How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?

[Catholic_Lady]

Lay out any facts you think I missed.  What other obnoxious views do you hold?

as above. you wrongly assume all forced sex is not consensual sex and therefore rape. you wrongfully judged me and those who would find 'forced sex normal' for most of the world as rapists. your judgement is based off you own version of right and wrong and because you could not see a legit form of forced sex you assumed it was all wrong.. Hence my usage of the term self righteous when describing you and your failed judgement.

Is that a big enough 'miss' for ya?

How would you describe forced sex?

[Drich]

Let's pretend for a second that I may, just maybe 4 or maybe 5 steps ahead of you in the conversation, and the reason what i am currently saying doesn't make sense to you, is because you are not actively involved in the conversation, but just adding statler and waldorf type commentary from the side lines based on someone else's misunderstanding???

How much more annoying do you think that would be?

What makes you think I'm not reading your drivel, but simply find most of it unworthy of comment?

Only an idiot would assume that the lack of commentary means a member isn't following along.

If that annoys you, Cupcake, tough shit. Get yourself a helmet and shut the fuck up crying about big bad meanies on the Internets.

Awe... Somebody Jelly.

lol, more like, someone gusty.

Yes, you'll have to ask what that means.

what a moron..

i know your not reading anything.. which is why I very plainly pointed out you are making commentary based on what other in this case misunderstand. Which means you (because the person you quoted is behind) are 4 or 5 steps behind in the conversation which is why you don't know what is going on.

Yet you self righteously feel like you can speak from a position of valid authority and levy judgements against me and what i have said.

You are the worse kind of hypocrite.. Literally, not just call you empty names. which makes it all the more fun to set you up and swing for the fences like in the last post.

[Excited Penguin]

There are ways to have consensual "forced" sex. It's all about what the couple agrees to beforehand. That's not to say it ever needs to become more than roleplay, or that an actual rape will occur. It requires trust from both parties and an adequate read of what the other person wants, in addition to actual words describing what they want. Then it's all about the fantasy of it.

[KevinM1]

By simple definition, sex that is forced is non-consensual.

This, right here.

[The Grand Nudger]

Unfortunately you can't laugh an attorney out of court.  If he was a lawyer, his clients would pay for his idiocy.  Not him.

[FatAndFaithless]

There are ways to have consensual "forced" sex. It's all about what the couple agrees to beforehand. That's not to say it ever needs to become more than roleplay, or that an actual rape will occur. It requires trust from both parties and an adequate read of what the other person wants, in addition to actual words describing what they want. Then it's all about the fantasy of it.

Forced sex =/= rough sex..

And Drich is not talking about a fetish play that's confirmed beforehand. He's literally talking about forcing sex onto someone without confirmation.

[Catholic_Lady]

There are ways to have consensual "forced" sex. It's all about what the couple agrees to beforehand. That's not to say it ever needs to become more than roleplay, or that an actual rape will occur. It requires trust from both parties and an adequate read of what the other person wants, in addition to actual words describing what they want. Then it's all about the fantasy of it.

Then it's not forced.

[Drich]

I have to say, that's the first time I've ever been called a bigot for thinking that forced sex is rape.

Obviously, you're a bigot. I mean -- Christ, man! -- you think your culture in which women's autonomy is respected (however imperfectly) is superior to cultures in which women are seen as property, people to be forcefully sexually dominated, and/or brood mares. How narrow-minded of you!

No wonder you don't buy into the Bible. I suggest you brush up on your ethical and cultural relativism and then go back to reading the unchanging Eternal Word. Maybe then you'll see the light.

I see you've adopted a culturally diverse attitude.. where only your society has merit or a valid claim on right and wrong.

[The Grand Nudger]

There are ways to have consensual "forced" sex. It's all about what the couple agrees to beforehand. That's not to say it ever needs to become more than roleplay, or that an actual rape will occur. It requires trust from both parties and an adequate read of what the other person wants, in addition to actual words describing what they want. Then it's all about the fantasy of it.

There a ways to have a square circle too.  

All of the things you described refer to consent. No, it's not possible to have consensual forced sex. The air quotes imply, to me, that you understand this. If you don't, I'll tell you to keep your dick in your pants too, for your own good if no one else's.

[Joods]

You are the worse kind of hypocrite.. Literally, not just call you empty names. which makes it all the more fun to set you up and swing for the fences like in the last post.

bold mine.

So then you're admitting to trolling now eh, sport?