Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 6, 2026, 4:48 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
#51
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 20, 2023 at 2:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 20, 2023 at 2:38 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: As far as I know, JWs believe that there is no afterlife, but that there will be a resurrection of the dead at the Judgement Day. Which, I think, can be refuted by the fact that canibalism exists.

Isn’t resurrection a form of afterlife? I mean, you’re alive, then dead, then alive again. Being alive after you’ve died is life after death, which is what ‘afterlife’ means.

What’s cannibalism got to do with resurrection?

Boru
Heme iron.
What fresh hell can this be? - Dorothy Parker
Reply
#52
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 20, 2023 at 2:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 20, 2023 at 2:38 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: As far as I know, JWs believe that there is no afterlife, but that there will be a resurrection of the dead at the Judgement Day. Which, I think, can be refuted by the fact that canibalism exists.

Isn’t resurrection a form of afterlife? I mean, you’re alive, then dead, then alive again. Being alive after you’ve died is life after death, which is what ‘afterlife’ means.

What’s cannibalism got to do with resurrection?

Boru

Well, it depends on how we define afterlife. I think that, when you say "afterlife", most people imagine some astral bodies, or at least some form of incorporeal existence.

If one person eats another person, how could both of them be resurrected?
Reply
#53
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
Your medications need to be adjusted.
What fresh hell can this be? - Dorothy Parker
Reply
#54
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 20, 2023 at 3:43 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(June 20, 2023 at 2:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Isn’t resurrection a form of afterlife? I mean, you’re alive, then dead, then alive again. Being alive after you’ve died is life after death, which is what ‘afterlife’ means.

What’s cannibalism got to do with resurrection?

Boru

Well, it depends on how we define afterlife. I think that, when you say "afterlife", most people imagine some astral bodies, or at least some form of incorporeal existence.

If one person eats another person, how could both of them be resurrected?

The 144 000 who go to Heaven as Jesus’ personal aides will be resurrected as ‘spirit beings, so that should satisfy your personal definition. Even those of the Great Flock who don’t make it to Heaven will live forever in an Earthly paradise, which would seem to require at least some measure of incorporeality.

I think your point about cannibalism would only apply if one Jehovah’s Witness devoured another, a situation which is fairly unlikely.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#55
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
I assume you’re wondering how they come back if the body has been destroyed. Easy…..the same thing can raise the dead….gives them new ones.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#56
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 20, 2023 at 3:43 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(June 20, 2023 at 2:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Isn’t resurrection a form of afterlife? I mean, you’re alive, then dead, then alive again. Being alive after you’ve died is life after death, which is what ‘afterlife’ means.

What’s cannibalism got to do with resurrection?

Boru

Well, it depends on how we define afterlife. I think that, when you say "afterlife", most people imagine some astral bodies, or at least some form of incorporeal existence.

If one person eats another person, how could both of them be resurrected?

One person eating another has several possible meanings in English.    But I will assume you mean consuming another person for food.   In that case I assume they resurrect as Russian matryoshka dolls?
Reply
#57
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 20, 2023 at 3:51 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Your medications need to be adjusted.

I talked to my psychiatrist today, she told me to stop taking Biperiden unless my hands are really shaking. Until today, I was taking half a pill every day. She left Risperidone (the antipsychotic) at the same dose I was taking before, the lowest possible dose.
Reply
#58
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
I asked that question about cannibalism on Christianity StackExchange.
Reply
#59
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
So you are going from forum to forum with the same nonsense?

Do you keep doing that till you get an answer that you like?
What fresh hell can this be? - Dorothy Parker
Reply
#60
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 20, 2023 at 5:17 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: So you are going from forum to forum with the same nonsense?

Do you keep doing that till you get an answer that you like?

It's just that I am far more likely to get a response from somebody who knows about Jehovah's Witnesses theology on Christianity StackExchange than here. And that cannibalism argument isn't mine at all. If I remember correctly, Keith Augustine also used it in one of his papers, and cited somebody else related to that argument. They probably have a somewhat-sensible response to it.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How you feeling about "Baby Reindeer" and it goes against Sigmund Freud beliefs Reinard9 22 5695 August 8, 2024 at 5:15 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  The Kalam Cosmological argument. JJoseph 113 27918 January 10, 2024 at 12:38 am
Last Post: Astreja
  A 21st Century Ontological Argument: does it work. JJoseph 23 7066 January 9, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 39582 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Is the Argument from Degrees contradictory to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics? FlatAssembler 49 11643 June 26, 2023 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  Jesus on the Gospel, not any Christian Church, and the Afterlife KerimF 31 9050 May 17, 2023 at 9:13 am
Last Post: KerimF
  Your personal views on the Afterlife Mystic Monkey 31 26361 May 12, 2023 at 10:36 am
Last Post: awty
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 41367 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  I have made a new YouTube video about afterlife... FlatAssembler 32 8310 July 12, 2022 at 2:35 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  My Almighty VS your argument against it Won2blv 43 11521 May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)