5 Dead 40 Injured in Waukesha Wi.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Spew more nonsense.

I have never gotten a good answer as to how many firearms would coddle the right wing's insecurities.

1 billion, 10 billion, 50 billion? Give me a number.

6,374,288,906 guns is the correct number. Now, PLEASE stop saying this.

Boru

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

@Huggy Bear

Then you should probably look up the meaning of the word ‘vintage’.

Boru

[Huggy Bear]

He actually was, the film is a western. Not saying it was an authentic antique revolver, but that was the style of gun that was fired.

---

Look you moron, you stated...


*emphasis mine*

The range instructor clearly stated it was an EQUIPMENT MALFUNCTION.

I'm also curious to what "stupid shit" you think the guy did to cause the weapon to fire?

Stupid fuck...


How the hell would he know if it was " equipment malfunction" without disassembling and examining the firearm ? Answer - he wouldn' t.  He said that for benefit of the camera.



You need changing Huggies.


You're full.

*emphasis mine*
How he 'KNEW' is because he saw that the guys finger was not on the trigger, if the gun fires without your finger being on the trigger, it is an obvious malfunction, he is LITERALLY standing right there looking at the guy handle the weapon. Hell, you can see his finger is clearly resting on the side of the weapon just before he inserts the magazine.

You KNOW 1911s real well?

I do.  I have one that I built from parts. ( no two parts from same gun. ) I have 50+ years experience with them. I even qualified expert with one in the service.

I literally know these guns inside and out.

You? You saw a motherfucking video.....

In what world is video not evidence?

You seen video evidence of a gun discharging 'spontaneously', yet your cognitive dissonance won't allow you to admit you were mistaken.

[The Architect Of Fate]

How the hell would he know if it was " equipment malfunction" without disassembling and examining the firearm ? Answer - he wouldn' t.  He said that for benefit of the camera.

Why would he do that?

[arewethereyet]

IA said the word 'racist' and Huggy came running to his dog whistle.

Maybe now he's not so worried about trans and gay people.

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

Stupid fuck...


How the hell would he know if it was " equipment malfunction" without disassembling and examining the firearm ? Answer - he wouldn' t.  He said that for benefit of the camera.



You need changing Huggies.


You're full.

*emphasis mine*
How he 'KNEW' is because he saw that the guys finger was not on the trigger, if the gun fires without your finger being on the trigger, it is an obvious malfunction, he is LITERALLY standing right there looking at the guy handle the weapon. Hell, you can see his finger is clearly resting on the side of the weapon just before he inserts the magazine.

You KNOW 1911s real well?

I do.  I have one that I built from parts. ( no two parts from same gun. ) I have 50+ years experience with them. I even qualified expert with one in the service.

I literally know these guns inside and out.

You? You saw a motherfucking video.....

In what world is video not evidence?

You seen video evidence of a gun discharging 'spontaneously', yet your cognitive dissonance won't allow you to admit you were mistaken.

 
You have a ghost gun? Aren't they illegal?

[Huggy Bear]

@Huggy Bear

Then you should probably look up the meaning of the word ‘vintage’.

Boru

Not sure what you're trying to say as the guns are still being made to this day.

---

@onlinebiker 

seems like you slunk off, heres another video for you.

[Fireball]

*emphasis mine*
How he 'KNEW' is because he saw that the guys finger was not on the trigger, if the gun fires without your finger being on the trigger, it is an obvious malfunction, he is LITERALLY standing right there looking at the guy handle the weapon. Hell, you can see his finger is clearly resting on the side of the weapon just before he inserts the magazine.


In what world is video not evidence?

You seen video evidence of a gun discharging 'spontaneously', yet your cognitive dissonance won't allow you to admit you were mistaken.

 
You have a ghost gun? Aren't they illegal?

If he made it from existing parts, the serial number of the frame would still be on it. I have a .22 carbine that has had everything but the barrel and the housing for the action replaced. That housing still has the serial number on it. Not a ghost gun. If you've read a lot of what OLB posts, you will know that he interfaces with law enforcement on a regular basis, as they use his gun range. I'd expect at least one of them to take exception to any unlawful weapon that he possesses.

