christian school project

[Arkilogue]

Beither. Or noth.

See that's exactly what I was thinking: present it as my personal, changing/growing path of understanding of the universe and relationship with God. What ever is True (if any) can stand on it's own in the minds and hearts of other truth seekers (preservation). It will act as both solvent (destroyer) to false forms and catalytic (creator) to new ones. And if I don't make it an enjoyable read, people aren't going to enjoy reading it.

I will stand in the only authentic place I can, my own experience and what works for me. And if I can remain at this lowest place, even if everything I assert turns out to be true, then I will be safe from my own ego, un-inflated by the opinion of others. That is the real danger in this endeavor. Death is part and parcel of this life and if i earn a good one, then FIESTA! Throw the confetti!

I'm happy to be "wrong" and remain in idealogical spaces, looked upon as a lunatic. Can you imagine the avalanche a person would have to survive being even somewhat correct on something of this magnitude and importance in the lives of most people on earth? Privately it's a un-ending source of joy but publicly it's terrifying to me, people can be crazy, and I would/will have to walk the straight and narrow path between them. Dancing if I can help it!

The other danger I perceive comes from the firm belief that this schematic of the universe yields an implosive tech that can tap into it's torque/motion and potentially gain unlimited energy. Even/especially if I could produce a mathematic sentence describing it all, I wouldn't publish it. I would/will focus on the internal/spiritual application of this tech so there is less chance of destroying ourselves with it externally. I believe we have done so before.

[Cyberman]

On reflection, I was thinking more that one should not fake one's death, if one wishes to present such an event to the world.

[Whateverist]

I say the universe is an expression of just-so-ness.  What does calling it the actual God add to anything?

Does that give you a logical, predictive model of universal phenomenon we could check against actual universal phenomenon?

No what I prefer about my formulation is that it makes it clear that nothing of any use has been offered, rather than mislead myself or others the way yours does.  I've been on xtian sites where people would brag about being on a bike, closing their eyes and letting go of the handles .. you know .. turning it all over to God.  Maybe this is an example of the predictive powers you're offering?

[chimp3]

Well, that's some mighty fine proof. I suggest you start a religion.

The thought has crossed my mind. But I don't think I'm up to the responsibility for others and personal ego slaying it will absolutely require. Fame, fortune, celebrity and media circus, no thanks. I like my privacy and relative anonymity. If I start a religion those will be sacrificed and I'm not ready to give them up. The world is extremely noisy and I like peace and quiet....

I could always fake my death though.

Actually , you could start a religion and still maintain your privacy and relative anonymity. You might actually be lonely.

[chimp3]

Last Poets response to your previous comment was to sign language you are a loon. My comment to your response to Last Poets accusation is that you practice dumbfuckery at an epic level.

What the exact fuck is your problem Chump? I could list many scientific links supporting my above claim that quark matter is more metastable than atomic matter and will consume it, but you've shat on the game board enough.

Please, no more wiki links.

[Firefighter01]

You are not telling me anything here, you may have well said, "God is nice." Or "God never says shit".  I'm asking you, what the fuck is God? An alien?  A really big turtle that spans the universe? A Robot? That's the problem with Christians, they don't really know what the Hell they are worshipping.  They hide behind the God is Love, God is Pure bullshit.

Do you want the correct answer?  Maybe the school kid or what I believe to be a troll wants to have a dig first?

God is a noun: a person, place and thing. To us it is mostly place and thing. During inflation it spreads out and becomes the border conditions and shaping functions for the universes.

How about we stick with a thingy? All believers struggle with this, as there are no specific definitions for gods.  They are all invisible, silent, don't do anything and are undetectable.  Rather similar to nothing at all. 

Besides, how can you define something that is supposed to be all powerful & omniscient? As soon as you define it, you give it boundaries. Infinite things can't have boundaries.   All the thousands of gods do have something in common, though.  Not one has been proven to exist since the dawn of mankind.

[Arkilogue]

God is a noun: a person, place and thing. To us it is mostly place and thing. During inflation it spreads out and becomes the border conditions and shaping functions for the universes.

How about we stick with a thingy? All believers struggle with this, as there are no specific definitions for gods.  They are all invisible, silent, don't do anything and are undetectable.  Rather similar to nothing at all. 

Besides, how can you define something that is supposed to be all powerful & omniscient? As soon as you define it, you give it boundaries. Infinite things can't have boundaries.   All the thousands of gods do have something in common, though.  Not one has been proven to exist since the dawn of mankind.

Thing is good. God is the infinite thing that moved to make the finite no-thing space of the universe. In that voided space God "left behind" it's field nature and this gives everything mass. We call it the Higgs field.

[Arkilogue]

Does that give you a logical, predictive model of universal phenomenon we could check against actual universal phenomenon?

No what I prefer about my formulation is that it makes it clear that nothing of any use has been offered, rather than mislead myself or others the way yours does.  I've been on xtian sites where people would brag about being on a bike, closing their eyes and letting go of the handles .. you know .. turning it all over to God.  Maybe this is an example of the predictive powers you're offering?

No, the predictions are geometric and unfold from God by it's own relativistic spatial relationships as an infinite thing. It's all around itself equally in all directions, it is at the center of itself equally at every point and it exist in whole as a field in equilibrium. This quantizes into a simultaneously arrising sphere/point/field structural relationship and as a vibrating container, patterns directly for atomic anatomy and behavior.

There are 3 more cascading steps that unfold several overlapping fields in motion inside the sphere. There is an inner strongly connected field, a middle weakly connected field surrounding the strong and these are horizontal in motion (rotating ring torus). Surrounding those is a vertical EM field (pillar torus) and underneath them all is a static lattice field at/as the floor of vibration (as explained in 1st paragraph). 4 basic field forces in the universe that affect material behavior and organization.

[Cyberman]

Yeah; well I for one won't take anything you say seriously on pseudo-complex issues when you can't even use the correct form of basic words such as "its".

[Arkilogue]

Yeah; well I for one won't take anything you say seriously on pseudo-complex issues when you can't even use the correct form of basic words such as "its".

God forbid you ever add an apostrophe and invalidate everything you've ever asserted.