Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 12, 2025, 11:56 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
#41
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
Judas, Arizona does not have a permit requirement for open carry. Now, and I know this is a stretch for you to understand, there is no longer a permit law for concealed carry.

PHOENIX – The Arizona House voted Thursday to make the state the third in the nation to allow people to carry concealed weapons without a permit, sending the governor a bill that would allow Arizonans to forego background checks and classes that are now required.

The legislation, approved by the House 36-19 without discussion, would make it legal for most U.S. citizens 21 or older to carry a concealed weapon in Arizona without the permit now required. Currently, carrying a hidden firearm without a permit is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $2,500.

Sen. Russell Pearce, a Mesa Republican who sponsored the measure, said last week that he added changes requested by Gov. Jan Brewer's office, an indication that she is likely to sign it. The governor can sign or veto the measure, or allow it to become law without action.

If the legislation is enacted, Arizona would join Alaska and Vermont in not requiring permits to carry concealed weapons. Forty-five other states require permits for hidden guns, and two states — Illinois and Wisconsin — prohibit them altogether.

Supporters say gun restrictions only affect people who want to follow the rules because criminals will carry hidden guns regardless of the law. Nearly all adults can carry a weapon openly in Arizona, and they shouldn't face additional restrictions when they want to hide the weapon, supporters argue.

"What's dangerous is when they're in criminals' hands, not citizens' hands," said Rep. David Gowan, R-Sierra Vista, a bill sponsor.

Opponents argue legalizing concealed weapons will make it easier for criminals to carry them, endangering police. They also worry the bill would lead to more accidental gun discharges by people not adequately trained in firearm safety.

"We wouldn't give people driver's licenses without requiring training or testing. Why would we give people the ability to carry a concealed weapon anywhere?" said Rep. Steve Farley, D-Tucson.

There are more than 154,000 active concealed weapon permits in Arizona.

Under the measure, Arizonans would still be subject to the background checks federal law requires when buying firearms from a store. People carrying a concealed weapon would be required to tell a police officer if asked, and the officer could temporarily take the weapon while communicating with the gun carrier.

Under the legislation, permits still could be obtained on an optional basis so Arizonans could carry concealed weapons in states with reciprocity agreements. Permits also would be required to carry weapons in bars and restaurants that serve alcohol.


With the elevation of Brewer to the governor's office, Arizona gun-rights advocates have had a wave of success over the past two years.

The state in 2009 loosened its gun laws to lift a ban on guns in establishments that serve alcohol, although gun-bearers still cannot drink alcohol and establishments can ban firearms.

Brewer, a Republican who took office in January 2009, signed that measure into law. Her predecessor, Democrat Janet Napolitano, vetoed several measures pushed by gun-rights supporters before resigning to run the U.S. Homeland Security Department.

On Monday, Brewer signed two bills loosening gun restrictions. One bill broadened the state's current restrictions on local governments' ability to regulate or tax guns and ammunition.

The other bill declares that guns manufactured entirely in Arizona are exempt from federal oversight and are not subject to federal laws restricting the sale of firearms or requiring them to be registered.


There. Are. No. Permits. Needed. To. Carry. Concealed. In. Arizona. Do. You. Understand. Interstate. Reciprocity?
A last bit from Judas's reference site, AZDPS:

Due to changes made to A.R.S. 13-3112 during the 2010 and 2011 legislative sessions, effective July 20, 2011, the Concealed Weapons Permit Unit will no longer approve or renew concealed weapons training programs, training organizations, or firearms-safety instructors.

Amendments to A.R.S. 13-3112 in 2010 added a number of new ways in which an applicant could qualify for a concealed weapons permit through training or experience. These new additions removed the statutory minimum requirements which the Unit used to evaluate and approve training programs. Since there are no statutorily defined minimum requirements, the ability of DPS to evaluate, approve and support training programs has been greatly diminished. For this reason, after July 20, 2011, the Concealed Weapons Permit Unit will no longer update, support or sanction the use of the proprietary firearms-safety training course previously used to train permit holders. Furthermore, DPS will no longer review or approve any lesson plans and will no longer publish or update the “Legal Issues Relating to the Use of Deadly Force” guideline.

