Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 11:57 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
pop morality
RE: pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: ROFLOL
Maybe Because I understand that a 'year' for a Jew is not based on the Gregorian calendar (meaning a year for you)


how many days in a year for a jew?
Reply
RE: pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote:
(April 4, 2016 at 9:39 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Why should anyone take seriously the views of someone who thinks a human being lived to be 900 years old, lol.   This thread reeks of desperation.

ROFLOL
Maybe Because I understand that a 'year' for a Jew is not based on the Gregorian calendar (meaning a year for you)

Wow. I'm not quite done catching up with the thread, but I had to stop when I saw this.

Did this little asshole seriously just imply that LFC doesn't know what the Gregorian calendar is?

"Meaning a year for you". What a prick.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 10:55 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:
(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: ROFLOL
Maybe Because I understand that a 'year' for a Jew is not based on the Gregorian calendar (meaning a year for you)

Wow. I'm not quite done catching up with the thread, but I had to stop when I saw this.

Did this little asshole seriously just imply that LFC doesn't know what the Gregorian calendar is?

"Meaning a year for you". What a prick.


Lol, I actually didn't, but I DO sincerely appreciate the vote of confidence from the likes of someone as intelligent as yourself. [emoji4]. I'm not ashamed to admit ignorance anywhere. Now I've learned something I didn't know before! Too bad we can't say the same about some of our theists here...[emoji848]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 10:41 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: ROFLOL
Maybe Because I understand that a 'year' for a Jew is not based on the Gregorian calendar (meaning a year for you)


Okay...so help me out here.  Are you talking about moon cycles?  Because according to the bible, Abraham lived to be around 150, Yes?  Correct me if I'm wrong.  So, going by that math, that would mean he was really only like...11 when he died?

The moon cycles wasn't a agreed on 'thing' till well after (hundreds of years) Abraham died. Abraham's life was based on a celestial calendar that can have a large margin of error. In short their is not enough known to accurately date or translate an accurate date for Him. Taking those errors into consideration many believe the number to be between 150 and 175 years.
Reply
RE: pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 10:43 am)Hmmm? Wrote:
(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: ROFLOL
Maybe Because I understand that a 'year' for a Jew is not based on the Gregorian calendar (meaning a year for you)


how many days in a year for a jew?

Depended on the Jew, The Year, and the Calender.
Reply
RE: pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 10:55 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:
(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: ROFLOL
Maybe Because I understand that a 'year' for a Jew is not based on the Gregorian calendar (meaning a year for you)

Wow. I'm not quite done catching up with the thread, but I had to stop when I saw this.

Did this little asshole seriously just imply that LFC doesn't know what the Gregorian calendar is?

"Meaning a year for you". What a prick.

Look sport I take nothing for granted. You people surprise me at what you do know and floor me at what you don't.

If I mean to be insulting I will call someone stupid.

Otherwise To me it's common sense to see a number like 900 years and automatically assume that we are not using the same measure of a year, so I then look it up. But for someone like LFC it seems that she thinks the world works now as it always had. that a year now is the same as what a year would be 5000 years ago. Now if a person thinks this then it would mean they have no knowledge of any other calendar. Otherwise if they were aware of another year calendar that did not total 365 1/4 days then why not assume that this particular is not being used?

To me it is just information, what you should or shouldn't know I TRY not to judge, UNLESS one of you makes a spectacle of themselves in their own ignorance, then tries to levy that ignorance into some sort of 'high ground' (I'm better than you argument)

Then I make a great effort to 'educate uses guys.'
Reply
RE: pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 10:59 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(April 4, 2016 at 10:55 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Wow. I'm not quite done catching up with the thread, but I had to stop when I saw this.

Did this little asshole seriously just imply that LFC doesn't know what the Gregorian calendar is?

"Meaning a year for you". What a prick.


Lol, I actually didn't, but I DO sincerely appreciate the vote of confidence from the likes of someone as intelligent as yourself. [emoji4]. I'm not ashamed to admit ignorance anywhere.  Now I've learned something I didn't know before!  Too bad we can't say the same about some of our theists here...[emoji848]
Respect for most of that.

Just remember it is the 'theist' who is taking you to school right now.

You guys get so wrapped up in your stereotypes and air of superiority you fail to see that most of the time, you are the one who has the faulty understanding of history, theology, Apologetics, And even Science and Logic.

You all depend way tooo much on the atheist theist stereotype. It leads you to all sorts of bad conclusions.
Reply
RE: pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 11:26 am)Drich Wrote:
(April 4, 2016 at 10:59 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Lol, I actually didn't, but I DO sincerely appreciate the vote of confidence from the likes of someone as intelligent as yourself. [emoji4]. I'm not ashamed to admit ignorance anywhere.  Now I've learned something I didn't know before!  Too bad we can't say the same about some of our theists here...[emoji848]
Respect for most of that.

Just remember it is the 'theist' who is taking you to school right now.

You guys get so wrapped up in your stereotypes and air of superiority you fail to see that most of the time, you are the one who has the faulty understanding of history, theology, Apologetics, And even Science and Logic.

You all depend way tooo much on the atheist theist stereotype. It leads you to all sorts of bad conclusions.

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTTKh9d4gFBmBJGzEgA_j1...pkuqcgqQYQ]
Reply
RE: pop morality
Let me get this right. What is moral is whatever the god character says it is. As no one has ever really had any dealings with this "god" thing then we are left with the misogynistic rantings of the people who made up the stupid stories all those years ago. Is that it? No progression? no growth? just the silly ravings of uneducated men back when the wheel was the peek of technology.
colour me unimpressed.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: pop morality
(April 4, 2016 at 12:52 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Let me get this right. What is moral is whatever the god character says it is. As no one has ever really had any dealings with this "god" thing then we are left with the misogynistic rantings of the people who made up the stupid stories all those years ago. Is that it? No progression? no growth? just the silly ravings of uneducated men back when the wheel was the peek of technology.
colour me unimpressed.

Oh, glob..

One step forward then this guy comes along and we get to start all over again.

So no DBP Morality is not even being measured here in this religion.

Do you not understand that?

Biblical Christian is free from all 'moral law' So that we may Love God to the best of our ablity and to love our neighbor as ourselves.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bibe Study 2: Questionable Morality Rhondazvous 30 3781 May 27, 2019 at 12:23 pm
Last Post: Vicki Q
  Christian morality delusions tackattack 87 12820 November 27, 2018 at 8:09 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Question to Theists About the Source of Morality GrandizerII 33 8599 January 8, 2016 at 7:39 pm
Last Post: Godscreated
  C.S. Lewis and the Argument From Morality Jenny A 15 6707 August 3, 2015 at 4:03 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  The questionable morality of Christianity (and Islam, for that matter) rado84 35 8468 July 21, 2015 at 9:01 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Stereotyping and morality Dontsaygoodnight 34 9262 March 20, 2015 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  You CAN game Christian morality RobbyPants 82 20759 March 12, 2015 at 3:39 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Challenge regarding Christian morality robvalue 170 41362 February 16, 2015 at 10:17 am
Last Post: Tonus
  The Prisoner's Dilemma and Objective/Subjective Morality RobbyPants 9 4580 December 17, 2014 at 9:41 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Atheist Morality vs Biblical Morality dyresand 46 15054 November 8, 2014 at 5:20 pm
Last Post: genkaus



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)