Posts: 16397
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
July 28, 2022 at 5:43 pm
(July 28, 2022 at 5:11 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: (July 28, 2022 at 4:44 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: Quran, just like Bible, claims that God created the universe in six days. Earth is created on the first day. Four days later, God creates the sun, moon, and stars.
And why do you consider this to be a mistake? The duration of a day in these verses isn't the one we're familiar with, it could be any arbitrary duration that only God knows, the theist can legitimately argue along these lines.
But there is one thing that doesn't change, even if the durations are disagreed upon: ratios of durations !
With this in mind, some muslim apologists went further and turned the tables, there is a numerical miracle in the verses about creation :
Say: Is it that ye deny Him Who created the earth in two Days? And do ye join equals with Him? He is the Lord of (all) the Worlds. (9)
He set on the (earth), mountains standing firm, high above it, and bestowed blessings on the earth, and measure therein all things to give them nourishment in due proportion, in four Days, in accordance with (the needs of) those who seek (Sustenance). (10)
Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke: He said to it and to the earth: "Come ye together, willingly or unwillingly." They said: "We do come (together), in willing obedience." (11)
So He completed them as seven firmaments in two Days, and He assigned to each heaven its duty and command. (12)
[7-9,10,11,12]
From these verses we learn that :
(1) In the first two days of creation (out of 6): God created the Earth.
(2) In the first four days of creation (which overlap with the first two days above): God bestowed mountains, and various sources of nourishment and blessings.
(3) In the last two days (out of 6): He completed the heavens as seven firmaments.
The two last statements can easily be misunderstood, especially when the verse is not read in Arabic. The statement (1) however is clear and incontrovertible, it can't be interpreted in any other way, the age of the Earth is 2/6 that of the creation as a whole (e.g. the universe), and 2/6 is 1/3.
We now know that the age of the Earth is 4.5 billion years, and that of the universe is is approximately 13.7 billion years, the ratio 4.5/13.7 (=0.328...) is very close to 1/3.
If we take more decimals in the ratio from available data 4.543/13.787 = 0.3295.., we only get closer and closer to 1/3.
Why wouldn't god create the mountains, nourishments, and whatever the heck blessings are on the same day that he created the earth? Seems like god is a poor time manager.
Did (s)he look at the earth and decide it needed lumps?
Posts: 1101
Threads: 15
Joined: November 29, 2019
Reputation:
2
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
July 28, 2022 at 5:44 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2022 at 5:45 pm by R00tKiT.)
(July 28, 2022 at 5:27 pm)Helios Wrote: He never claimed they did this. He was pointing out that no one needed a god to learn this stuff and it's possible he honestly attributed his own understanding to a revelation from god.
You could've said that if there were only one risky claim such as water being present in all organisms. There are dozens of other similar claims.
The probability of getting one risky claim right: 1/2=0.5
two risky claims : 1/4=0.25
four risky claims : 1/16=0.0625.
Let's be generous and say there are only 30 risky statements in the Qur'an (out of a total of 6236 verses): the probability of getting all of them right is 1/2^30 = 9.3132257e-10 = 9.3132257 x 10-10 = 0.00000000093132257.
You're free to believe that the prophet is that lucky, ofc.
Posts: 10994
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
July 28, 2022 at 5:47 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2022 at 6:22 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
There has not been a single claim thus far I have seen that I would regard as "risky" so your numbers don't impress me .....
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 1101
Threads: 15
Joined: November 29, 2019
Reputation:
2
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
July 28, 2022 at 5:48 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2022 at 5:49 pm by R00tKiT.)
(July 28, 2022 at 5:43 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Why wouldn't god create the mountains, nourishments, and whatever the heck blessings are on the same day that he created the earth?
That's a well-known objection: God seems to waste resources/not allocate them optimally (such as time in this case). But I don't have to remind you, there is no need to worry about efficiency or wasting time when you are the creator of time..
If there are scarce resources : we should allocate them intelligently.
If the resource is unlimited : efficiency/resource allocation is meaningless.
And, obviously, God purportedly has unlimited time.
Posts: 10994
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
July 28, 2022 at 5:50 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2022 at 5:52 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Just because you could do something ineffectively doesn't mean you would or that it would make sense that you would .....
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 3413
Threads: 25
Joined: August 9, 2015
Reputation:
27
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
July 28, 2022 at 6:20 pm
Depends op, How seriously do you take the Silmarillion?
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
Conservative trigger warning.
