Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 21, 2024, 11:11 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
#11
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
Xavier is wicked and evil
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming"  -The Prophet Boiardi-

      Conservative trigger warning.
[Image: s-l640.jpg]
                                                                                         
Reply
#12
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
(July 10, 2023 at 10:05 pm)Nishant Xavier Wrote: I've seen a study that says: "The [2015 US Transgender] survey claims that 11% of female respondents reverted back to their original sex. Transgender men had a reversion rate of 4%."

Arewethereyet, and GN: "Circumcision and clitoral removal are barbaric.  Talk to your fellow abrahamists about it.". Yes, so-called female-circumcision is completely and inherently wrong, and God never asked for such a horrible thing; as for male circumcision, it was always planned as something only temporary, and Jesus Christ has redeemed us Christians from the necessity of it; painful circumcision now being replaced, by the Blood of Christ, by painless Baptism. As St. Thomas observes, by circumcision men (like Abraham etc) of old testified that Christ was yet to come, and painful expiation of sins had yet to be made. But by Holy Baptism, we now testify that Christ has already come, and redeemed us from our sins on the Cross. The Moral Precepts of the Gospel go beyond that of the OT, for e.g. Christ commands to forgive unconditionally and love even our Enemies and not just our Neighbors only, but many of the ceremonial precepts of the OT were nailed to the Cross.

So take it up with the Judaizers, you know, those whose claims the Apostles rejected in the Council of Jerusalem in A.D. 48, in Acts 15, when they unanimously decreed Circumcision was in no way necessary for Christians, but only the Grace of Jesus Christ. Jews of course, still under the law, believe the same error, and our Muslim friends also, misguided into what is basically an Arabian form of Judaism, with some changes, practice circumcision and other errors under the law.

Regards,
Xavier.

You seriously don't believe that Christian boys are being circumcised?
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
#13
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
(July 10, 2023 at 10:16 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: Xavier is wicked and evil

[Image: Professor_Charles_%27X%27_Xavier.png]
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#14
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
So, I found it on page 111 of this document. That said, somehow, I doubt that you actually looked very far into it. You probably just looked into this Human Life International page that actually uses the phrasing you quoted.

Why do I doubt you looked too far into it? Well, that exact same page that included the cited statistics also said this: "Most of those who de-transitioned did so only temporarily: 62% of those who had de-transitioned reported that they were currently living full time in a gender different than the gender they were thought to be at birth." Which means that the rate of total, long-term detransition is closer to 3% overall.

And that's not all! The survey actually goes into the reasons they gave for doing so. And what percentage of the detransitioners do you think said "They realized that gender transition was not for them"? 5%. There's a lot of other reasons given, and the vast majority of them were due to external pressure (from friends, family, employers, what have you). All this information was on the same fucking page as the stat you cited.

So, the actual overall rate of detransition for reasons that aren't related to external pressures forcing them back into the closet? 0.4%. That's 1 in 250. And, make no mistake, those 1 in 250 deserve all the support they can get, but denying the other 249 the help they need is no solution.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#15
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
(July 10, 2023 at 10:17 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:
(July 10, 2023 at 10:05 pm)Nishant Xavier Wrote: I've seen a study that says: "The [2015 US Transgender] survey claims that 11% of female respondents reverted back to their original sex. Transgender men had a reversion rate of 4%."

Arewethereyet, and GN: "Circumcision and clitoral removal are barbaric.  Talk to your fellow abrahamists about it.". Yes, so-called female-circumcision is completely and inherently wrong, and God never asked for such a horrible thing; as for male circumcision, it was always planned as something only temporary, and Jesus Christ has redeemed us Christians from the necessity of it; painful circumcision now being replaced, by the Blood of Christ, by painless Baptism. As St. Thomas observes, by circumcision men (like Abraham etc) of old testified that Christ was yet to come, and painful expiation of sins had yet to be made. But by Holy Baptism, we now testify that Christ has already come, and redeemed us from our sins on the Cross. The Moral Precepts of the Gospel go beyond that of the OT, for e.g. Christ commands to forgive unconditionally and love even our Enemies and not just our Neighbors only, but many of the ceremonial precepts of the OT were nailed to the Cross.

So take it up with the Judaizers, you know, those whose claims the Apostles rejected in the Council of Jerusalem in A.D. 48, in Acts 15, when they unanimously decreed Circumcision was in no way necessary for Christians, but only the Grace of Jesus Christ. Jews of course, still under the law, believe the same error, and our Muslim friends also, misguided into what is basically an Arabian form of Judaism, with some changes, practice circumcision and other errors under the law.

Regards,
Xavier.

