Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Not just catholics!
May 24, 2019 at 8:36 pm
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2019 at 8:39 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(May 24, 2019 at 11:58 am)Drich Wrote: (May 23, 2019 at 10:53 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Yes, she should. Gee, that was tough.
Once again, Drich the good Christian, showing himself to be the most vile, immoral member of the forum. Child rape apologizing is a new low for you, man. I’m pretty happy with my pop morality that doesn’t condone adults having sex with ten year olds, you sick fuck.
where was this answer a week ago? or the first time you address this... Oh, that's right you can now see where I am going and know how to answer so you can feign moral superiority..
Huh? A week ago? Pardon me that I take care of two small children all day, and I’m not always up to date on every debate happening on the forum. Yesterday was the first time I’ve read through this thread.
Quote:what happened to the other 1/2 of the question? didn't understand how to answer that one?
Which rape is worse rape? Why is that even a discussion? Also, you didn’t explicitly frame scenario two as a rape, so I’m not sure what I’m supposed to be comparing here. Did she consent to the sex because she wanted to make her husband feel good, even though she really wasn’t in the mood? That’s not rape, Drich. It’s generosity. It’s making the decision to put the needs of the person you love before your own. I’m not sure what that has to do with an adult raping a child.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Not just catholics!
May 28, 2019 at 11:19 am
(May 24, 2019 at 8:36 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: (May 24, 2019 at 11:58 am)Drich Wrote: where was this answer a week ago? or the first time you address this... Oh, that's right you can now see where I am going and know how to answer so you can feign moral superiority..
Huh? A week ago? Pardon me that I take care of two small children all day, and I’m not always up to date on every debate happening on the forum. Yesterday was the first time I’ve read through this thread.
Quote:what happened to the other 1/2 of the question? didn't understand how to answer that one?
Which rape is worse rape? Why is that even a discussion? Also, you didn’t explicitly frame scenario two as a rape, so I’m not sure what I’m supposed to be comparing here. Did she consent to the sex because she wanted to make her husband feel good, even though she really wasn’t in the mood? That’s not rape, Drich. It’s generosity. It’s making the decision to put the needs of the person you love before your own. I’m not sure what that has to do with an adult raping a child.
aain sport where where you two weeks ago? I revealed everything you said then... I just guess you are smarter than your peers. or you just repeated the big reveal as outlined by me so you can appear to be more righteous than your peers... eitherway it's kinda been done now for 2 weeks.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Not just catholics!
May 28, 2019 at 5:59 pm
(May 28, 2019 at 11:19 am)Drich Wrote: (May 24, 2019 at 8:36 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Huh? A week ago? Pardon me that I take care of two small children all day, and I’m not always up to date on every debate happening on the forum. Yesterday was the first time I’ve read through this thread.
Which rape is worse rape? Why is that even a discussion? Also, you didn’t explicitly frame scenario two as a rape, so I’m not sure what I’m supposed to be comparing here. Did she consent to the sex because she wanted to make her husband feel good, even though she really wasn’t in the mood? That’s not rape, Drich. It’s generosity. It’s making the decision to put the needs of the person you love before your own. I’m not sure what that has to do with an adult raping a child.
aain sport where where you two weeks ago? I revealed everything you said then... I just guess you are smarter than your peers. or you just repeated the big reveal as outlined by me so you can appear to be more righteous than your peers... eitherway it's kinda been done now for 2 weeks.
Okay. 👍
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Not just catholics!
May 29, 2019 at 4:57 am
(May 23, 2019 at 2:58 pm)Drich Wrote: (May 23, 2019 at 1:40 pm)Deesse23 Wrote: Show me where i did that. Right, you cant, because i didnt. is your family stupid as well or did it just come from your mother side? maybe your father's or where you dropped from a very high place onto your head which prevents you from basic comprehension outside of goes on in your damaged head?
Now take a moment and feel the burn of me insulting you and or yourfamily/who's ever is at fault for your general stupidity... sunk in yet? feel outraged? take a few more moments, think of all the things you mother or father did to make you like you are, and 3... 2... 1... you should be at least alittle toasty.. Now push it all down an get ready to move on, Now end that thought, because changing direction, IE I am going to address you above statement...
Dear geesse In my original quote, way way back in post #12 I came up with this scenario where a 10 year old boy was molested/RAPED by his slightly older but still under aged baby sitter.. now if you where not such a stupid self centered T-what, you would see, know understand and be able to identify that the 10 year old boy being raped by a slightly older baby sitter even if he was willing by me identifying as rape means I never question the legality of a 10 year old's ability to choose to have sex... Only stupid people or perverted people would assume I was asking about the morality despite what I had actually communicated. because either 1 their sheer ignorance would not allow them to see I have already identified it as a crime or 2 their perverse nature/proclivity towards petaphilia would not allow them to see I am not struggling with a the legality of a 10year old having sex and thus do not need to be reminded as they obviously do, and subsequently project their need for a reminder that 10 year olds haveing sex is wrong on to me.
IE, (I will answer the question I feel like answering and not the one you asked)
do you under stand? Still no? let me put it in words you can understand..
Unga boonga (cave man speak) Drich say 10 year old having sex is rape even if done by slightly older girl... even if girl still minor it still rape unga boonga... you understand now?
Unga boong Drich question not be about whether rape or not... Unga boonga drich question be should slightly older girl go to jail and treated like adult? should minor girl who had raped 10 year old boy be listed as a sexual predator rest of life unga bunga... dat- drich question. not whether or not 10 year old can have sex.
You understand or do drich need to dumb it down for you more?
Quote: Is english your first language?
