Big Bang theory is not valid.

[Diamond-Deist]

So Dadadada Deist, are you ever going to get around to mass-energy and geometry of spacetime interactions or what?

Save your breath, I'm not going to be posting around here really and if I do decide to post anything at all it certainly won't be in response to one of yours.

[Napoléon]

So Dadadada Deist, are you ever going to get around to mass-energy and geometry of spacetime interactions or what?

Save your breath, I'm not going to be posting around here really and if I do decide to post anything at all it certainly won't be in response to one of yours.

Why not? Is his question not valid or something? Or maybe it is one you can't answer?

[Diamond-Deist]

Why not? Is his question not valid or something? Or maybe it is one you can't answer?

No it's because even if were going to ignore the fact that I've stated I'll not be continuing about 5 times already, it is because I don't think this forum is really for me anymore and two if your such know it alls and you know everything already why the hell do you want know about my bit of research? there's obviously nothing left for you to learn so you'll be wasting your time.

Also I'm finding this constant baiting thats being attempted very tedious.

[Epimethean]

You stated a fact somewhere?

[popeyespappy]

What did you expect? You storm in here proclaiming that you are going to show everyone one of the most popular theories in cosmology is fatally flawed and assert you can show that dark matter doesn’t exist. Instead of doing what you said you spend most of your time bragging about your connections and getting into pissing contests. You propose modified gravity laws as an alternative to dark matter without any discussion about them. Then you post a link to an article discussing an exciting new observation with no relevance to dark matter and claim it proves dark matter doesn’t exist. I still don’t know if you understand that the existence of an alternative explanation doesn’t really prove anything, or that the paper about the filaments simply confirmed the existence of visible matter predicted not only by the long abandoned plasma theory but also by the Big Bang model.

I suspect you wanted to talk about the things covered in Wun-Yi Shu’s paper Cosmological Models with No Big Bang. If so let’s do it. The main points of Shu’s model; 1) the speed of light and the gravitational "constant" are not constant, but vary with the evolution of the universe, 2) time has no beginning and no end, 3) the spatial section of the universe is a 3-sphere, and 4) the universe experiences phases of both acceleration and deceleration. These things are worthy of discussion even though at this point in time they fall well short of replacing the Big Bang as the most popular model for the origin of the universe.

[Napoléon]

Why not? Is his question not valid or something? Or maybe it is one you can't answer?

No it's because even if were going to ignore the fact that I've stated I'll not be continuing about 5 times already, it is because I don't think this forum is really for me anymore and two if your such know it alls and you know everything already why the hell do you want know about my bit of research? there's obviously nothing left for you to learn so you'll be wasting your time.

Also I'm finding this constant baiting thats being attempted very tedious.

Lol someone's got a pipe up their ass huh? I must apologise as I haven't read through the whole 20 odd pages of this thread and didn't see you say that, but I have seen you constantly avoiding people's questioning. If you say you don't want to continue why keep posting at all. If you're going to make the effort to respond to my question, why not respond to pop's? Fact is you don't like that question do you? I'm certainly not a know it all so really, if you could answer his question that would be great. Otherwise piss off and stop wasting everyone's time.

[Diamond-Deist]

Napo your a d*ck can't be asked with you anymore, Popeyespapy I appreciate you half know what your talking about, great, but this discussion has run it's course and if you really wanted to discuss it you like an adult you should have checked your attitude about 5 pages back at least.

As I said you obviously know everything you certainly don't have anything to learn from me, good luck with that.

I'd rather this thread be locked, I've discussed this with people that are qualified in this field, why the fk do you think I should continue that discussion with you when you bait like children and behave like prats?

Carry on baiting .........

[The Grand Nudger]

Carry on prattling.

[downbeatplumb]

I think this article from the BC is valid to this thread.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14811580

Scientists may have seen more hints of the dark matter purported to make up a majority of the mass in the Universe.

Researchers at the Cresst experiment in Italy say they have spotted 67 events in their detectors that may be caused by dark matter particles called Wimps.

[Napoléon]

Napo your a d*ck

Aww shucks, I'm really touched by that brilliantly conceived compliment. Did it take you all of 5 minutes to be so thoughtful?

As I said you obviously know everything you certainly don't have anything to learn from me, good luck with that.

I'm only asking why you won't answer a question. A question which is fundamental to your whole damn thread. Like I said, if you ain't got any more to say then do one. Throwing around insults is 10 times more childish than what you claim us to be.

I'd rather this thread be locked, I've discussed this with people that are qualified in this field, why the fk do you think I should continue that discussion with you when you bait like children and behave like prats?

Why the fuck did you post at all? Seriously? People have asked you valid questions but you keep avoiding them. Now you're playing the victim card because people have asked such questions, all I asked is why you wouldn't answer. No need to get all arsy with me. Did you seriously expect to come on here and not have your views challenged?