Additionally, since changes to A.R.S. 13-3112 made in the 2011 legislative session removed the authority for DPS to approve or authorize instructors and organizations, DPS will discontinue this practice. However, for those that currently hold an approval or authorization, current rules will still govern those approvals or authorizations until expiration pursuant to A.A.C. R13-9-309, which provides that a firearms-safety instructor approval is valid for 5 years from the date of issuance or renewal and the authorization of an instructor who holds a valid concealed weapon permit will expire when his current permit expires.

Going forward, liability for use of previously approved training programs rests solely on the instructor and or organization.


http://www.azdps.gov/services/concealed_weapons/
Trying to update my sig ...
Reply
#42
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
You're running a couple of different ideas together, Judas. There is a bill about allowing gun nuts to carry their fucking guns in bars ( as long as they don't drink!" which is separate from the dropping of the permit requirement for carrying concealed weapons.

The state continues to issue permits but it has more to do with the full faith and credit clause of the constitution.

Quote:Obtaining an Arizona concealed weapons permit is still a good idea. Reciprocity is a big factor. At this time, 29 states will honor your Arizona CCW — similar to their recognition of your Arizona driver’s license. Without a permit, your “right to carry” ends at the Arizona state line.

and

Quote:Published on Sunday, May 2, 2010 9:16 AM MST

Gov. Jan Brewer signed SB 1108, a bill that decriminalizes the carrying of concealed weapons in the state of Arizona, on April 16. This bill will become law 90 days after the Legislature closes.

Arizona will become the third state, following Vermont and Alaska, allowing concealed carry without a permit. Arizona will be the first state with a large urban population to enact such legislation.

What does this mean? In short, any person 21 years of age or older legally qualified to own a firearm may carry a firearm in concealment, where not restricted, without fear of arrest or prosecution. The current system for issue of concealed weapons permits will remain in place. Persons wishing to join the more than 154,000 Arizonans who already have concealed weapons permits will have that option.

http://www.arizonaccw.net/archives/112

Even though I would categorize the above site as a 'gun nut' site they still make some astonishingly good points about the entire issue.

I live in Arizona and the thought that every person nearby is carrying a gun is not at all comforting. There are just too many assholes out here.



Reply
#43
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
(August 10, 2011 at 12:08 pm)Minimalist Wrote: -----

I had a post all set to respond to you and as usual of late, when I hit the "POST REPLY" button, I get a server message saying the file is too large to upload yada yada hit the back button, etc... And when I do that the post screen is then blank.

Suffice to say, I didn't confuse anything.
A permit is required to carry concealed in restaurants that serve alcohol and bars, and the permitee is not permitted to imbibe. The law addresses posting requirements if a retailer refuses to allow concealed weapons in their establishment, including the requirements for bar owners, to post a sign if they prohibit admittance by persons with concealed weapons, even with a permit. It's all there at the top of the Bill in the first section. The signs are to be provided free of charge by the agency in charge of licensing such establishments. Here we call it the ABC.

"In life you can never be too kind or too fair; everyone you meet is carrying a heavy load. When you go through your day expressing kindness and courtesy to all you meet, you leave behind a feeling of warmth and good cheer, and you help alleviate the burdens everyone is struggling with."
Brian Tracy
Reply
#44
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
That's happened to me, man. Sucks.


But on the topic you have to watch your dates. The guns in bars law was signed in 2009 and the elimination of the permit requirement was in 2010.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/1...4742.shtml

I'm not aware that the second law amended the first and most bars and restaurants have signs prominently displayed ( as required by the first law) that weapons are not allowed. Those signs have not been removed.

