Dinosaur tail found preserved in amber!

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

For reference, here's AiG's response:

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/f...-in-amber/

I'm not a big follower of AIG, but the rest of the article did have some good info as well (if not providing their own tilt to the matter). 

The following seems to take a more conservative approach, in that there is speculation in either case (bird or dinosaur tail).
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2016/12/fea...03354.html

While searching, I also found the following interesting, in some of the speculation over feathered dinosaurs, and where information is extrapolated.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/09/inc...38061.html

I went to the website. Did not read the articles in question, but I clicked on the link 'What Is Intelligent Design?' I got as far as, ' intelligent design is a scientific research program...' Then I threw up on my phone.

Boru

[Anomalocaris]

All I want to know is when are they gonna clone it?

That's the spirit!

A real twitching, thrashing feathered tail would be utterly unique in today's world, but is unlikely to support an entire theme park.

[Faith No More]

Funny how they don't cite the author's name in that AIG article so his credentials can be checked.

But once again, the bible thumpers that openly admit they are bias towards the bible know better than the people with Ph. D's that have spent their lives studying this kind of thing.

[Amarok]

For reference, here's AiG's response:

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/f...-in-amber/

I'm not a big follower of AIG, but the rest of the article did have some good info as well (if not providing their own tilt to the matter). 

The following seems to take a more conservative approach, in that there is speculation in either case (bird or dinosaur tail).
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2016/12/fea...03354.html

While searching, I also found the following interesting, in some of the speculation over feathered dinosaurs, and where information is extrapolated.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/09/inc...38061.html

Creationist crap in science clothing and lame excuse making yawn

[brewer]

I must be hungry. All I can think of is dino tail soup!

[Minimalist]

For reference, here's AiG's response:

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/f...-in-amber/

We conclude that DIP-V-15103 is a bird, and not a 99-million-year-old theropod dinosaur. This is supported by the discovery of 99-million-year-old bird wings including bones and feathers found by Lida Xing et al. in the same type of Burmese amber as DIP-V-15103.3 I reject the age assigned to these fossils, but it shows that small birds, perhaps juveniles, left evidence of their unquestionably bird-like anatomy in Burmese amber. So where is the evolution?

Dumb as a bag of cunt hair.

[chimp3]

For reference, here's AiG's response:

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/f...-in-amber/

We conclude that DIP-V-15103 is a bird, and not a 99-million-year-old theropod dinosaur. This is supported by the discovery of 99-million-year-old bird wings including bones and feathers found by Lida Xing et al. in the same type of Burmese amber as DIP-V-15103.3 I reject the age assigned to these fossils, but it shows that small birds, perhaps juveniles, left evidence of their unquestionably bird-like anatomy in Burmese amber. So where is the evolution?

Right! It is a bird with a tail. That's my favorite part of a chicken. I like the tails. ( Trying to sound sarcastic but that actually sounds suggestive)

[Thumpalumpacus]

For reference, here's AiG's response:

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/f...-in-amber/

We conclude that DIP-V-15103 is a bird, and not a 99-million-year-old theropod dinosaur. This is supported by the discovery of 99-million-year-old bird wings including bones and feathers found by Lida Xing et al. in the same type of Burmese amber as DIP-V-15103.3 I reject the age assigned to these fossils, but it shows that small birds, perhaps juveniles, left evidence of their unquestionably bird-like anatomy in Burmese amber. So where is the evolution?

I'll take "What is Cherry-picking" for a True Daily Double, Alex.

[RoadRunner79]

I'm not a big follower of AIG, but the rest of the article did have some good info as well (if not providing their own tilt to the matter). 

The following seems to take a more conservative approach, in that there is speculation in either case (bird or dinosaur tail).
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2016/12/fea...03354.html

While searching, I also found the following interesting, in some of the speculation over feathered dinosaurs, and where information is extrapolated.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/09/inc...38061.html

I went to the website. Did not read the articles in question, but I clicked on the link 'What Is Intelligent Design?'   I got as far as, ' intelligent design is a scientific research program...'  Then I threw up on my phone.

Boru

Of course.... I wouldn't expect the anti-intelligence crowd to read the article or respond to the points made.   This was posted for others

[Minimalist]

I went to the website. Did not read the articles in question, but I clicked on the link 'What Is Intelligent Design?'   I got as far as, ' intelligent design is a scientific research program...'  Then I threw up on my phone.

Boru

Of course.... I wouldn't expect the anti-intelligence crowd to read the article or respond to the points made.   This was posted for others