Posts: 29628
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 12:36 pm
(August 13, 2018 at 12:09 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (August 8, 2018 at 11:30 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Pro-life logic: All humans are potentially dead, therefore there's no difference between being alive and being dead. So killing people is fine.
Uh, what?
Neo in particular, and pro-lifers in general like to make the claim that a fetus is a potential human being just like a born child is and ignore the very real differences that exist between both a fetus and a newborn, as well as the respective rights of each, effectively claiming that a potential X is and should be treated the same as an actual X. So I was parodying that logic by showing the result when applied to life and death. It's called a reductio ad absurdum argument. If the logic one is employing leads to an absurd result, then the logic is flawed. Thus Neo and pro-lifers who argue in this way are not making a valid argument.
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 12:57 pm
A human fetus is human. No "potential" necessary.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 1:06 pm
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2018 at 1:07 pm by Amarok.)
Quote:A human fetus is human. No "potential" necessary.
Nope only "potential" Jorm is right .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 8231
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 1:06 pm
(August 13, 2018 at 12:57 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: A human fetus is human. No "potential" necessary.
So are toenail clippings, warts and cancerous growths.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 1:27 pm
Human, but not a human.
Posts: 29628
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 1:37 pm
(August 13, 2018 at 12:57 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: A human fetus is human. No "potential" necessary.
That's nothing more than a semantic argument, and doesn't address the substance of the argument. Try actually addressing the argument rather than the expression of it.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 1:39 pm
(August 13, 2018 at 12:57 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: A human fetus is human. No "potential" necessary.
You have no concern at all that you are over ruling the Lord God Almighty on this subject ??
Genesis 2:7 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (NRSVCE)
7 then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground,[a] and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 3:35 pm
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2018 at 3:37 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(August 13, 2018 at 1:37 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: (August 13, 2018 at 12:57 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: A human fetus is human. No "potential" necessary.
That's nothing more than a semantic argument, and doesn't address the substance of the argument. Try actually addressing the argument rather than the expression of it.
What? My point was that my argument isn't that a human fetus is a "potential human" in the first place. That was a strawman you created. (I don't even know what that means, honestly. Either a particular organism is a human, or it isn't.)
My argument is that a human fetus IS a human being, just as much as a human infant, human toddler, human child, human teenager, human adult, etc... and so as a human, he/she has the same right to life as a human being in all other stages of life. That is my argument.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 3709
Threads: 18
Joined: September 29, 2015
Reputation:
10
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 3:42 pm
(August 13, 2018 at 1:39 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: (August 13, 2018 at 12:57 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: A human fetus is human. No "potential" necessary.
You have no concern at all that you are over ruling the Lord God Almighty on this subject ??
Genesis 2:7 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (NRSVCE)
7 then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground,[a] and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being.
I don't think that this conflicts in the way that you think (or says what you think it says)! However, I believe that an unborn baby is alive and that abortion is killing something. Don't you? I wouldn't have thought that this would controversial.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: After birth abortion?
August 13, 2018 at 3:59 pm
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2018 at 3:59 pm by Amarok.)
Quote:What? My point was that my argument isn't that a human fetus is a "potential human" in the first place. That was a strawman you created. (I don't even know what that means, honestly. Either a particular organism is a human, or it isn't.)
My argument is that a human fetus IS a human being, just as much as a human infant, human toddler, human child, human teenager, human adult, etc... and so as a human, he/she has the same right to life as a human being in all other stages of life. That is my argument.
Nope Jorms right again it's semantics
Quote:I don't think that this conflicts in the way that you think (or says what you think it says)! However, I believe that an unborn baby is alive and that abortion is killing something. Don't you? I wouldn't have thought that this would controversial.
Tell that to your god
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
