4, 2017 at 2:55 pm
Last Post: Kitan Etos
  SAG Awards, celebrities, against immigration ban Kitan Etos 0 980 February 1, 2017 at 1:51 am
Last Post: Kitan Etos



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)