Not just catholics!

[WolfsChild]

Do you really think im concerned about what a piece of shit like you thinks about me? If so, then you are a stupid piece of shit.
Looking from anothier perspective.....you are still a piece of shit.

piece of shit must like be the penultimate insult at the zoo.
How about this hot rod.. how about rather than just being offended and start name calling everytime you get verbally smacked for falling a sleep at the intellectual wheel, how about trying to leave a topical Or if you are confused or don't know what I am talking about ASK A QUESTION post once in a while. how about not bailing on a topic just because the subject gets too deep for once. how about put yourself in danger of seeing a different perspective once in a while. I am far more forgiving and will answer any and all questions happily explain things if you just ask.. but if you want to have a word smack down I'm good with that too.

---

You know, in my job, I've actually seen reports on shit like what Dripshit just described.  And I can tell you right here and now that there is no way in hell where what Dripshit said doesn't constitute rape.  Now the circumstances of the girl would have to be taken into account before passing judgement (maybe she too was raped herself, maybe she was raised by a religious bastard like Dripshit and her morality warped, maybe she's not capable of making an informed adult decision herself), but what she did in the hypothetical is a crime.

And what about the husband and wife team? is he guilty of rape?

Why do you guys only answer one or the other and never both?

---

Having forced sex is rape no matter if your married or not the wife can call the police and get him done for rape it will stand as that by law it is rape

ok... care to answer the other half of the scenario? two kids having consesentual sex is this not also rape? The law says it is, what says your pop moral standard?

Its if one is younger than the other it is rape an ten year olds are not capble of making that division at 10 the 15 years old is almost an adult 3 yearsfrom being an adult they should know better

[Drich]

@Drich
Rape, sexual assault of minors, and coprophagy... bet your gawd is thrilled to have you as a spokesperson.

Paul tells us in 1 cor 9:
19 I am free. I belong to no other person, but I make myself a slave to everyone. I do this to help save as many people as I can. 20 To the Jews I became like a Jew so that I could help save Jews. I myself am not ruled by the law, but to those who are ruled by the law I became like someone who is ruled by the law. I did this to help save those who are ruled by the law. 21 To those who are without the law I became like someone who is without the law. I did this to help save those who are without the law. (But really, I am not without God’s law—I am ruled by the law of Christ.) 22 To those who are weak, I became weak so that I could help save them. I have become all things to all people. I did this so that I could save people in any way possible. 23 I do all this to make the Good News known. I do it so that I can share in the blessings of the Good News.

So yeah, having someone like me who can talk about rape who can talk about porn or coprophagy in a place like this with people like you ( who have two uncensored sections of the web site so all manner of things can be discussed or pics shared... it is not a bad thing to have someone who was apart of that culture ans is not ashamed to speak about any of it openly.

Or would you rather i pretend such things did not happen and do not exist so that the pop moral among you who will speak on such things is the only light or only voice heard when it comes to these subjects? Look back at history before you answer out of spite.

---

piece of shit must like be the penultimate insult at the zoo.
How about this hot rod.. how about rather than just being offended and start name calling everytime you get verbally smacked for falling a sleep at the intellectual wheel, how about trying to leave a topical Or if you are confused or don't know what I am talking about ASK A QUESTION post once in a while. how about not bailing on a topic just because the subject gets too deep for once. how about put yourself in danger of seeing a different perspective once in a while. I am far more forgiving and will answer any and all questions happily explain things if you just ask.. but if you want to have a word smack down I'm good with that too.

---

And what about the husband and wife team? is he guilty of rape?

Why do you guys only answer one or the other and never both?

---

ok... care to answer the other half of the scenario? two kids having consesentual sex is this not also rape? The law says it is, what says your pop moral standard?

Its if one is younger than the other it is rape an ten year olds are not capble of making that division  at 10 the 15 years old is almost an adult  3 yearsfrom being an adult  they should know  better

and to you there are no excuses or reason why these two should ever be allowed to do what they did? no special circumstance like if she where raped or if he where a fully physically mature 6'0 better than peach fuzz mustache 10 year old? and they both full wanted  the experience?

So if both are rape should the law be allowed to prosecute both to the fullest extent of the law?

Should the baby stter be chaged as a sexual predator and not only receive federal prison time but be branded the rest of her life?

And should the husband also get federal prison time and labeled a sex offender and have to register just because his wife finishes an hour before he does?