[onlinebiker]

*emphasis mine*
How he 'KNEW' is because he saw that the guys finger was not on the trigger, if the gun fires without your finger being on the trigger, it is an obvious malfunction, he is LITERALLY standing right there looking at the guy handle the weapon. Hell, you can see his finger is clearly resting on the side of the weapon just before he inserts the magazine.


In what world is video not evidence?

You seen video evidence of a gun discharging 'spontaneously', yet your cognitive dissonance won't allow you to admit you were mistaken.

 
You have a ghost gun? Aren't they illegal?

1. A quote " ghost gun" is one without serial numbers. 

The reciever on my 1911 has serial numbers.

2. Guns without serial numbers are not illegal. I own several. Store branded guns -Wards, J.C Penny, Sears (JC Higgins) are all built for those stores by such companies as High Standard, Winchester and Remington ( to name a few) and prior to 1968 rarely came eith serial numbers. Prior to 68 manufacturers p ut serial numbers on for their convenience - not as a governmental mandate. As they did not carry the warranty on those guns - they did not bother with the extra step of stamping serial numbers.

3. It is not illegal to own a gun without serial numbers.

---

Stupid fuck...


How the hell would he know if it was " equipment malfunction" without disassembling and examining the firearm ? Answer - he wouldn' t.  He said that for benefit of the camera.



You need changing Huggies.


You're full.

*emphasis mine*
How he 'KNEW' is because he saw that the guys finger was not on the trigger, if the gun fires without your finger being on the trigger, it is an obvious malfunction, he is LITERALLY standing right there looking at the guy handle the weapon. Hell, you can see his finger is clearly resting on the side of the weapon just before he inserts the magazine.

You KNOW 1911s real well?

I do.  I have one that I built from parts. ( no two parts from same gun. ) I have 50+ years experience with them. I even qualified expert with one in the service.

I literally know these guns inside and out.

You? You saw a motherfucking video.....

In what world is video not evidence?

You seen video evidence of a gun discharging 'spontaneously', yet your cognitive dissonance won't allow you to admit you were mistaken.

Seriously you you need to shut the fuck up and quit making yourself look more stupid than we already know you to be.


You can "clearly see his finger is off the trigger"?

Good trick with your x- ray eyes superman....

You are seeing the guy from his left side and he is shooting it right handed. His trigger finger is obscured by the pistol - IF the lighting was good enough to see - which it isn't.

The rest of your " evidence" will be given the same regard as your namesake... A diaper full of shit.

[Rev. Rye]

You KNOW 1911s real well?

I do.  I have one that I built from parts. ( no two parts from same gun. ) I have 50+ years experience with them. I even qualified expert with one in the service.

I literally know these guns inside and out.

You? You saw a motherfucking video.....

In what world is video not evidence?

You seen video evidence of a gun discharging 'spontaneously', yet your cognitive dissonance won't allow you to admit you were mistaken.

Let's face it, from what I've seen of him, that's basically his approach to learning new information that contradicts his preferred narrative.

If you point out there's no evidence BLM protests last year actually led to a spike in COVID cases, he insists that that's only because nobody was looking for any, and when you point out that epidemiologists were actually expecting at least some spike but wound up finding none (because the protesters actually had some grasp of how bad the virus is and how to mitigate its effects), he just dismisses it.

If you point out that one car manufacturer deciding they're going to phase out gas-powered cars over the next 15 years doesn't mean the price of gas is going to go down to $1/gallon soon, he angrily changes the subject.

If you point out that his claim that America leaving Afghanistan is going to lead to China swooping in and making a killing mining lithium makes no sense, he insists it's still profitable enough that they'd try.

And when I actually point him in the direction of a ballistics textbook (which is, as far as I can tell, the standard textbook on the subject) and the section that points out that, yes, such accidental shootings are, in fact, possible, he pretty much insists he knows better.

The only time I remember him actually accepting a correction I made from him is when I pointed out that it is, in fact, illegal under both Illinois and Wisconsin law for 17-year-olds to possess firearms.

Are you familiar with Innuendo Studios' Alt-Right Playbook series? While I don't think his views count as alt-right (and I know he throws a hissy fit every time anyone tries to put a label on his beliefs), his rhetorical strategies are such that you could probably remake most of the official (non-endnote) videos with examples specifically from him.