(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote:
Maybe Because I understand that a 'year' for a Jew is not based on the Gregorian calendar (meaning a year for you)
how many days in a year for a jew?
[Video: https://youtu.be/jUSnIX_n8IA]
pop morality
|
(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: how many days in a year for a jew?
[Video: https://youtu.be/jUSnIX_n8IA]
(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote:(April 4, 2016 at 9:39 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Why should anyone take seriously the views of someone who thinks a human being lived to be 900 years old, lol. This thread reeks of desperation. Wow. I'm not quite done catching up with the thread, but I had to stop when I saw this. Did this little asshole seriously just imply that LFC doesn't know what the Gregorian calendar is? "Meaning a year for you". What a prick.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love. (April 4, 2016 at 10:55 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: Lol, I actually didn't, but I DO sincerely appreciate the vote of confidence from the likes of someone as intelligent as yourself. [emoji4]. I'm not ashamed to admit ignorance anywhere. Now I've learned something I didn't know before! Too bad we can't say the same about some of our theists here...[emoji848]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. (April 4, 2016 at 10:41 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: The moon cycles wasn't a agreed on 'thing' till well after (hundreds of years) Abraham died. Abraham's life was based on a celestial calendar that can have a large margin of error. In short their is not enough known to accurately date or translate an accurate date for Him. Taking those errors into consideration many believe the number to be between 150 and 175 years. (April 4, 2016 at 10:55 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:(April 4, 2016 at 10:25 am)Drich Wrote: Look sport I take nothing for granted. You people surprise me at what you do know and floor me at what you don't. If I mean to be insulting I will call someone stupid. Otherwise To me it's common sense to see a number like 900 years and automatically assume that we are not using the same measure of a year, so I then look it up. But for someone like LFC it seems that she thinks the world works now as it always had. that a year now is the same as what a year would be 5000 years ago. Now if a person thinks this then it would mean they have no knowledge of any other calendar. Otherwise if they were aware of another year calendar that did not total 365 1/4 days then why not assume that this particular is not being used? To me it is just information, what you should or shouldn't know I TRY not to judge, UNLESS one of you makes a spectacle of themselves in their own ignorance, then tries to levy that ignorance into some sort of 'high ground' (I'm better than you argument) Then I make a great effort to 'educate uses guys.' (April 4, 2016 at 10:59 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:Respect for most of that.(April 4, 2016 at 10:55 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Wow. I'm not quite done catching up with the thread, but I had to stop when I saw this. Just remember it is the 'theist' who is taking you to school right now. You guys get so wrapped up in your stereotypes and air of superiority you fail to see that most of the time, you are the one who has the faulty understanding of history, theology, Apologetics, And even Science and Logic. You all depend way tooo much on the atheist theist stereotype. It leads you to all sorts of bad conclusions. (April 4, 2016 at 11:26 am)Drich Wrote:(April 4, 2016 at 10:59 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Lol, I actually didn't, but I DO sincerely appreciate the vote of confidence from the likes of someone as intelligent as yourself. [emoji4]. I'm not ashamed to admit ignorance anywhere. Now I've learned something I didn't know before! Too bad we can't say the same about some of our theists here...[emoji848]Respect for most of that.
Let me get this right. What is moral is whatever the god character says it is. As no one has ever really had any dealings with this "god" thing then we are left with the misogynistic rantings of the people who made up the stupid stories all those years ago. Is that it? No progression? no growth? just the silly ravings of uneducated men back when the wheel was the peek of technology.
colour me unimpressed. You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis. (April 4, 2016 at 12:52 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Let me get this right. What is moral is whatever the god character says it is. As no one has ever really had any dealings with this "god" thing then we are left with the misogynistic rantings of the people who made up the stupid stories all those years ago. Is that it? No progression? no growth? just the silly ravings of uneducated men back when the wheel was the peek of technology. Oh, glob.. One step forward then this guy comes along and we get to start all over again. So no DBP Morality is not even being measured here in this religion. Do you not understand that? Biblical Christian is free from all 'moral law' So that we may Love God to the best of our ablity and to love our neighbor as ourselves. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|