---

So advocating pedophilia then and no there are no "very mature 10 year olds "  and if he enjoyed it it's only because he doesn't understand that he's just been violated sexually . The fact Derpch thinks this is any kind of moral dilemma is shameful .

You know, in my job, I've actually seen reports on shit like what Dripshit just described.  And I can tell you right here and now that there is no way in hell where what Dripshit said doesn't constitute rape.  Now the circumstances of the girl would have to be taken into account before passing judgement (maybe she too was raped herself, maybe she was raised by a religious bastard like Dripshit and her morality warped, maybe she's not capable of making an informed adult decision herself), but what she did in the hypothetical is a crime.

Also like topoint out you too see this as a moral delima you... not.. smart ...person.

Do you see the black highlighted portion?

Did I add that/ those conditions you added that makes her prosecution questionable is also known as a MOARAL DILEMMA. Other wise prosecution or absolution from any crime would be straight forward.. Allthe BS about her being raped or her moral judgement being effected by one thingor another makes straight forward decisions impossible with out these other factors being considered. which makes it a dilemma.

seriously do you people even think before you speak? You slam me fr doing something and in giving your version you only underscore what I said!

[The Grand Nudger]

Consenting to sex while not being in the mood and consenting to sex while wishing your partner were quicker to finish are both still consenting to sex, dipshit.

[WolfsChild]

Its still rape in the eyes of the law normal people can see that not a dick head who believes that one person who says no can be forced to have sex against there will its rape but you also believe biggest load of shit word of god that says itsok for men can rape there wifes even if she says no

[The Grand Nudger]

You're giving drich too much credit for understanding his own questions.  He doesn't understand the difference between statutory rape, the crime of rape, and unenthusiastic sex.

That's what he's been asking the boards about, as though this were some profound dilemma of "pop morality".

[LastPoet]

Well, if my wife is not on the mood, i'll do something else. Its not like she owes me sex, and sex being more than one enjoiying eatchother. No fun for me if she isn't having.

[madog]

Heres a thought Drich, throw away your bronze age porn manual and ...

... a) Only put your dick where its wanted

... b) Remove it when its not wanted

... c) Don't fuck children

If in doubt find somewhere private and use your hand

[Drich]

piece of shit must like be the penultimate insult at the zoo.
How about this hot rod.. how about rather than just being offended and start name calling everytime you get verbally smacked for falling a sleep at the intellectual wheel, how about trying to leave a topical Or if you are confused or don't know what I am talking about ASK A QUESTION post once in a while. how about not bailing on a topic just because the subject gets too deep for once. how about put yourself in danger of seeing a different perspective once in a while. I am far more forgiving and will answer any and all questions happily explain things if you just ask.. but if you want to have a word smack down I'm good with that too.

---

And what about the husband and wife team? is he guilty of rape?

Why do you guys only answer one or the other and never both?

---

ok... care to answer the other half of the scenario? two kids having consesentual sex is this not also rape? The law says it is, what says your pop moral standard?

Its if one is younger than the other it is rape an ten year olds are not capble of making that division  at 10 the 15 years old is almost an adult  3 yearsfrom being an adult  they should know  better

THE OTHER 1/2 of the scenario douche, the other 1/2 meaning the older couple READ THE OP You've comment on the young couple like 3 times I get it you think young people having sex is rape got it no need to keep telling/why are you so obsessed with answering this part of the question only? Now move on to the second half of the question or can't you see past the young couple scenario?

---

Consenting to sex while not being in the mood and consenting to sex while wishing your partner were quicker to finish are both still consenting to sex, dipshit.

hey stupid f-er..

YOUR PEERS DON'T SEEM TO THINK SO!!!

So before you try and hang me for asking you a question maybe take the time to blast the people who "answered the question wrongly in your eyes!!!"

What a pos, for busting my balls for asking a simple question that your own peer group "Morality" has them divided on!
I KNOW IT IS NOT RAPE DUMMY!

The first scenario IS rape but most of you "morally good people" don't see it that way, and yes dumb ass the second scenario is NOT rape yet, most of you see it as so, even if they avoid the question like the plague! Look at how wolfie blasts "christians" for being so backward for having consensual sex even if it is simply unwanted. These are the morons you should be telling the second scenario was consensual! Not Me! 
I know it was consensual as I wrote out the two senerios to test or rather show all of you how much of a corrupt system pop morality is! excusing rapists while condemning christians for having consensual sex!!!




