C'mon, Look At All This Stuff That's Real

[Mister Agenda]

You can't retract a lie without admitting it was a lie, so don't hold your breath.

[Drich]

maybe it is you who does not understand as you are responding literally 1/2 through the discussion.

I said I clearly understand she does not have to answer anything I said which is why I applaud her for doing a victory dance for apparently defeating me in verbal kombat when she did even both answering a post I wrote to her directly... More specifically doing a dance because of someone else's effort all together ignoring what was addressed to her specifically (sound familiar sport?)

Do you understand now? probably not, so allow me to explain so you don't twist things in your mind and hurt yourself.

Jorgie had a big long post directed at her specifically. again to which no one has to answer anything I say to them but, if said person ceases the opportunity to do a victory dance on someone else's 'win'.. It makes them look intellectually weak or at the very least very lazy. why? because clearly they can not find enough conflict in what I directed at them, to mount a defense or counter point. or they simply don't want to.. because clearly they want to see me fail other wise why the victory lap when they never even ran the race given their own specific opportunity???

Kinda like you who as far as I know have never met. yet you feel like you won something strong enough to belittle my character when your only effort was to copy and paste the works of others and add you own BS commentary.. get over yourself we do not need another bill marr. try original thought. try and speak topically, try and pick up a thread and see if you can openly defend you pov, and if you can THEN do a victory lap, other wise you look like a johnny come lately looser piling on someone else's work!

I notice you didn't bother to retract the lie you posted about me promising to reply Tuesday.  You're confirmation bias on steroids, you count the hits and simply ignore the misses.  And now noting that you think I didn't point out your errors in simple reading comprehension and logic not once, but three times regarding your posts on global cooling simply shows that you are massively deluded.  I'm not going to waste my time reposting that shit because you'd still pretend that the facts are otherwise than they are.  I have already refuted those things multiple times, so you're simply fucked in the head.  

As to the above, you continue to lie in claiming that I took any kind of victory lap.  And your psychoanalysis of me simply shows that you know about as much about human nature as anything else, which is basically nothing.  I clearly indicated that I was very busy and so might not get to replying to your post.  That you think that shows that I cannot find enough conflict in what you directed at me, whatever that means, and that this shows that I'm intellectually weak is one of the more pathetic examples of bad reasoning I've seen lately.  You're slipping further down the ladder of my priorities.  You continue to lie, demonstrate that you're clearly too deluded and stupid to reason with, and engage in unjustified slurs against me.  

You are an example to everyone here.  A bad one.  I pity anyone who looks to you for answers.  

As to what I look like to others, you know as well as I do that your rebuttals and such do nothing to undermine the reputation I have, and simply undermine yours.  So enjoy thinking otherwise, because that's just more delusional thinking on your part.  The only person here who takes you seriously is you, for obvious reasons.  That you think anybody else is doing anything other than looking on in shock and amazement, and laughing, just shows how out of touch with reality you are.

Lord help me..

Look retard, I KNOW WHAT YOU SAID I KNOW YOU MIGHT HAVE BEEN BUSY !!! THAT WAS MY POINT My WHOLE POINT WAS TO CONVEY THAT YOU WERE SOOOOOOOOOO BUSY YOU COULD NOT FULLY RESPOND TO WHAT i WROTE YOU DIRECTLY, BUT YOU WERE NOT BUSY ENOUGH TO MAKE A SNARKY COMMENT AND TAKE A VICTORY LAP ON THE SIDE!!!

here is the part that makes insecure and look stupid.

I observed an action by you and choose a loose term like "victory lap," to lightly describe a liberty taken, not offered to you. What's more, I have not defined said term, nor what aspect of the term I was using to describe your efforts. YET you took my term and assigning value that does not apply to you or what I observed, and then move to call me out? You violated base webicate and you make it my fault? Then call me names and make like I'm stupid?? 

That is the dumbest most insecure f-ing thing I've seen any of you ever do. Are you such a fragile spirit that at the hint of any base criticism you like a sea cucumber evacuate your guts/everything on your insides and project them on to me? That is the only thing that makes sense here as you have come up with some wild out of the blue insults, that don't really apply to me in any way shape or form.. but now that you bring them back to my attention, I can see how they would apply to you.

Are you so insecure that you mistook a minor ribbing and have blown it so far out of proportion that you must turn this teaser joke into a hill now you must be ready to die on???  why are you digging in here? what is wrong with you? are you crazy or just broken? I let this go with you 3 times and even used a peer to beat on/rather than you to explain myself and my actions because clearly you have this so wrong, you look crazy!

I have extended more than one olive branch here, clam the f down and take one. stop assuming the worst in everyone all the time. 3/4 of the time when you try and describe me or what I am doing or thinking you are almost talking about someone else. seriously it's like you are superimposing someone else onto me as 1/2 the time I have no idea where you get whatever it is you are on about. If you are going to try and use me as a whipping boy for someone you hate irl then do a better job and use my flaws rather than the crap you have been bring to the table.

Good lord, I made a joke turn my cheek 3 times hoping you will let this go, but you seem more determined to make this a life and death level discussion on a tongue and cheek comment.

---

You can't retract a lie without admitting it was a lie, so don't hold your breath.

what are you talking about? I made a mistake and owned up to it. 95% of everything I talk about is my own research 5% of the time or maybe less I use good messages I hear from others. most of the time I can retain enough to make thing like this mine...

