Posts: 13900
Threads: 262
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Michael "Intelligent Design" Behe's son is an Atheist
October 10, 2010 at 5:38 am
[quote='solja247' pid='98298' dateline='1286587292']
[quote]
I have to admit, I feel sorry for Dawkins, he verses these theists who completely dominate him, because he isnt a philosopher. He spends quite a bit of time looking like a stunned mullet! Poor guy.
Anyways, I dont know, I will ask him one day, when I tell him that he has made me a better Theist, a rational theist.
[/quote]
I have watched many debates between Dawkins and theists and you my friend are talking out of your backside.
The reason he dominates so easily is that he is better than a philosipher he is a scientist and scientists deal with evidence, philosophers use thought and "logic", and these can lead us down blind alleys, sometimes for thousands of years.
I'm thinking of the medicine here, where the balance of the bodies humurs was the key to health. Which led to the bleeding of already weakened people and other such crap and often fatal treatments.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humorism
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 398
Threads: 14
Joined: August 6, 2010
Reputation:
2
RE: Michael "Intelligent Design" Behe's son is an Atheist
October 10, 2010 at 8:32 am
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2010 at 8:36 am by solja247.)
Quote:Deeper than a delusion? Then its just plain insanity, right?
Perhaps, but perhaps Im right and your wrong. I guess we will find out one day...
Quote:So, I understand you proved the existence of god using "philosophy". Where did you first cross paths with this "philosophy"?
I dont know what you mean?
Quote:Would a delusion delude anyone if it didn't appear to someone to be deeper than a mere delusion?
It is easy to dismiss a delustion with critical thinking, that is why I said it has to be deeper than a dellusion...
Quote:The reason he dominates so easily is that he is better than a philosipher he is a scientist and scientists deal with evidence, philosophers use thought and "logic", and these can lead us down blind alleys, sometimes for thousands of years.
There is a saying that scienctists are the worst philosophers...
Dawkins is not a philosophy (which is obvious) I do feel sorry for him when he goes against some of the greatest philosophers of this age (William Lane Craig)
This is a review of the 'God Dellusion' by Dawkins, reviewed by John Cottingham, a famous philosopher
http://www.rationalvedanta.net/node/100
Warning: This may upset Dawkins followers
Its ok to have doubt, just dont let that doubt become the answers.
You dont hate God, you hate the church game.
"God is not what you imagine or what you think you understand. If you understand you have failed." Saint Augustine
Your mind works very simply: you are either trying to find out what are God's laws in order to follow them; or you are trying to outsmart Him. -Martin H. Fischer
Posts: 13900
Threads: 262
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Michael "Intelligent Design" Behe's son is an Atheist
October 10, 2010 at 9:39 am
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2010 at 9:45 am by downbeatplumb.)
(October 10, 2010 at 8:32 am)solja247 Wrote: Quote:Deeper than a delusion? Then its just plain insanity, right?
Perhaps, but perhaps Im right and your wrong. I guess we will find out one day...
Quote:So, I understand you proved the existence of god using "philosophy". Where did you first cross paths with this "philosophy"?
I dont know what you mean?
Quote:Would a delusion delude anyone if it didn't appear to someone to be deeper than a mere delusion?
It is easy to dismiss a delustion with critical thinking, that is why I said it has to be deeper than a dellusion...
Quote:The reason he dominates so easily is that he is better than a philosipher he is a scientist and scientists deal with evidence, philosophers use thought and "logic", and these can lead us down blind alleys, sometimes for thousands of years.
There is a saying that scienctists are the worst philosophers...
Dawkins is not a philosophy (which is obvious) I do feel sorry for him when he goes against some of the greatest philosophers of this age (William Lane Craig)
This is a review of the 'God Dellusion' by Dawkins, reviewed by John Cottingham, a famous philosopher
http://www.rationalvedanta.net/node/100
Warning: This may upset Dawkins followers
So youre just going to repeat that he doesnt win the debates when he obviously does. In every debate I've seen him in, he answers every question in a reasoned and honest fashion and has on every occasion demolished completely the counter arguments, exposing them for the bullshit they are.
Dont get me wrong I'm not a Dawkins fan boy, but dont pretend he loses coz he wins every time.
I read the review and couldnt find the bits to get upset over, he didnt enjoy the god delusion and found the writing confrontational, well whoop de fucking do.
He did not effectively refute any of dawkins points. Not one theist has.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 11742
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: Michael "Intelligent Design" Behe's son is an Atheist
October 10, 2010 at 11:07 am
(October 7, 2010 at 5:42 pm)theVOID Wrote: The worst part is how he's treading him for his atheism, refusing to let him speak to his brothers, moving him into the basement, not speaking to him etc.
What a prick.
And they say atheists are intolerant!
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Michael "Intelligent Design" Behe's son is an Atheist
October 10, 2010 at 1:54 pm
(October 10, 2010 at 8:32 am)solja247 Wrote: [...]when he goes against some of the greatest philosophers of this age (William Lane Craig)
|
