Mass Shooting In Toronto (updated )

[Minimalist]

Easy as pie.

[Shell B]

Wow. A person has to be REALLY fucked up to shoot Canadians.

Boru

You know, I have Canadian relatives and one Canadian acquaintance. I don't understand the stereotype. They're all assholes. One of them is a bible-thumper with a hair across her ass.

On a more important note, that sucks. I hope everyone who survived recovers.

[CapnAwesome]

Easy as pie.

Sample size of 8 that excludes Russia for no reason. Useless graph.

Edit: actually the graph is worse than that, since it pretends to be just homocides , which is what the large print says, but in tiny print on the side says 'gun homocides'

Intentionally misleading propaganda.

[downbeatplumb]

Easy as pie.

Sample size of 8 that excludes Russia for no reason. Useless graph.

Edit: actually the graph is worse than that, since it pretends to be just homocides , which is what the large print says, but in tiny print on the side says 'gun homocides'

Intentionally misleading propaganda.

Are you saying that guns don't make it easier to kill people?

The reason it misses out Russia is that it has no-data. Presumably Russia aren't very forth coming on that.

[Amarok]

Funny thing is thought it's TO's location near America that makes it so large and prosperous.

All of Canada lives close to the US. Huddled up for warmth.

Actually more for trade

---

Why won't they? If no one is allowed to own a gun, what will they shoot people with?

A large truck, apparently.

Which still isn't as good as a gun

---

Easy as pie.

Sample size of 8 that excludes Russia for no reason. Useless graph.

Edit: actually the graph is worse than that, since it pretends to be just homocides , which is what the large print says, but in tiny print on the side says 'gun homocides'

Intentionally misleading propaganda.

1.Excluding Russia should be relevant why ? Do you imagine huge amounts of gun violence there?

2.How does that make it worse 

3. You short on a case here

[CapnAwesome]

Sample size of 8 that excludes Russia for no reason. Useless graph.

Edit: actually the graph is worse than that, since it pretends to be just homocides , which is what the large print says, but in tiny print on the side says 'gun homocides'

Intentionally misleading propaganda.

Are you saying that guns don't make it easier to kill people?

The reason it misses out Russia is that it has no-data. Presumably Russia aren't very forth coming on that.

How would you conclude that I was saying guns don't mke it easier to kill people off of that? What I'm saying is exactly what I said, that chart is useless propghanda trying to make one stat look like another one.

Are you saying that it's not doing that?

---

All of Canada lives close to the US. Huddled up for warmth.

Actually more for trade

---

A large truck, apparently.

Which still isn't as good as a gun

---

Sample size of 8 that excludes Russia for no reason. Useless graph.

Edit: actually the graph is worse than that, since it pretends to be just homocides , which is what the large print says, but in tiny print on the side says 'gun homocides'

Intentionally misleading propaganda.

1.Excluding Russia should be relevant why ? Do you imagine huge amounts of gun violence there?

2.How does that make it worse 

3. You short on a case here

Russia has three times the US murder rate. But my point is that it's an intentionally misleading chart. Trying to confuse the gun violence stat with the homocide one. Which is the only relevant stat with f you are trying to make the case that control will lead to less homocides.

Which is the argument that I'm interested in. Unfortunately nobody seems to be even interested in that discussion, and instead just post a bunch of propaganda like that stupid chart.

---

Wow. A person has to be REALLY fucked up to shoot Canadians.

Boru

You know, I have Canadian relatives and one Canadian acquaintance. I don't understand the stereotype. They're all assholes. One of them is a bible-thumper with a hair across her ass.

On a more important note, that sucks. I hope everyone who survived recovers.

Two people in s not much of an accurate survey size. I've slept with more Canadians than that.

[Amarok]

As i said i don't think we should make this into a gun debate thread

[CapnAwesome]

As i said i don't think we should make this into a gun debate thread

Isn't every mass shooting thread turned into one? I'm not big into that debate myself, mostly for the reasons I said. It's always propaganda (on both sides) and never an honest debate. I just felt the need to reply to the chart, which was particularly dishonest.

[RoadRunner79]

As i said i don't think we should make this into a gun debate thread

Why not this one?  It seems like any other one is.

[Amarok]

As i said i don't think we should make this into a gun debate thread

Why not this one?  It seems like any other one is.

Simple that's the reason

---

As i said i don't think we should make this into a gun debate thread

Isn't every mass shooting thread turned into one? I'm not big into that debate myself, mostly for the reasons I said. It's always propaganda (on both sides) and never an honest debate. I just felt the need to reply to the chart, which was particularly dishonest.

Just because it tends to does not mean it needs to