Posts: 67168
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
July 28, 2022 at 7:19 pm
I wonder how allah is going to feel about being called a bumblefuck and a lollygagger by a true muslim.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 16859
Threads: 461
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
July 29, 2022 at 3:16 am
(July 28, 2022 at 5:11 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: (July 28, 2022 at 4:44 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: Quran, just like Bible, claims that God created the universe in six days. Earth is created on the first day. Four days later, God creates the sun, moon, and stars.
And why do you consider this to be a mistake? The duration of a day in these verses isn't the one we're familiar with, it could be any arbitrary duration that only God knows, the theist can legitimately argue along these lines.
Why? Are you kidding me? I ask because I explained it in the second part of that post. What, you failed to read it?
Here, I'll paste it again
Quote:Indeed, using confirmation bias with arrogance, any creation myth can be "true".
Take an ancient Chinese myth which tells us that everything started in chaos. The universe was like a black egg (a black hole?). A god named Pan Gu, wielding an axe, breaks the egg and the heavens begin to expand. The fleas and lice on Pan Gu's body evolve into humankind.
And that is what you are doing with"days can mean millions of years" and similar. Maybe flees are single cells, black egg is a black hole, etc.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Posts: 1101
Threads: 15
Joined: November 29, 2019
Reputation:
2
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
August 7, 2022 at 6:03 pm
(July 29, 2022 at 3:16 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: Indeed, using confirmation bias with arrogance, any creation myth can be "true".
Take an ancient Chinese myth which tells us that everything started in chaos. The universe was like a black egg (a black hole?). A god named Pan Gu, wielding an axe, breaks the egg and the heavens begin to expand. The fleas and lice on Pan Gu's body evolve into humankind.
And that is what you are doing with"days can mean millions of years" and similar. Maybe flees are single cells, black egg is a black hole, etc.
It's not even remotely plausible to refer to a black hole as a black egg.. and modern science doesn't tell us the universe came from a black hole (afaik). It's really unfair of you to compare this silly myth with the Qur'anic verses that I mentioned.
I didn't invent the interpretations of a day in the Qur'an. It's explicitly mentioned in the Qur'an that the word day doesn't refer to the duration we're familiar with :
And, verily, a day with your Lord is as a thousand years of what you reckon [al-Hajj 22:47]
The angels and the Rooh [Jibreel] ascend to Him in a Day the measure whereof is fifty thousand years [al-Maaarij 70:4]
I anticipate a possible misunderstanding of the first verse: it doesn't say that a day of creation is equal to 1000 years, the verse explicitly uses the preposition "as" to make it clear that this is a mere comparison : a day as used in the Qur'an is a very extended period of time, such as 1000 years.
In the second verse the Qur'an explicitly considers the duration of 50000 years to be a single day. This is enough to justify the interpretation of the verses of creation as referring to periods of millions (billions?) of years :
(July 28, 2022 at 5:11 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: The duration of a day in these verses isn't the one we're familiar with, it could be any arbitrary duration that only God knows, the theist can legitimately argue along these lines.
But there is one thing that doesn't change, even if the durations are disagreed upon: ratios of durations !
With this in mind, some muslim apologists went further and turned the tables, there is a numerical miracle in the verses about creation :
Say: Is it that ye deny Him Who created the earth in two Days? And do ye join equals with Him? He is the Lord of (all) the Worlds. (9)
He set on the (earth), mountains standing firm, high above it, and bestowed blessings on the earth, and measure therein all things to give them nourishment in due proportion, in four Days, in accordance with (the needs of) those who seek (Sustenance). (10)
Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke: He said to it and to the earth: "Come ye together, willingly or unwillingly." They said: "We do come (together), in willing obedience." (11)
So He completed them as seven firmaments in two Days, and He assigned to each heaven its duty and command. (12)
[7-9,10,11,12]
From these verses we learn that :
(1) In the first two days of creation (out of 6): God created the Earth.
(2) In the first four days of creation (which overlap with the first two days above): God bestowed mountains, and various sources of nourishment and blessings.
(3) In the last two days (out of 6): He completed the heavens as seven firmaments.
The two last statements can easily be misunderstood, especially when the verse is not read in Arabic. The statement (1) however is clear and incontrovertible, it can't be interpreted in any other way, the age of the Earth is 2/6 that of the creation as a whole (e.g. the universe), and 2/6 is 1/3.
We now know that the age of the Earth is 4.5 billion years, and that of the universe is is approximately 13.7 billion years, the ratio 4.5/13.7 (=0.328...) is very close to 1/3.
If we take more decimals in the ratio from available data 4.543/13.787 = 0.3295.., we only get closer and closer to 1/3.
Posts: 67168
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: How literally should we take the Qur'an ?
August 7, 2022 at 6:28 pm
Numerology.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
|