Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 6:39 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Evolution cannot account for morality
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
Quote:Ah, I think I understand. Evolution is merely a process that we attribute to life and there is no indication that evolution could ever apply to anything else. [Image: smile.gif]
The theory of evolution applies to life and nothing else. Abiogenesis is not the same theory. Stellar formation is not the same theory. Even if the word evolution could be applied to anything (the evolution of music) these are not the same thing.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
(May 29, 2022 at 2:38 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: If we are going with goddidit then I assume he(?) was sampling some herb or other botanical when coming up with the platypus. May have made it out of leftover parts.

When I think of the "God did it" gap answer, I think of a dog left in a house too long who ends up tearing up the house because you didn't give it enough attention.
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
The statement “evolution can not account for morality” is as shallow, nonsensical, ignorant and insipid as “evolution can not account for my farting in front of my in-laws at 6:30pm”.

evolution made it possible for me to be able to fart.  evolution made a in-law relationship  feasible and desirable, from a certain point of view.   why I have these particular set of in-laws, why i was with them and why I farted at this particular time is largely up to the contingent circumstances of that day of my life.  

So it is with morality.  evolution made it feasible for us to have morality.  evolution selected a slight preference for reciprocity in what morality appeals by giving populations which holds it amongst themselves an survival advantage.   It is contingent circumstances of our culture that made us think we have some special morality.
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
It's easy to accept that the way humans evolved resulted in us having morality.

What I don't see yet is why evolution would necessarily result in us having any particular morality. I mean, it would be nice to think that natural selection favors societies in which everyone lives happily together and shares resources. But is there any scientific evidence that this is true? Maybe strong DNA is more effectively passed down if one or two tough guys enslave harems and rape them to produce lots of babies.

Is there any empirical, repeatable, quantifiable evidence that evolution gives rise to the kind of morality that we happen to like?
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
(May 29, 2022 at 9:00 pm)Belacqua Wrote: It's easy to accept that the way humans evolved resulted in us having morality.

What I don't see yet is why evolution would necessarily result in us having any particular morality. I mean, it would be nice to think that natural selection favors societies in which everyone lives happily together and shares resources. But is there any scientific evidence that this is true? Maybe strong DNA is more effectively passed down if one or two tough guys enslave harems and rape them to produce lots of babies.

Is there any empirical, repeatable, quantifiable evidence that evolution gives rise to the kind of morality that we happen to like?
Now that's a model I can get behind.
"Imagination, life is your creation"
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
(May 29, 2022 at 9:00 pm)Belacqua Wrote: It's easy to accept that the way humans evolved resulted in us having morality.

What I don't see yet is why evolution would necessarily result in us having any particular morality. I mean, it would be nice to think that natural selection favors societies in which everyone lives happily together and shares resources. But is there any scientific evidence that this is true? Maybe strong DNA is more effectively passed down if one or two tough guys enslave harems and rape them to produce lots of babies.

Is there any empirical, repeatable, quantifiable evidence that evolution gives rise to the kind of morality that we happen to like?

As I said earlier, the rise of agriculture at the dawn of the Neolithic era demanded cooperation between larger and larger groups of human beings. More humans resulted in a greater likelihood of an infant surviving to reproductive age. Instead of 9 out of 10 human infants perishing in the 1st year of life, maybe only 1 out of 2 did. As cooperation aided survival, that genetic trait was passed down. Remember that infanticide occurred all throughout the Paleolithic and Mesolithic eras, and so, infants and small children who lacked amenable traits were simply abandoned or killed by their parents or other kin. To survive in that era, an infant or young child needed to cooperate with Mom & Dad.
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
(May 29, 2022 at 9:00 pm)Belacqua Wrote: It's easy to accept that the way humans evolved resulted in us having morality.

What I don't see yet is why evolution would necessarily result in us having any particular morality. I mean, it would be nice to think that natural selection favors societies in which everyone lives happily together and shares resources. But is there any scientific evidence that this is true? Maybe strong DNA is more effectively passed down if one or two tough guys enslave harems and rape them to produce lots of babies.

A few guys with harems wouldn't do it. More likely you're looking at a lot of soldiers doing the whole rape and pillage thing for several millennia. And a lot less organized general rapiness for a few million years before that.

Quote:Is there any empirical, repeatable, quantifiable evidence that evolution gives rise to the kind of morality that we happen to like?

You're looking at competing drives here. Biologically we optimize for one solution, socially we optimize for another. And of course there are numerous stable solutions for many problems. Is it any wonder that we're a crazed little species? One might predict that this state of affairs would give rise to a whole slew of different cultures with core commonalities and near infinite variety around the edges, which is exactly what we see.

In the special case of rape we're almost certainly evolved to find it even more traumatic than it clearly is. The selection pressure is for the strongest women who resist the most to breed only with the strongest, rapiest men, so nature hardwires in some extra emotional pain and suffering to help ensure that's how it goes down. This is what we observe in ducks and they know nothing of morality. No room in their tiny, smooth birdy brains for that. Nature's a real Mother some times.
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
(May 29, 2022 at 9:34 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: [...]

And of course there are numerous stable solutions for many problems. Is it any wonder that we're a crazed little species? One might predict that this state of affairs would give rise to a whole slew of different cultures with core commonalities and near infinite variety around the edges, which is exactly what we see.

[...]

Yes, this seems like the most likely explanation to me.

Perhaps it's a bit like language acquisition. Each baby is born with no language, but with a capacity to pick one up quite quickly. Which one he acquires depends on who he's with. Then if he doesn't have one by a certain age we'd say there's some deficit involved.

Likewise with morality. We are evolved to pick up some set of standards that align us with our immediate society. But what those standards are depend entirely on when and where we're born. 

Some societies emphasize cooperation and empathy, while others prefer competition. Both are natural, and both came about, indirectly, through evolution. 

That's my guess.
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
(May 29, 2022 at 9:54 am)chiknsld Wrote: This may of course be too much to ask of the social deviant though. The persons who have hidden agendas, malicious intentions, etc. Someone with a hidden agenda is not interested in proper discourse.

Talking about yourself in public is not a very good habit.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply
RE: Evolution cannot account for morality
(May 29, 2022 at 2:38 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: If we are going with goddidit then I assume he(?) was sampling some herb or other botanical when coming up with the platypus. May have made it out of leftover parts.

As Pterry Pratchett was fond of writing "why the duck-billed platypus?"
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Am I right to assume, that theists cannot prove that I am not god? Vast Vision 116 32100 March 5, 2021 at 6:39 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Theists: how do you account for psychopaths? robvalue 288 39225 March 5, 2021 at 6:37 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Being cannot come from Non-being Otangelo 147 13141 January 7, 2020 at 7:08 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why religious cannot agree. Mystic 46 7641 July 6, 2018 at 11:05 pm
Last Post: warmdecember
  Debate: God & Morality: William Lane Craig vs Erik Wielenberg Jehanne 16 3351 March 2, 2018 at 8:06 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Why as an Atheist I Cannot Sin Rhondazvous 35 7928 September 17, 2017 at 7:42 am
Last Post: Brian37
  10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer Foxaèr 431 124518 August 12, 2017 at 4:22 pm
Last Post: Astonished
  The Biblical Account of the Creation - A new look RonaldMcRaygun 10 2915 March 31, 2017 at 5:47 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Morality versus afterlife robvalue 163 30355 March 13, 2016 at 6:40 pm
Last Post: RoadRunner79
  Morality quiz, and objective moralities robvalue 14 4471 January 31, 2016 at 7:15 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)