Refuting trinity.

[Angrboda]

Got any arguments for how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? I haven't seen enough of those.

[Edwardo Piet]

I always find it amusing when someone from a stupid religion attempts to disprove another stupid religion.

I find it amusing how you guys think nothing can be proven.

I think a lot of things can be proven. Anything that starts with a premise so sound that it's a tautology, and follows with valid logic from thereon, to reach a sound conclusion... basically....

That doesn't tend to happen with "magic dude exists but only my magic dude and not the other magic dude", somehow that doesn't seem tautologically true to me

---

If God exists, being the most valued thing, it would be the thing worth most discussing.

That's a pretty big if you know.

[Fireball]

Purple.

You guys better get right by the Invisible Pink Unicorn and bless her holy GOLDEN hooves, or suffer an eternity of playing leap frog with said unicorn.

[robvalue]

God can be, to each, theist, whatever they want it to be. It doesn't have to make sense to anyone else or be consistent. It's in its own special environment, where it can morph into whatever the theist wants (or needs) it to be.

You've as little chance of slaying someone else's God as we have of destroying yours. There's only one person who can kill each God.

[Edwardo Piet]

It's always especially hilarious when one religion tries to disprove another...... because it's like a bunch of bullies beating on each other when they're all as bad as each other, while the smart nerdy kid watches them in bemusement

[Drich]

Aspects are different that what they are attributed to.
As such, God cannot have aspects.

To prove this is quite simple. 

God cannot lack a perfection. And whatever perfection he has must be ultimate. But Ultimate by definition can only be God's Sheer self, ultimate life, as such his perfections are in reality not him, but ways we relate to his one sheer perfect reality, that has no divisions or aspects. For example suppose he had a hand like Wahabis say,  then the hand would be not God, and hence not divine, and God would have non-divine attribute, or he would have an equal, and his hand would be just as ultimate as him, which would make him no so ultimate. Both are absurd. Hence, if God exists, he is One.

His attributes we know of him are different than what he is.  They are brought down angles that we relate to him by but the point to in all that, in whatever aspect we call him by,  is sheer ultimate oneness.

And because the independent by which all depends is God, he cannot beget himself, lest the dependent and himself be equal. And another proof, is if he can eternally beget, he would not have created us, but only beget sons, as that would be the right thing to do from love's perspective.

Glob...

What if "perfection" is not a universal standard apart from God?

what if perfection simply describes whatever God is?

If God had to 'work to be perfect or had to mind what He did to retain that title then the idea of perfection supersedes what God is. Therefore the idea of perfection can only describe what God is despite how you may personally define it.

[The Grand Nudger]

I suppose that being perfectly ignorant is a kind of perfection....that might explain god and some other things as well......particularly if being perfectly ignorant is just what god -is-.

[Drich]

I suppose that being perfectly ignorant is a kind of perfection....that might explain god and some other things as well......particularly if being perfectly ignorant is just what god -is-.  

says the guy judging other's and their use of slaves, but at the same time is oblivious of his own use of modern slaves..

[The Grand Nudger]

I also leave the toilet seat up and drink milk from the jug..but none of the terrible things I do will make the god in magic book less of a cunt...so....?

[Minimalist]

Purple.

Heretic!