Why does science always upstage God?

[The Grand Nudger]

No one finds this convincing.  Is there anything else?

Maybe if you drank a big pot of coffee it may register with you that you and your side can't be convinced because you're spoiled brats who ignore science and hate being proved wrong. You'll all do whatever takes to believe your absurdities.

That didn't make it any more convincing.  Nothing else?

[Billy Bob]

So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

Shame you can't give any reason why it needs to be supernatural.  Oh well.  Maybe in your next life.  

It is best to admit you have a reading and thinking problem, this way you can seek help. Your brain really is messed up. Show the correct doctor your replies and they will CLEARLY see what your issue is. Show them what you IGNORED>>>

----So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

[Angrboda]

Shame you can't give any reason why it needs to be supernatural.  Oh well.  Maybe in your next life.  

It is best to admit you have a reading and thinking problem, this way you can seek help. Your brain really is messed up. Show the correct doctor your replies and they will CLEARLY see what your issue is. Show them what you IGNORED>>>

----So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

[arewethereyet]

Shame you can't give any reason why it needs to be supernatural.  Oh well.  Maybe in your next life.  

It is best to admit you have a reading and thinking problem, this way you can seek help. Your brain really is messed up. Show the correct doctor your replies and they will CLEARLY see what your issue is. Show them what you IGNORED>>>

----So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

Enough freebies for you...read our rules.  Especially the one on flaming and if you don't know what that is you can Google it.

The other one is that you cannot attempt to limit participation in a thread.

This is friendly advice.  Do it again and it won't be so friendly.

[Fake Messiah]

Wow, you sure live in fear and afraid to back up what you put. 

Get your tail out from between your legs and deal with what you gave, you coward. Oh, you are like everyone else though, you can say and put whatever you want and sure as you're asked to back it up....you show what jokes you really are. Now, now, time to show again what little you actually know. Come on, tiny brain, step up to the plate. 

And again, he avoids the answer. Why won't you simply answer if you accept flat Earth cosmology from the Bible?

[Astreja]

This "Billy-Bob" chap has a style strangely reminiscent of a chap named "Johnny" who got his undies in a twist when the admins over at ExChristian.net recently put all his comments in moderation due to uncouth behaviour. Expect a lot of accusations of lying, and a shitload of demands for us to provide him with scientific evidence.

[pocaracas]

"True, that's why astrophysics posits that the total energy of the Universe is ZERO!"

So where does it add up to zero? Zero in this context is nothing. Nothing as in NO thing, no matter, space, and time. Give me the science that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. Show me your zero has no space, matter, and time. Oh, that would be impossible. You believe in the impossible. You believe in making up whatever you want. Your ASS-trophysics also claim that about 68% of the universe is dark energy, it's NEVER been found. They HAD to make that up to 'answer' for their insanity. Sure, they provide more laughs with dark matter making up about 27%. 

So, do show how there was no space, matter, and time and that it did something when there was nothing to do something. Actually try thinking before you right such absurdity. 

Go on, it's YOUR position so back it up. I'm calling your bluff so show your hand. 

Interesting that you reply to everyone else phrase by phrase, but here... you could only reply to the first one.
Maybe you're the one lying and being disingenuous who can't follow a simple link and check things, instead resorting to childish insults.

Here, have fun with this definition for Dark Energy straight out of Google's first hit:
"
Dark Energy is a hypothetical form of energy that exerts a negative, repulsive pressure, behaving like the opposite of gravity. It has been hypothesised to account for the observational properties of distant type Ia supernovae, which show the universe going through an accelerated period of expansion.
"
Notice that it is explaining something that is happening a bit far away.


Ah, 'murrica's educational system... what a wonder of people you keep producing.
To all those who manage to do well in spite of that system, I salute you

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Shame you can't give any reason why it needs to be supernatural.  Oh well.  Maybe in your next life.  

It is best to admit you have a reading and thinking problem, this way you can seek help. Your brain really is messed up. Show the correct doctor your replies and they will CLEARLY see what your issue is. Show them what you IGNORED>>>

----So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

Who hurt you so badly?

Boru

[Aegon]

Shame you can't give any reason why it needs to be supernatural.  Oh well.  Maybe in your next life.  

It is best to admit you have a reading and thinking problem, this way you can seek help. Your brain really is messed up. Show the correct doctor your replies and they will CLEARLY see what your issue is. Show them what you IGNORED>>>

----So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

Lmao dude are you okay? Do you need someone to talk to?

[The Architect Of Fate]

Wow, you guys really broke this one.