RE: Atheism, Gnosticism & the Problem of Evil
March 5, 2021 at 10:20 am
(This post was last modified: March 5, 2021 at 10:40 am by Mister Agenda.)
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
| Poll: If There Were a God, Would You be Angry with Him? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| No. | 3 | 33.33% | |
| Yes, but only for not intervening against human evil. | 0 | 0% | |
| Yes, because I believe natural evil exists & it ought not to. | 5 | 55.56% | |
| None of the above, I would only be angry if this God upheld the immoral proscriptions of the Old Testament. | 1 | 11.11% | |
| Total | 9 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Atheism, Gnosticism & the Problem of Evil
|
|
RE: Atheism, Gnosticism & the Problem of Evil
March 5, 2021 at 10:20 am
(This post was last modified: March 5, 2021 at 10:40 am by Mister Agenda.)
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Quote:I noticed the user Catholic lady posted an OP asking how you would react if the Christian God showed himself to you & explained, with his divinely perfect logic, that he is moral. This is not possible, no such explanation would satisfy my criteria for morality. My issue with the Christian God is that he is described with ultimate characteristics, perfection, able to know everything, able to do everything. Assuming this is true, it must logically follow that any suffering, great or small, is inflicted as the result of this god's intention. There would be no suffering if this god desired there to be no suffering. It further must logically follow that this cannot be excused by the claim that this god has a plan, the execution of which requires human (or any, for that matter) suffering to take place. For, a god capable of absolutely anything could achieve whatever goals he wishes, in any way he wishes, and it also further follows that it cannot happen in any way but that which he wishes. It further must follow that it is illogical for an all-knowing, all-seeing, all-powerful god to resort to any kind of long term plan, for any reason. Plans exist specifically because it is not possible to do anything and everything all at once, with the metaphorical snap of a finger. To have to resort to a plan requires a god limited in his power and reach. To resort to a plan in spite of no such limits means that it can only be an unnecessary action undertaken deliberately. RE: Atheism, Gnosticism & the Problem of Evil
March 5, 2021 at 6:46 pm
(This post was last modified: March 5, 2021 at 6:46 pm by Nay_Sayer.)
Silly nazi, Of course not. I could never be mad at FSM.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
Conservative trigger warning.
![]()
God is like a thug. "I can torture you. So, better obey me". And according to the bible he proposes such existence for as long as he like. And its natural that many people get rebellious.
Christianity would work so much better if they just excised the old testament stuff, Jesus was a really revolutionary figure with revolutionary ideas. OT God was just one of thousands of angry warrior king types with magical powers, there's really nothing special about that myth whatsoever, and that religion likely would have died out with all other ancient religions if it hadn't been used to as a traditional and credibility foundation for a new religion which is, for the most part, not really similar at all.
RE: Atheism, Gnosticism & the Problem of Evil
March 6, 2021 at 2:18 pm
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2021 at 2:18 pm by Angrboda.)
(March 6, 2021 at 2:00 pm)purplepurpose Wrote: God is like a thug. "I can torture you. So, better obey me". And according to the bible he proposes such existence for as long as he like. And its natural that many people get rebellious. "That's a nice eternal soul youse got there. It'd be a shame if something were to happen to it." ![]() (March 6, 2021 at 2:08 pm)Ryantology Wrote: Christianity would work so much better if they just excised the old testament stuff, Jesus was a really revolutionary figure with revolutionary ideas. OT God was just one of thousands of angry warrior king types with magical powers, there's really nothing special about that myth whatsoever, and that religion likely would have died out with all other ancient religions if it hadn't been used to as a traditional and credibility foundation for a new religion which is, for the most part, not really similar at all. Agree to disagree. Not a single positive idea of Jesus found in the Gospels is original, let alone revolutionary. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
(March 5, 2021 at 8:37 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(March 5, 2021 at 8:07 am)Seax Wrote: I don't deny human evil, I deny that evil exists in nature. No, but humans (and other cognitively advanced animals) are capable of acting in unnatural ways. By unnatural, I mean contrary to what is naturally advantageous. There are things that are completely impossible in nature, like a four sided triangle, and then there are things that are impossible in the long run because they are conflict with the laws of nature; because they are against the Will of God. This includes everything from the elements that rearly occur naturally and decay quickly, to behaviors or actions. Humans that act in ways contrary to what is naturally advantageous, that engage in pathological behavior, can be said to be acting unnaturally, and we are by no means the only species to engage in pathological behavior. This is evil.
Well, for starters, a four sided triangle would be a square.
I mean, if someone can be this dense, it's easy to be confused about nature or even the nature of evil. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|