Our idiot governor did ( at least ) veto a bill to allow guns on college campuses. I suppose I have to give her a passing grade on that one although the gun nuts went wild when she did it.
Reply
#45
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
There is no elimination of the permit requirement in 2010. The Bill/Law passed and signed by the Arizona Governor is linked in this thread so as to ascertain just that. Permits, permitee and training are all contained in the new law that is an amendment of the former open carry and right to carry concealed.
The signs in bars and restaurants that serve alcohol are a carry over from the old law and if one is permitted by the owner of the establishment to carry in those places, the gun owner is required to have a permit. And in the event alcohol is served, not imbibe.
"In life you can never be too kind or too fair; everyone you meet is carrying a heavy load. When you go through your day expressing kindness and courtesy to all you meet, you leave behind a feeling of warmth and good cheer, and you help alleviate the burdens everyone is struggling with."
Brian Tracy
Reply
#46
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
Quote:Favoring the constitutional right to bear arms over others' concerns about gun safety, Gov. Jan Brewer on Friday signed into law a bill making Arizona the third state allowing people to carry a concealed weapon without requiring a permit.
Reply
#47
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
LOL
If the 2nd Amendment was the inalienable right it declares, Brewer wouldn't have to sign a Bill into law to uphold that inalienable right for Arizona citizens to bear arms.
As it stands, go back to the law and do the keyword search. There are rules and there are permits and there are training requirements in the language.
"In life you can never be too kind or too fair; everyone you meet is carrying a heavy load. When you go through your day expressing kindness and courtesy to all you meet, you leave behind a feeling of warmth and good cheer, and you help alleviate the burdens everyone is struggling with."
Brian Tracy
Reply
#48
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
There are still permits and there are restrictions BUT any asshole with a gun can stick it in his pocket....or down the front of his pants in the case of the OP and blow his dick off...without a permit. Note in the original story that no one was asking this idiot if he had a permit or if she did.

In NY, he would have been handcuffed to his hospital bed for arraignment if he didn't have a permit.
Reply
#49
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
True enough, about NY.
However, what was stated in this thread previously was that there are no permits and no training required in the new law, period!
That, is not true. At this point sure enough anyone can put a gun in their pocket in Arizona. However, there are permits required for certain instances wherein someone is carrying concealed. As I've noted. Contrary to the aforementioned declaration there is no training required in the new law, that's not true.
One can even forgo background checks when buying a gun in Arizona, depending on certain circumstances. It's up to the individual gun shop.
Permits, contrary to the aforementioned declaration pertaining to their not existing any longer, remain as something someone can apply for to carry concealed, in the event they're going out of State and they want to safeguard their rights, while being in compliance with other State's CWP laws.
Suffice to say, it is a blatant misrepresentation of the truth that the new concealed weapons law absolutely does away with permits and training. Which was what was declared early on pages ago. And no matter how much that errant declaration is repeated, the black and white says it all.

Someone can put a gun in their pocket, down their pants, in their purse, or in a holster secured on the hip, in the belt, or under their arm in a shoulder harness. No permit required, except...
That exception, in black and white, is what is the issue with the aforementioned falsehood regarding the letter of the new law. As I've said repeatedly. But not ever again. Search and ye shall find.

"In life you can never be too kind or too fair; everyone you meet is carrying a heavy load. When you go through your day expressing kindness and courtesy to all you meet, you leave behind a feeling of warmth and good cheer, and you help alleviate the burdens everyone is struggling with."
Brian Tracy
Reply
#50
RE: Gun Nuts..A Whole New Spin
(August 10, 2011 at 3:34 pm)Judas BentHer Wrote: If the 2nd Amendment was the inalienable right it declares, Brewer wouldn't have to sign a Bill into law to uphold that inalienable right for Arizona citizens to bear arms.

I'm not certain the founding Fathers envisioned the mass production of small, concealable weapons dedicated to anti-Human actions when all they had to work with was large hunting rifles of many purposes.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What do you think about gun control? FlatAssembler 93 8253 February 21, 2022 at 10:06 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Another Gun Thread Silver 254 33364 September 29, 2020 at 7:48 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Proof gun control works GrandizerII 115 10846 August 23, 2019 at 4:28 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Why People Ignore Facts (Gun Control) Jade-Green Stone 22 2634 December 5, 2018 at 9:03 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Something very bad is coming to the whole world. WinterHold 7 1001 November 27, 2018 at 3:24 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  White House Gun Meeting Silver 23 3031 March 1, 2018 at 2:03 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The Despicability of Gun Turds Minimalist 5 1052 February 23, 2018 at 8:28 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  The Despicability of Gun Turds Minimalist 1 681 February 23, 2018 at 3:59 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Bringing A Knife To A Gun Fight Minimalist 23 2697 November 4, 2017 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Just Plain Nuts Minimalist 14 5776 June 4, 2017 at 8:35 pm
Last Post: The Industrial Atheist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)