Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2024, 10:15 am
Thread Rating:
|
Make MAGA pay for the Wall Street
|
It certainly feels just like the great depression. I just hope all those old-timers are dead, as nobody should have to face these hardships twice in their lives.
Putting aside the alarmist pile of bullshit you can't spoon into your mouth fast enough... If you address problems in corporate globalist greed, the stock market will take a hit. Again, this should be something you support Trump on. Or are you an Amazon fan now, and against anything that hurts their stock price?  (April 3, 2018 at 9:20 am)wallym Wrote: It certainly feels just like the great depression. I just hope all those old-timers are dead, as nobody should have to face these hardships twice in their lives. It is is a huge problem for workers WORLDWIDE that 62 billionaire individuals and families have the combined GLOBAL income of 3 billion others. Greed is a problem, now you show me where the I have ever said it is possible to end global trade. Breaking up monopolies does not mean anti private sector. Nope sorry, if your argument is "let the rich do what they want to everyone else" and if you think "trickle down" really works, you are ignorant of economic history. Right now at this point I'll be a fan of anyone who knocks the orange fuckface off his narcissistic perch.
So Trump says Amazon should pay more. This has cost the richest man in the world 16 billion dollars in fears that future policies would cut into Amazon's profits by taking away loopholes. Isn't this what you want?
A side effect of this, is the stock market dipping. But the 62 billionaires own most of the stock market. So to spread their wealth, the stock market has to dip. Do you see how it's weird you're painting the stock market dipping as a negative in your OP. Then complaining about billionaires in your 2nd post? Being anti-trump has pitted you against yourself. 
Chicken Little.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
(April 3, 2018 at 9:52 am)wallym Wrote: So Trump says Amazon should pay more. This has cost the richest man in the world 16 billion dollars in fears that future policies would cut into Amazon's profits by taking away loopholes. Isn't this what you want? Please spare me. 45 could give one fuck less if Amazon fucks people over. The only reason he is picking a fight with the CEO is because the CEO doesn't like him. For the same reason 45 decided to run, was because Obama poked fun of him at the Press conference dinner. 45 is a narcissistic jackass. No asshole, just the opposite. THE GOP has conned their supporters in voting against their own self interests. 45 himself, long before he ran, has had a business history of fucking over his contractors and investors. If you really think he cares you are a fool. You're not going to get away with the bullshit claim that 45 OR the GOP want the rich to pay more. This is the same bullshit con he pulled on Carrier workers. This is merely him pretending to give a fuck. 
Post Office has contradicted the claim they lose money delivering Amazon parcels.
It was my impression First Class Mail was the big money loser and the collectibles and parcels were profitable. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
(April 3, 2018 at 10:16 am)vorlon13 Wrote: Post Office has contradicted the claim they lose money delivering Amazon parcels. If you can charge 2 dollars for a service, and charge 1 dollar instead, you'd be losing a fortune, even if you're making a profit. It's like the best baseball player in the world signing a contract for $25,000 dollars a year. They'd be profiting $25,000. But they lost a ton of money signing the deal, because they could have gotten $25,000,000 a year. The key principle is that the value of that 1 dollar exists. And Amazon, the giant company that prints money is getting it, and the Postal Service which loses tons of money doesn't. Don't let the semantics distract from the more important point. (April 3, 2018 at 10:36 am)wallym Wrote:(April 3, 2018 at 10:16 am)vorlon13 Wrote: Post Office has contradicted the claim they lose money delivering Amazon parcels. No no no no, if you are going to claim 45 is making this argument, even if I agreed with you, which I don't, it is still FUCKING LIP SERVICE. We've done deregulation, union busting and "don't tax the rich" since Reagan, now, which party does the Orange fuckface belong to? If you want a Republican who actually cared, Teddy would have fit that bill. 45 only gives a shit about himself, nobody else. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
