Did Jesus want to create a poli-theism religion?

[Eclectic]

In Iran, we now see that all kinds of thoughts are in support of religion and anti-religion. We see that the methods of suppressing the opposite views are abundant. And sometimes the government itself supports the opposite cheating  and apply its views on the opposition and reformists.

Muslims use numerous ways to combat exquisite religions.

Two methods of multiple methods are as follows:

1) In a way of repression, the leader of the movement is killed and the main assistants of the massacre are killed.

2) In another way, the leader of the movement is killed and the main aides escapes.8

In both ways, the thought and ideology of the leader of the movement are manipulated. Sometimes the companions manipulate to get closer to the ruling insight. Sometimes the sovereignty itself does the same thing as we said.

There are a few cases in the religion of Christ that make us think that the true Christ must be completely away from Judaism, and after his death, Christ's religion has become an eclecticism of European religion and Judaism.


Interesting items:

1. The Jewish religion is full of violence, but the religion of Christ is the opposite.

2- Christ was friendly with the community and would constantly guest them (women sex workers and poor and physical and mental patients)

3. The name of the prophets of Jesus, European, was chosen to make the European religion more clear:

Matthew = Methus

Luke = Lucas

Mark = Marcus

John = Johannes

Paul

Wasn't the message of using European names that the purpose of Christ's religion should be the same as the European poly-theism?


4- Trinity: Father - son and Holy. Do I think this is the same as the European religion?

5. Christ called himself God like the European religions whose gods were human or the prophets of God.

6. Brought the concept of martyrdom and martyr from Europe to the Abrahamic religions.

7. Christ was soon executed in a brutal way. That is, his comments were very exquisite who quickly ordered his murder.

8. His disciples escaped in fear and the first Bible book was written very late. It seems that when they wanted to continue his way or by the deeds of the ruling religion or because of the fear of execution, they greatly added Judaism to the polyism of Christ.

I think Christ's aim was to fight the Jewish religion completely and bring true kindness. Reduce violence in the Israeli community that day, bringing a polyism to Israel. He would guess the people and the crisp of the community to support them.

what is your opinion?

[Ahriman]

Not really sure what you're asking here.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

In Iran, we now see that all kinds of thoughts are in support of religion and anti-religion. We see that the methods of suppressing the opposite views are abundant. And sometimes the government itself supports the opposite cheating  and apply its views on the opposition and reformists.

Muslims use numerous ways to combat exquisite religions.

Two methods of multiple methods are as follows:

1) In a way of repression, the leader of the movement is killed and the main assistants of the massacre are killed.

2) In another way, the leader of the movement is killed and the main aides escapes.8

In both ways, the thought and ideology of the leader of the movement are manipulated. Sometimes the companions manipulate to get closer to the ruling insight. Sometimes the sovereignty itself does the same thing as we said.

There are a few cases in the religion of Christ that make us think that the true Christ must be completely away from Judaism, and after his death, Christ's religion has become an eclecticism of European religion and Judaism.


Interesting items:

1. The Jewish religion is full of violence, but the religion of Christ is the opposite.

2- Christ was friendly with the community and would constantly guest them (women sex workers and poor and physical and mental patients)

3. The name of the prophets of Jesus, European, was chosen to make the European religion more clear:

Matthew = Methus

Luke = Lucas

Mark = Marcus

John = Johannes

Paul

Wasn't the message of using European names that the purpose of Christ's religion should be the same as the European poly-theism?


4- Trinity: Father - son and Holy. Do I think this is the same as the European religion?

5. Christ called himself God like the European religions whose gods were human or the prophets of God.

6. Brought the concept of martyrdom and martyr from Europe to the Abrahamic religions.

7. Christ was soon executed in a brutal way. That is, his comments were very exquisite who quickly ordered his murder.

8. His disciples escaped in fear and the first Bible book was written very late. It seems that when they wanted to continue his way or by the deeds of the ruling religion or because of the fear of execution, they greatly added Judaism to the polyism of Christ.

I think Christ's aim was to fight the Jewish religion completely and bring true kindness. Reduce violence in the Israeli community that day, bringing a polyism to Israel. He would guess the people and the crisp of the community to support them.

what is your opinion?

(Bold mine)

Then why did he instruct the Apostles to preach only to the Jews? Why did he insist that his aim wasn’t to change Mosaic law, but to fulfill it?

If he wanted to destroy Judaism, it seems like a better way to go would be to rile up the Gentiles and preach against the Law.

Boru

[LinuxGal]

1. The Jewish religion is full of violence, but the religion of Christ is the opposite.

Sure.

Luke 19:26-27

For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him. But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

[Jehanne]

1. The Jewish religion is full of violence, but the religion of Christ is the opposite.

Sure.

Luke 19:26-27

For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him. But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

Jesus never spoke these words.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Sure.

Luke 19:26-27

For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him. But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

Jesus never spoke these words.

Sure he did. You just quoted those words.

Boru

[Jehanne]

Jesus never spoke these words.

Sure he did. You just quoted those words.

Boru

And, Atlantis was/is real?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Sure he did. You just quoted those words.

Boru

And, Atlantis was/is real?

When quoting scripture, it’s immaterial whether Jesus was a historic figure. Even if Jesus was completely ahistorical and the Bible a complete work of fiction, Jesus said what he said, in exactly the sense that Obi Wan said, ‘These aren’t the droids you’re looking for.’

Boru

[Ahriman]

And, Atlantis was/is real?

When quoting scripture, it’s immaterial whether Jesus was a historic figure. Even if Jesus was completely ahistorical and the Bible a complete work of fiction, Jesus said what he said, in exactly the sense that Obi Wan said, ‘These aren’t the droids you’re looking for.’

Boru

An atheist sticking up for Jesus.......now I've seen everything.

[The Grand Nudger]

Whatever jesus wanted, if there was a jesus, was lost in the sauce. We got the religion that shamans and warlords wanted.