Quote: You know that does nothing to help the situation, yet you still do it.

What 'situation' is that?  Some fucking jesus freak making an ass out of himself?  Do you think it is the first shit and runner we've had?

Your sympathies are misplaced.  Another asshole just like him will be along in no time.

And he'll get the same shit thrown at him.

(July 31, 2016 at 8:10 pm)Theismisgreat Wrote: [Video removed: 30/30 restriction]

Funny how atheists, when in proper confrontations resort to name-calling and swearing. It's as if they have a limited intellect and their only hope to defend themselves here is to resort to child-grade tactics. Very sad to watch.

Administrator Notice
You must be a member here for 30 days and accrue 30 posts before you are allowed to post video content. Please read our Rules.

He was here to fight the godless heathens and AND AAAANNNDDDD, oh he came.

(July 31, 2016 at 9:35 pm)Alex K Wrote: It's not like there aren't *any* advantages to impact crushers though. As always, one has to take into account the big picture - which rock sizes are needed, portability, output. It's not as clear-cut as the OP makes it sound.

I'm strongly against the very concept of rock crushing. It's an expression of an imperialistic patriarchy. Rocks should be allowed to exist in whatever form they desire.

Personally, I wish I was a big chunk of Plagioclase Feldspar.

I think the description "insane" is enough to account for insane behaviour. No need to dig further.

I'm obviously missing something here.

(August 1, 2016 at 4:56 am)robvalue Wrote: I think the description "insane" is enough to account for insane behaviour. No need to dig further.

I'm not insane. I have a certificate to prove it.

(August 1, 2016 at 5:04 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(August 1, 2016 at 4:56 am)robvalue Wrote: I think the description "insane" is enough to account for insane behaviour. No need to dig further.

I'm not insane. I have a certificate to prove it.

Mathilda! 

(August 1, 2016 at 4:52 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(July 31, 2016 at 9:35 pm)Alex K Wrote: It's not like there aren't *any* advantages to impact crushers though. As always, one has to take into account the big picture - which rock sizes are needed, portability, output. It's not as clear-cut as the OP makes it sound.

I'm strongly against the very concept of rock crushing. It's an expression of an imperialistic patriarchy. Rocks should be allowed to exist in whatever form they desire.

Personally, I wish I was a big chunk of Plagioclase Feldspar.

Wow, your rock privilege is so showing!

This is bullshit. I want to see the insane raving atheists! Where are they?

RAVE RAVE RAVE RAVE RAVE