So Again in case you missed it your people say, no it is not rape for kids to have sex (Meaning even if you call it Rape, none of you agreed to persecute the the girl and make her a sex predator or send her to prison for rape/prosecute her to the fullest extent of the law. No most of you are willing to call it rape and sweep it under the rug, by looking for reasons to excuse this coming from a supposed real life social worker!) 

Now hypocrites who think this way (prosecute the christian having consensual sex and not prosecuting the rapist teen age girl) doesn't that put you on par with the RC church when it covers up crime? It seems you are all willing to forgive from a position of pop morality and want to sweep things under the rug, but when the church does the same thing it is evil? Hey dummies what makes the church evil when you are guilty of the same thing and you are "moral?"

So the OP is right... IT IS NOT JUST CATHOLICS WHO SWEEP RAPE UNDER THE RUG!
ATHEIST AS A MATTER OF "MORALITY" DO IT TOO!!!

---

Well, if my wife is not on the mood, i'll do something else. Its not like she owes me sex, and sex being more than one enjoiying eatchother. No fun for me if she isn't having.

it's so funny how you guys just cherry pick everything. in this specific scenario I also gave a second situation, but only one is answered to frame me in a negative light only. 

Does you own personal integrity mean so little to you that it is ok in your eye to have me reprimand your dishonest approach to your posts each time you do it?? or do you honestly only see one point at a time? can't your mind process several related scenarios all at once?

---

Heres a thought Drich, throw away your bronze age porn manual and ...

... a) Only put your dick where its wanted

... b) Remove it when its not wanted

... c) Don't fuck children

If in doubt find somewhere private and use your hand

As you can now see little thinker, i had a much bigger point. a point that you all have impaled yourselves on with your oh so 'good moral standard.' looks like the only real monsters here are they people who can call two kids having sex rape but care to do nothing about it just like the RC church... but want to persecute christians for having consensual sex. why??because in your twisted evil inspired version of morality so long as both parties agree. in your heart you think there is no restrictions. even if your mind can still identify a law broken. Yet at the same timeyou need for both parties to have fun is so paramount you are blinded to actual consensual sex just because it is not enjoyed by both people.

So A is wrong... Put your dick where you have consent douche bag even if it is not wanted.

B is wrong here is how to fix it: Remove it when consent is with drawn or you hit that priapism 3 hour threshold, then see a doctor!

C is incomplete, and completely mis represents the scenario.. because even if children are screwing other children someone needs to be held accountable.

It's funny how all of you ditched my original scenerio of children having sex to your own version of adults having sex with children to make things wrong.. why would your mind automatically go there when those cards never once hit the table by my deal? Yet everyone of you who wantto "rebuke me" has shifted my post to include children having sex with adults. how broken and or perverse is you mind that it allows you to go there when that discussion was never brought up?

[madog]

C is incomplete, and completely mis represents the scenario.. because even if children are screwing other children someone needs to be held accountable.

 

Your anology was about an adult with a position of trust fucking a child  ..... similar to priests, misnisters etc ....

Why you would want to raise paedophilia and rape to make a point is beyond me  ...  

[Drich]

C is incomplete, and completely mis represents the scenario.. because even if children are screwing other children someone needs to be held accountable.

 

Your anology was about an adult with a position of trust fucking a child  ..... similar to priests, misnisters etc ....

Why you would want to raise paedophilia and rape to make a point is beyond me  ...  

no... that is what you turn it into, my intellectually dishonest little atheist buddy...

I said a 16 or 17 year old female baby sitter had spontanious sex with a very mature 10 year old. the question was is this rape. if so (second part of the question) should the 16 year old girl be thrown into federal prison made to do the max the gov allows and then upon release be viewed as a state mandated sexual predator.

That my dishonest atheist buddy was the first question.. while some of you could see the technical side of statior rape and identified rape NONE OF YOU Where Willing To Ruin This Girl's life over this consensual act. Again I pointed even the legit child services person among you was looking for reasons to excuse the baby sitter citing her own personal experience on cases like this she dealt with! You where no different.

The second question was about a married couple. but you knew this going in.. you answered the first 1/2 of the first question and even then tried to spin the narrative by making it sound like I was not asking a question at all by providing my approval. This intention to smear me shows you intentionally misrepresented the question from the beginning.and now you are doing so to try and escape my final conclusion that you and your buddies are the same type of monsters the OP makes catholics and other christians out to be for technically allowing the same thing in your heart/mind.