How ever this is where my dyslexia comes in and when words begin the same like antipas antipater and archelieus  they literally look the same to me. right now I had to write them down on paper and check them off to make sure I got all three.

the message it self is sound in the luke 1:5 does not have to be herod the great that HtG oldest son was also king of judea for a short time/the time Jesus was a baby depending on which time line you subscribe to. That is a truth I posted back in post 42 even if it was ignored and I got confused, and went back to antipas. not to mention I started with the archelaus in the OP thread "Mary's ten year Pregnancy" I state this on page one. then even boru goes into greater detail in post 13... YES! one of you has heard the argument I was also making. 

There is no lie here sport unless you are calling your a liar as well!

[Angrboda]

Yeah, I can see how attributing non-existent motives to me and claiming I said things I didn't say is "turning the other cheek." Go on, Drich. Pull the other one. I'm sorry, but no bells on this one.

Do you really think that a short snarky comment takes as much time as a serious response does? You must be the only one I know that is capable of making that mistake and then going on ad nauseum, changing his story multiple times, in order to defend his mistake. I prioritize things the way I prioritize them which you know nothing about. For you to claim that I should have responded to you because I had no legitimate reason for not doing so is just you once again claiming to know things you can't possibly know. And I will continue to make scattershot snarky comments because they seem apropos to your version of absurdist theater, and longer replies to you seem to merit my attention less and less. If you don't like that, tough shit.

Jesus Bloody Motherfucking Christ, is your ego really that big? I guess so.

[Drich]

Yeah, I can see how attributing non-existent motives to me and claiming I said things I didn't say is "turning the other cheek."  Go on, Drich.  Pull the other one.  I'm sorry, but no bells on this one.

  Are you intentionally being obstinate?

You brought this "you have a response you have yet to address" at least three times asking for a point of reference/looking for a fight. I walked away at least 3 different times (turned the cheek) I did not respond in any way shape or form to you trying to bait me into blowing up a little comment into anything bigger.

It wasn't till one of your supporters decided to parrot back some of your concerns did I take the opportunity to not only explain my self but do it in such a way as to mimic the very act I was blasting you about. (taking a victory lap on the work or words of someone else/pretending I had won the upper hand) just to see if it would resonate.. Seems to me you demand of me (a response) when none is obligated. Or should I take your 3+ inquiries as an obligation you place on me to answer each and every pick a fight post you place, while you reserve the right to not respond to a day's work on my behalf? 

I'm not begging for a response but let me ask you did you even read it, or am I just wasting time with you if I do not spend an hour at a time in fit of rage? Seriously do you like this? because I'm old and grow tired of it quickly. even now I just don't care enough to go any more I've been ready for the next subject..

next please.

[Angrboda]

Yeah, I can see how attributing non-existent motives to me and claiming I said things I didn't say is "turning the other cheek."  Go on, Drich.  Pull the other one.  I'm sorry, but no bells on this one.

  Are you intentionally being obstinate?

You brought this "you have a response you have yet to address" at least three times asking for a point of reference/looking for a fight. I walked away at least 3 different times (turned the cheek) I did not respond in any way shape or form to you trying to bait me into blowing up a little comment into anything bigger.

It wasn't till one of your supporters decided to parrot back some of your concerns did I take the opportunity to not only explain my self but do it in such a way as to mimic the very act I was blasting you about. (taking a victory lap on the work or words of someone else/pretending I had won the upper hand) just to see if it would resonate.. Seems to me you demand of me (a response) when none is obligated. Or should I take your 3+ inquiries as an obligation you place on me to answer each and every pick a fight post you place, while you reserve the right to not respond to a day's work on my behalf? 

I'm not begging for a response but let me ask you did you even read it, or am I just wasting time with you if I do not spend an hour at a time in fit of rage? Seriously do you like this? because I'm old and grow tired of it quickly. even now I just don't care enough to go any more I've been ready for the next subject..

next please.

No, Drich, I didn't read it. And now I never will. And you have only yourself to blame for that. If you had asked me nicely, I might have obliged, but instead you were more interested in using the fact that I hadn't responded in an attempt to score points against me, which anyone reading my initial response to your post can see were clearly not deserved. The rest of this is just your usual nonsense of your trying to talk yourself out of a jam you've put yourself into and failing.

Have a nice day.

[Bucky Ball]

I found me some gospel verses (I do my Babble readings dee-voutly every day) in which this Jesus dude seems to be talking about our "friend" here, who congratulates himself that he gets to be judgmental and  speaks for non-hippy Jesus. 

"Then Jesus told this story to some who had great confidence in their own righteousness and scorned everyone else: 10 “Two men went to the Temple to pray. One was a Pharisee, and the other was a despised tax collector. 11 The Pharisee stood by himself and prayed this prayer[a]: ‘I thank you, God, that I am not like other people—cheaters, sinners, adulterers. I’m certainly not like that tax collector! 12 I fast twice a week, and I give you a tenth of my income.’

13 “But the tax collector stood at a distance and dared not even lift his eyes to heaven as he prayed. Instead, he beat his chest in sorrow, saying, ‘O God, be merciful to me, for I am a sinner.’ 14 I tell you, this sinner, not the Pharisee, returned home justified before God. For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.” Luke 18:9-14

[Jehanne]

The ancient Jews and Christians up through the 1st century, and somewhat beyond, believed in a flat Earth:

Wikipedia -- Biblical Cosmology