Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2024, 3:17 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
I feel like it’s important to tell you, john, that the record for outstanding is batshittery is high on this board.

......we’re only 22 pages in.....
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 5, 2019 at 4:38 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/...f1f4679e11

and to be specific

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1...10.02210.x

Also, these are peer-reviewed.  Undoubtedly your objections have the same veracity and have been published or likely going to be with what I assume are airtight arguments to the contrary.


Here is another dealing with transitional fossils.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1...10.02039.x

In short.  FSM wept.

Are these just your own personal assortment of favorite articles? Or do they bare some relationship with my conversation with Gae Bolga? They seem disconnected from the discussion, care to clarify?
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
Does johnism care to clarify, well...anything?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 5, 2019 at 4:50 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: I feel like it’s important to tell you, john, that the record for outstanding is batshittery is high on this board.

......we’re only 22 pages in.....

Let's hope you're able to link a simple article before then. I would love to spend those extra pages discussing it with you.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
Good, then go read up on model based control.

I’ve been here for a decade. I’ll still be here when you get done.

In the meanwhile, the sheer existence of model based control theories demonstrates that you were mistaken. Whether you decide to do your own homework or not, nothing can change that now.

Is there an evolutionary explanation for the relationship between vision and consciousness, between sensory input and qualia. One that describes its potential origin and function. Yes. The only gap here, described by you, is a gap in johnist knowledge about evolutionary explanations.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 5, 2019 at 4:54 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Good, then go read up on model based control.

I’ve been here for a decade.  I’ll still be here when you get done.

In the meanwhile, the sheer existence of model based control theories demonstrates that you were mistaken.  Whether you decide to do your own homework or not, nothing can change that now.

Ok, you dont want to participate. Regardless, thanks for the discussion so far. I look forward to your participation in the future.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 5, 2019 at 4:52 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(August 5, 2019 at 4:50 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: I feel like it’s important to tell you, john, that the record for outstanding is batshittery is high on this board.

......we’re only 22 pages in.....

Let's hope you're able to link a simple article before then. I would love to spend those extra pages discussing it with you.

And, I would love for you to spend some time explaining to me on what evidence you have decided to accept the proposition of creationism as true versus evolution by natural selection. I think that would be a far more elucidating discussion.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 5, 2019 at 5:03 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(August 5, 2019 at 4:52 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: Let's hope you're able to link a simple article before then. I would love to spend those extra pages discussing it with you.

And, I would love for you to spend some time explaining to me on what evidence you have decided to accept the proposition of creationism as true versus evolution by natural selection.

Certainly, I'd love to. But my memory isn't as good as it used to be, you see. Can you give me a link to the proposition in question about creationism vs evolution? I want to get you the explanation and evidence you're looking for, I just don't quite recall such a proposition being made by me on this thread. I have a vague memory of saying creationism is compatible with evolution, but I guess I'm delusion as well as amnesic, seeing things that aren't there.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
At work.

(August 5, 2019 at 11:45 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(August 5, 2019 at 11:38 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: So topic about eye turned into discussion about conciousness - go figure.

Why wouldn't it? If you know anything about vision, or followed the discussion, you would know that the two go hand in hand. If anything my OP is criticising those who look at the eye without looking at things such as consciousness. So thanks for the demonstration.

Hello Mr Breezy! Big Grin

Thank you for your reply.

Currently doing my best to keep up with the thread.

Soo.... what then do you say of organisms that have eyes but do not have neurons, so no brains and hence probably no discernable consciousness?

Cheers.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 5, 2019 at 5:09 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

(August 5, 2019 at 11:45 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: Why wouldn't it? If you know anything about vision, or followed the discussion, you would know that the two go hand in hand. If anything my OP is criticising those who look at the eye without looking at things such as consciousness. So thanks for the demonstration.

Hello Mr Breezy! Big Grin

Thank you for your reply.

Currently doing my best to keep up with the thread.

Soo.... what then do you say of organisms that have eyes but do not have neurons, so no brains and hence probably no discernable consciousness?

Cheers.

I would ask to see what specific organism you have in mind to better answer that question. But most of the time, organisms have some other way of making use of that sensory information. In bacteria the energy produced by light sensitive pigments goes straight into powering their flagella for example. In my view, such a bacteria has successfully evolved a functional system, that works for its needs in its environment. It has no eye, no brain, etc. So clearly, organisms can find pockets where sensation, perception, and behavior, are all balanced at any given stage of evolution. There are many such pockets inhabited by many different species. My issue is with accounts that ignore the balance between components that are needed for survival. when they talk about how an organism evolved.

Different species have different biological needs to survive in their environment. Our species needs neurons and consciousness, take that away in any increment you want, and the medical literature is full of examples of what happens.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Chemical evolution of amino acids and proteins ? Impossible !! Otangelo 56 10783 January 10, 2020 at 2:59 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Richard Dawkins claims we should eat lab-grown human meat Alexmahone 83 12850 March 18, 2018 at 6:47 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Theory of Evolution, Atheism, and Homophobia. RayOfLight 31 5743 October 25, 2017 at 9:24 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Evolution and the Texas Sharp Shooter Fallacy Clueless Morgan 12 2642 July 9, 2015 at 10:17 am
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  生物学101:Genetics and Evolution. Duke Guilmon 2 2249 March 14, 2015 at 12:32 pm
Last Post: Dystopia
  Death and Evolution Exian 4 2072 November 2, 2014 at 11:45 am
Last Post: abaris
  Myths and misconceptions about evolution - Alex Gendler Gooders1002 2 2141 July 8, 2013 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Tonus
  Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. Mystic 59 32377 April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Evolution, the Bible, and the 3.5 Million Dollar Violin - my article Jeffonthenet 99 59088 September 4, 2012 at 11:50 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  difference between Micro and macro evolution Gooders1002 21 9637 May 19, 2012 at 12:27 am
Last Post: Polaris



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)