I'm not quoting you moron those are my words!!!
What i asked you, and what you havent answered yet is:
Do you?
That was you question to me... then when I answer you you think my answer is a quote from you...omg you are too stupid to be real!
(May 23, 2019 at 2:58 pm)madog Wrote: A 17 year old is an adult ... a 10 year olds, regardless of how mature you think they are, are children ... simple 
As regards sentencing, that is decided by looking at all the circumstances ...
ah... no
18 is the magic number douche bag across the world except for where it is 19 and a few hold out where the legal age is still 21.. you see it use to be 21 til we started conscripting 18 year old to goto war. so where is it not 18?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult
In most of the world, including most of the United States, India and China, the legal adult age is 18 (historically 21) for most purposes, with some notable exceptions:
In most of the world, including most of the United States, India and China, the legal adult age is 18 (historically 21) for most purposes, with some notable exceptions:
- British Columbia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Nunavut, Yukon Territory in Canada (though there are some exceptions in which Canadians may be considered legal adults in certain situations[citation needed]); Nebraska and Alabama in The United States, and South Korea (19)
- Indonesia (20)
- United States purchasing alcohol and entering bars has a minimum age of 21.
and as far as sexual development is concerned it is possible for the boy to be going through puberty as well as the girl again the scenario allows the boy to be very mature while the girl could very well be a late bloomer. which again could put them both on equal ground as far as sexual and mental development goes.
Eitherway and again I still identify the act as rape despite any and all details. the question again for the two dumbest members of this website and any other shuld the older girl be sent to prision and made to serve a full term and then upon release be made to register as a sex offender?
That my dishonest douche is the question I asked, not is rape a crime
The age of consent is 16 in the UK.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Not just catholics!
May 29, 2019 at 10:03 am
and the age of consent in the philippines is 12, and 13 in japan..
1) No friggin body asked how old the age of consent was in the UK
2)Doesn't make it right just because it is legal douche.
how or why is that such a hard concept for you to grasp? are you any less a pedophile if you have sex with a 12 year old in the philippines? no! The only diffeence is you may not go to jail there but YOU ARE STILL A PEDOPHILE FOR HAVING SEX WITH A 12 YEAR OLD!!!
Again big picture small minded people, just because your f-ed up country allows pedophilia from a certain age forward does make you a hero for having sex with a kid!
Why would you be proud of that fact? to me that would be a shameful thing which would reflect poorly on me and those in my community who elected such men to office that thought this was a good idea!
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Not just catholics!
May 29, 2019 at 12:43 pm
(May 29, 2019 at 10:03 am)Drich Wrote: and the age of consent in the philippines is 12, and 13 in japan..
1) No friggin body asked how old the age of consent was in the UK
2)Doesn't make it right just because it is legal douche.
how or why is that such a hard concept for you to grasp? are you any less a pedophile if you have sex with a 12 year old in the philippines? no! The only diffeence is you may not go to jail there but YOU ARE STILL A PEDOPHILE FOR HAVING SEX WITH A 12 YEAR OLD!!!
Again big picture small minded people, just because your f-ed up country allows pedophilia from a certain age forward does make you a hero for having sex with a kid!
Why would you be proud of that fact? to me that would be a shameful thing which would reflect poorly on me and those in my community who elected such men to office that thought this was a good idea!
In the Vatican its 14.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 2746
Threads: 4
Joined: September 21, 2018
Reputation:
33
RE: Not just catholics!
May 29, 2019 at 1:19 pm
(May 29, 2019 at 10:03 am)Drich Wrote: YOU ARE STILL A PEDOPHILE FOR HAVING SEX WITH A 12 YEAR OLD!!! What if its a really, really mature 12y old? 
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Not just catholics!
May 29, 2019 at 1:28 pm
(May 29, 2019 at 1:19 pm)Deesse23 Wrote: (May 29, 2019 at 10:03 am)Drich Wrote: YOU ARE STILL A PEDOPHILE FOR HAVING SEX WITH A 12 YEAR OLD!!! What if its a really, really mature 12y old?
In the USA you can if you are in the right states apparently.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...30266.html
Quote:More than 200,000 children were married in the US over the past 15 years, new figures have revealed.
Three 10-year-old girls and an 11-year-old boy were among the youngest to wed, under legal loopholes which allow minors to marry in certain circumstances.
The minimum age for marriage across most of the US is 18, but every state has exemptions – such as parental consent or pregnancy – which allow younger children to tie the knot.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 16833
Threads: 461
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Not just catholics!
June 3, 2019 at 8:07 am
Indeed, it's not just Catholics. Some religions do have it publicly that kids have to performs certain stuff as religious right that Catholic priests and nuns can only dream about. Like listen what they do to young boys in Papua New Guinea in a tribe called Sambia
Posts: 16833
Threads: 461
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Not just catholics!
June 11, 2019 at 12:34 am
Episode from a podcast few months ago
Quote:Angie Jay, spiritual abuse survivor and political activist, joins Chuck and Brady to share her horrifying Evangelical experience when she served as a missions intern at the age of 18. Far from home and family, the missions organization leadership forced her to describe -- in mixed company and with great detail -- the long history of sexual abuse she had experienced, which started when she was only 2, in order to "heal." When the leaders felt Angie wasn't responding to their abusive counsel in the way they wanted, the main male leader took the situation to a horrifying new level. He told her the sexual abuse left a demon in her that he needed to remove. And, without her consent, that's what he attempted to do.
The complex nightmare continues when she returned home and much of her home church leadership believed her abusers over her or showed her no empathy.
https://thelifeafter.podbean.com/e/deliv...episode-2/
|
