How Much Evidence Will It Take You To Believe In God???

[pocaracas]

Well.... I'm a gentleman, so... after you.

Just, me a reason why God does not exist.

Okay, because no god is required. Everything works fine without a god, it seems.

Now you give me a reason why God does exist. (a proper reason, please. Something with some thought thrown into it)

[Mister Agenda]

Lol. You are the one here asking for what evidence would we accept. And it's you that needs to provide it.

Nice shift of the burden of proof. A classic.

 So you admit God can't be disproven, yet you argue from the position that he does not exist? Am I understanding you correctly?

The list of things that are imaginary that cannot be disproven is potentially infinite. You don't get points for the reality of God because he's been placed beyond the bounds of inquiry along with leprechauns and flying invisible unicorns; the existence of which also cannot be disproven.

Most of us argue from the position that God has not been established to exist, and that belief that God does exist is not justified by the available evidence and reasoning posed in favor of that proposition.

[FatAndFaithless]

..Are you serious?  Your summary of the Big Bang Theory is not what the Big Bang Theory says.  You're just flat wrong.

Again, You just said I am wrong, but you haven't said Why I am wrong?

If you are seriously asking for an explanation of the Big Bang Theory because you're too lazy to google it yourself, look at Mister Agenda's response.

[Mister Agenda]

More lying.

You seem to lack both humility and charity. Are there any Christian virtues you DO possess?

[Joods]

Fuck off and go play in traffic. You come to an atheist forum, admitting that your sole intent is to "convert" us, you have the balls to tell others here what they think and/or feel, assert your opinions that your piece of shit god exists, without any shred of proof (which you still have yet to supply) and then have the audacity to demand we provide your proof for you?  You're nothing more than a festering boil on the ass of humanity, who does nothing more than troll and spread ignorance.

No, sweet cheeks, I'm not lying. You are the liar. Show some tangible proof via the scientific method, you know, the kind thats been tested, for the existence of any god.

I'll wait.

More lying.

Seriously? That's the best you can do?

Ok troll. Thank you for cementing, in writing, for everyone here to see, what a cowardly, POS, you are for failing miserably to address a simple question put to you.

Jeebus must be so proud.

[Edward John]

You just I am wrong, but you haven't said Why I am wrong?

Since you are too intellectually lazy and incurious to read a Wikipedia article on the topic: The Big Bang or Initial Expansion describes what happened when the previous state of affairs, a hot, dense, energetic, compressed universe; suddenly started expanding and eventually formed the universe we find ourselves in. The theory doesn't describe why the universe expanded, how long it was in its previous state; whether a moment or an eternity or in-between; but what it does describe is based on astronomical observations and it has been confirmed by finding additional phenomena that the theory predicted we would find if it's true. It's not a theory of ultimate origin. We do not have the physics to describe with certainty what preceded the 'Big Bang'. We have plausible hypotheses, almost too many of them, and as yet no way to confirm which, if any of them, are true. The BBT doesn't try explain what you seem to think it does.

Exactly, my point is the big bang theory fails to give us where all this matter came from? How it exploded and created all this order and laws in the universe? Why it exploded? If the Big Bang is true, then how did it happen?  Would you say that out of nothing came something; that when nothing existed, somehow something came into existence?  Or would you say that the Big Bang has no explanation "yet;" but that, by faith, some scientist in the future will prove how it happened, even though it violates the laws of known physics?

[Minimalist]

Again, You just said I am wrong, but you haven't said Why I am wrong?

You're wrong because you're you and you've never been right.

[Edward John]

More lying.

Seriously? That's the best you can do?

Ok troll. Thank you for cementing, in writing, for everyone here to see, what a cowardly, POS, you are for failing miserably to address a simple question put to you.

Jeebus must be so proud.

Wikipedia Wrote:

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion, often for the troll's amusement.

I am not a troll but here to give a logical and reasonable arguments. You are raising false accusations against me, just as Jesus was falsely accused. Therefore you are lying even further.

[Crossless2.0]

More lying.

You seem to lack both humility and charity. Are there any Christian virtues you DO possess?

Credulity.

[Edward John]

Again, You just said I am wrong, but you haven't said Why I am wrong?

You're wrong because you're you and you've never been right.

Why?