Space Directive Un, Part Duex...no trois..no....

[Abaddon_ire]

Nope, it is not easy at all. The infrastructure to build a Saturn V does not exist today. If you think it does, feel free to point it right out. It took close to half a million people to get Apollo of the ground, Start your recruiting drive now. Do you really hold the delusion that such enormous projects happen on a whim?

And yes. The blueprints do exist. Why you would advocate 1960's technology for a return to the moon is beyond weird.

Well, according to you the 1960s technology was good enough to make severe trips to the moon so why do you need to invent a whole new infrastructure for a return in 2019?  Get it done!  Hell, have the Chinese or the North Koreans build the damn thing.    Or was the whole project just a scam?

Because it simply was broken up/decommissioned after the Apollo programme finished. Why is that difficult to understand?

---

What part of, we don't need 1960s technology, do you not understand? And again I'll ask you, if you think the Apollo project was a scam then tell me why you believe so. Did we land on the moon, yes or no?

They were faked.  http://listverse.com/2012/12/28/10-reaso...be-a-hoax/

We'll see if the Chinese make it there and back.

From your list...
10. The Waving Flag. The flag never waves.

9. Lack of Impact Crater. The LM did not impact the moon. 

8. Multiple Light Sources. No evidence. If there were multiple light sources, there would be multiple shadows. There are never multiple shadows.

7. The Van Allen Radiation Belt. You mean the belt that the Apollo missions deliberately DID NOT PASS THROUGH.

6. The Unexplained Object. The one that has been explained ad nauseum.

5. Slow-Motion Walking and Hidden Cables. Debunked nonsense. Speed up the footage, all of the footage and you will see how absurd that claim is. The "wires" turn out to be several different things all of which can be demonstrated to NOT be wires at all.

4. Lack of Stars. One of the dumbest claims ever made. Apollo was on the moon during the daytime. The cameras were set for daytime exposures. The couldn't have picked up stars, it would actually be evidence of fakery if there were stars in the pictures.

3. The “C” Rock. Proven to be a random fibre on the scanner used to convert the actual photos into digital format.

2. The Layered Cross-hairs. That is a well known process known as "bleed".

1. The Duplicate Backdrop. A) it isn't duplicated and B) it's a honking great mountain in the distance. Does moving a few hundred meters in any direction change the appearance of your local distant mountains? Of course not. So why would it on the moon?

So you strange belief in fakery is fundamentally based on lies.

[Anomalocaris]

Given that the fundamental technologies behind space access and space travel really haven’t advanced very much between 1969 and now, it is odd he seem to believe the Chinese can do it now, but the Americans could not do it in 1969.

What do you think the Chinese can do now that the Americans could not do in 1969 that would have made a fundamental difference to the ability to land a man on the moon?

[AFTT47]

Arguing with one of these Apollo conspiracy nuts is the same as arguing with a creationist or flat-earther - an utter waste of time. On top of that, WOG is also a Trump supporter. We're not dealing with someone with a full deck here. Probably best to let sleeping dogs lay.

[Wyrd of Gawd]

Are we there yet?

[Abaddon_ire]

Are we there yet?

Are we where yet?

Can we conclude that you moon hoax claims are comprehensively nutty? Yes.