More stupid from Sessions: "gay people aren't protected from discrimination

[Kitan Etos]

[Chad32]

If not, then that's a problem that should definitely be addressed. Though given that the SC legalized gay marriage a year or two ago, then their rights are being protected by something.

[Kitan Etos]

If not, then that's a problem that should definitely be addressed. Though given that the SC legalized gay marriage a year or two ago, then their rights are being protected by something.

Not to mention the fact that every place of employment where I have worked here in Florida has a legal mention in its handbook that discrimination against one's sexual preference is wrong.

[Jackie]

[Chad32]

It is a pity that we have to have the same fight over every single individual group like this. Blacks, immigrants, women, LGBT, interracial couples, atheists, and whatever other group people can think of.

[Kitan Etos]

It is a pity that we have to have the same fight over every single individual group like this. Blacks, immigrants, women, LGBT, interracial couples, atheists, and whatever other group people can think of.

'Murica is lagging behind while the rest of the world is advancing socially.

It used to be a worldwide problem, but now shifts are occurring where 'Murica seems to want to regress rather than evolve.

It is very sad.

[Seraphina]

He probably thinks blacks, women, Jews, you name it, "aren't protected from discrimination" either.

-Teresa

[Minimalist]

If not, then that's a problem that should definitely be addressed. Though given that the SC legalized gay marriage a year or two ago, then their rights are being protected by something.

Sadly he is right.  There is no federal statute on sexual orientation.  The SC has upheld or struck down state laws in certain cases and in the gay marriage case struck down the section of the Defense of Marriage Act for violations of the 14th Amendment.  The conservatards on the court dissented vigorously... as one would expect from those tards.

[brewer]

[Minimalist]