You seriously don't believe that Christian boys are being circumcised?
I know I was. And I sure as shit wasn't raised Jewish.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#16
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
(July 10, 2023 at 10:05 pm)Nishant Xavier Wrote: as for male circumcision, it was always planned as something only temporary, and Jesus Christ has redeemed us Christians from the necessity of it

[Image: can-i-get-amen.gif]
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#17
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
(July 10, 2023 at 10:27 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: So, I found it on page 111 of this document. That said, somehow, I doubt that you actually looked very far into it. You probably just looked into this Human Life International page that actually uses the phrasing you quoted.

Why do I doubt you looked  too far into it? Well, that exact same page that included the cited statistics also said this: "Most of those who de-transitioned did so only temporarily: 62% of those who had de-transitioned reported that they were currently living full time in a gender different than the gender they were thought to be at birth." Which means that the rate of total, long-term detransition is closer to 3% overall.

And that's not all! The survey actually goes into the reasons they gave for doing so. And what percentage of the detransitioners do you think said "They realized that gender transition was not for them"? 5%. There's a lot of other reasons given, and the vast majority of them were due to external pressure (from friends, family, employers, what have you). All this information was on the same fucking page as the stat you cited.

So, the actual overall rate of detransition for reasons that aren't related to external pressures forcing them back into the closet? 0.4%. That's 1 in 250. And, make no mistake, those 1 in 250 deserve all the support they can get, but denying the other 249 the help they need is no solution.
And even if he's right that's a pitifully small number of detransitioners and doesn't even come close to doing what transphobes cite it for which of course is trying to invalidate trans identities.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#18
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
(July 10, 2023 at 10:36 pm)Helios Wrote:
(July 10, 2023 at 10:27 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: So, I found it on page 111 of this document. That said, somehow, I doubt that you actually looked very far into it. You probably just looked into this Human Life International page that actually uses the phrasing you quoted.

Why do I doubt you looked  too far into it? Well, that exact same page that included the cited statistics also said this: "Most of those who de-transitioned did so only temporarily: 62% of those who had de-transitioned reported that they were currently living full time in a gender different than the gender they were thought to be at birth." Which means that the rate of total, long-term detransition is closer to 3% overall.

And that's not all! The survey actually goes into the reasons they gave for doing so. And what percentage of the detransitioners do you think said "They realized that gender transition was not for them"? 5%. There's a lot of other reasons given, and the vast majority of them were due to external pressure (from friends, family, employers, what have you). All this information was on the same fucking page as the stat you cited.

So, the actual overall rate of detransition for reasons that aren't related to external pressures forcing them back into the closet? 0.4%. That's 1 in 250. And, make no mistake, those 1 in 250 deserve all the support they can get, but denying the other 249 the help they need is no solution.
And even if he's right that's a pitifully small number of detransitioners and doesn't even come close to doing what transphobes cite it for which of course is trying to invalidate trans identities.

And looking at the reasons given actually undermines their concern trolling, because they’re the people responsible for 95% of it.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#19
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
(July 10, 2023 at 10:27 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:
(July 10, 2023 at 10:17 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: You seriously don't believe that Christian boys are being circumcised?
I know I was. And I sure as shit wasn't raised Jewish.
You and a frightening number of other people

https://worldpopulationreview.com/countr...by-country
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#20
RE: Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights.
(July 10, 2023 at 10:39 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:
(July 10, 2023 at 10:36 pm)Helios Wrote: And even if he's right that's a pitifully small number of detransitioners and doesn't even come close to doing what transphobes cite it for which of course is trying to invalidate trans identities.

And looking at the reasons given actually undermines their concern trolling, because they’re the people responsible for 95% of it.
Oh of course they don't really care about any of this it's all just political theater to push their real agenda.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Frankenstein monster is kinda like Trans folks or people RantingManchester 58 560 21 minutes ago
Last Post: Sheldon
  Dawkins loses humanist title Silver 165 11884 June 6, 2021 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Peebothuhlu
  Richard Dawkins interviews Saudi Arabian atheist Rana Ahmad AniKoferBo 2 941 July 22, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Brian37
Information [Serious] How many reasonable solutions are there to any particular social issue? Prof.Lunaphiles 69 9771 April 11, 2020 at 8:55 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Ricky Gervais won Dawkins award this year Fake Messiah 13 2872 September 6, 2019 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: brewer
  International Blasphemy Rights Day! chimp3 29 4355 September 29, 2018 at 8:10 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  My biggest issue with theists DodosAreDead 73 13827 August 5, 2018 at 12:55 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Dawkins writing kid's version of "The God Delusion" - you mad bro? Silver 35 6858 August 2, 2018 at 9:08 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Geoff Robson has a hardon for Dawkins Silver 7 1955 May 10, 2018 at 5:55 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  What Major Intellectual Issue Most Keeps You From Accepting The Christian Narrative? Captain Hook 324 42691 March 21, 2018 at 1:11 pm
Last Post: Silver



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)